• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Two Words that Explain the 10th Republican Debate

M

MrT

Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 4, 2015
Messages
5,849
Reaction score
2,426
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
...And their respective Campaigns as a Whole

And those words are "Unintelligible Yelling."

1456502655-yelling27n-1-web.webp

Last night's Republican brawl at recess was best summed up by some anonymous soul working at the closed-captioning desk at CNN who clearly was completely fed up with the idiotic proceedings on stage and decided to let the hearing-impaired citizens of the United States of America know that he was. (In fact, I hope that the hearing-impaired citizens of the United States of America know how lucky they were last night.) This wasn't a political debate. This was a pissing contest among men who are worried about the size of their dicks.
Click to expand...

Two Words That Explain the Republican Debate (and the Campaign, as a Whole)

That sounds about right.
 
It sure was *not* a debate, very little real value and a bunch of back and forth nonsense.
 
I thought the two words where "petulant whining". Last night's debate was like a campaign add for democrats. "Vote for us, we are not that bad."
 
I was certain Rubio was going to pop Trump. That would have made for some good TV.

I'm not sure what the point of the debates are at this point. We know where they all stand.
 
Gaius46 said:
I was certain Rubio was going to pop Trump. That would have made for some good TV.
Click to expand...

Usually, candidates don't perform fellatio for cabinet positions in front of national television. They wait until after the cameras turn off.
 
Seemed like there were some professional cacklers in the audience.

Every time Rubio hit Trump with a line, you could hear some high-pitched laughing that really stood out prominently - hard for me to believe that was coming from a natural audience reaction. It felt like the audience had been seeded with a professional peanut gallery. Establishment games - they only help to further show Trump as an underdog, and as a genuine political outsider taking on a closed establishment.
 
sanman said:
Seemed like there were some professional cacklers in the audience.

Every time Rubio hit Trump with a line, you could hear some high-pitched laughing that really stood out prominently - hard for me to believe that was coming from a natural audience reaction. It felt like the audience had been seeded with a professional peanut gallery. Establishment games - they only help to further show Trump as an underdog, and as a genuine political outsider taking on a closed establishment.
Click to expand...

Oh come on. Not everyone in the audience is going to be neutral or a Trump supporter - there are other candidates in the race and there are individuals who have solidified behind the other candidates.

You need to stop accepting everything Trump says at face value. Just because he tries to claim that there are paid pundits in the audience every time he gets boo'd or his opponents gets cheered does not mean that they actually exist.
 
Redress said:
I thought the two words where "petulant whining". Last night's debate was like a campaign add for democrats. "Vote for us, we are not that bad."
Click to expand...

You mean they lied too?
 
joG said:
You mean they lied too?
Click to expand...

Can you point to a democratic debate where the candidates where spending their time crying that they where picked on and not given enough time to talk?
 
MrT said:
Oh come on. Not everyone in the audience is going to be neutral or a Trump supporter - there are other candidates in the race and there are individuals who have solidified behind the other candidates.

You need to stop accepting everything Trump says at face value. Just because he tries to claim that there are paid pundits in the audience every time he gets boo'd or his opponents gets cheered does not mean that they actually exist.
Click to expand...


Says the person who isn't going to vote for ANY candidate coming out of the republican party.
 
Redress said:
Can you point to a democratic debate where the candidates where spending their time crying that they where picked on and not given enough time to talk?
Click to expand...

Jim Webb. But that little ***** dropped out after the first debate.
 
Redress said:
Can you point to a democratic debate where the candidates where spending their time crying that they where picked on and not given enough time to talk?
Click to expand...

It's been a long time since anyone cared what happened in a democrat debate. :mrgreen:

Eight years ago maybe when Hillary was still competitive with Obama.
 
Redress said:
Can you point to a democratic debate where the candidates where spending their time crying that they where picked on and not given enough time to talk?
Click to expand...

I'm sure that if there were 8 Democrats debating some of them would be whining too.
 
clownboy said:
Says the person who isn't going to vote for ANY candidate coming out of the republican party.
Click to expand...

Oh ****! I'm a paid pundit! You caught me!
 
Redress said:
Can you point to a democratic debate where the candidates where spending their time crying that they where picked on and not given enough time to talk?
Click to expand...

The Democrats only have 2 candidates so there is plenty of time to talk, although Jim Webb whined about his lack of time
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom