• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

U.S. Ally Looks to Buy Chinese J-35 Stealth Jets

You mean like claims in the past that future wars would be won with bombers? Then with intercontinental missiles?

I have been hearing and reading claims like that since the end of WWII. Yet even to this day, no war was won without boots on the ground. Anywhere, ever.
"boots on the ground" is not what it means according to you. Infantry has always had air support, artillery and plane rockets and bombs all which will be obsolete in the near future. Robots are in the infant state of development. Grunts did no damage to those Russian bombers Ukraine destroyed.
 
Yup. I see a future war where adversaries launch hundreds of thousands of drones at each other.
Drones are being manufactured by the millions everywhere around the big blue marble.
 
You mean like claims in the past that future wars would be won with bombers? Then with intercontinental missiles?

I have been hearing and reading claims like that since the end of WWII. Yet even to this day, no war was won without boots on the ground. Anywhere, ever.


The boots in the future might belong to robots, not humans
 



Foreign governments no longer fully trust the Trump administration due to factors such as Trump having expansionist designs on Greeenland and Panama, the on-again off-again Trump tariffs, and Trump not fully backing Ukraine against Russian aggressibn.

The headline is misleading. The US does not have allies anymore.
 
"boots on the ground" is not what it means according to you. Infantry has always had air support, artillery and plane rockets and bombs all which will be obsolete in the near future. Robots are in the infant state of development. Grunts did no damage to those Russian bombers Ukraine destroyed.

And exactly how much of Ukraine is being occupied at this time by Drones? How much of Russia did Ukraine occupy with drones?

No, the problem is that I know what I am talking about, and you are spinning at the moment. Drones occupy nothing, and you can not occupy anything without boots on the ground.

This spins right back to the claims in the 1950s by General LeMay that infantry was obsolete and future wars would be won by bombers. Well, it's now seven decades later. And Infantry is still needed as much as ever.

This is just a newer spin on the same claim.
 
The boots in the future might belong to robots, not humans

I talk facts, not science fiction.

cylon.gif
 
Foreign governments no longer fully trust the Trump administration due to factors such as Trump having expansionist designs on Greeenland and Panama, the on-again off-again Trump tariffs, and Trump not fully backing Ukraine against Russian aggressibn.
That BS claim of yours is not supported in the article you quoted.
 
I talk facts, not science fiction.

cylon.gif


150 years ago airplanes would be science fiction

100 years ago flying to the moon would be science fiction 50 years ago using drones to destroy bombers 5000 miles away using sim cards would have been science fiction.

Humanoid robots exist, not much is stopping people from adding m4 rifles to them and having them patrol an area for a few hours ( battery upgrades and better autonomous software likely required
 
A drunken monkey know future wars won't be won with tanks, planes, artillery. etc. AI, drones both large and small and satellites will win.
Maybe someone could explain that to the Ukrainian and Russian soldiers, etc, that happen to be where a JDAM or FBA1500 gliding bomb lands?
 
The headline is misleading. The US does not have allies anymore.

Well, I didn't pen the headline, but I understand that Trump has embraced isolationism (while allowing Putin to slide).
 
And exactly how much of Ukraine is being occupied at this time by Drones? How much of Russia did Ukraine occupy with drones?

No, the problem is that I know what I am talking about, and you are spinning at the moment. Drones occupy nothing, and you can not occupy anything without boots on the ground.

This spins right back to the claims in the 1950s by General LeMay that infantry was obsolete and future wars would be won by bombers. Well, it's now seven decades later. And Infantry is still needed as much as ever.

This is just a newer spin on the same claim.
Try occupying land that is smothered with bombs from drones. Russia last night landed 500 on Ukraine last night. Show me the list of boots on the ground in Hiroshima and Nagasaki
 
Try occupying land that is smothered with bombs from drones. Russia last night landed 500 on Ukraine last night. Show me the list of boots on the ground in Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Russia is occupying quite a bit of land in Ukraine with boots on the ground. Know what they do not occupy? Places they do not have boots on the ground.

Oh, and the attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki could not have happened without the Battle of TInian. A one week battle involving over 40,000 Marines taking the island away from 10,000 Japanese defenders. At the cost of almost 300 Americans, and 6,000 Japanese lives.

Interesting you bring up two cases where bombs were dropped, and completely ignore the land battle that was required in order to provide the runway that those bombers took off from.
 
A drunken monkey know future wars won't be won with tanks, planes, artillery. etc. AI, drones both large and small and satellites will win.

Strange how Russia is attempting to win its war with The Ukraine with tanks, planes artillery etc....
 
Strange how Russia is attempting to win its war with The Ukraine with tanks, planes artillery etc....
Duh, you seemed confused on the concept of the future and the present. I'll omit the past it may blow your mind.
 
Back
Top Bottom