Two of the most damning things from Arizona audit report

[Slartibartfast]

Not really, though...as the audit are performed and the results are examined...the people facing consequences for their election fraud actions will certainly grow.

I predict in 20 years you will still be claiming this while it never occurs to you there was never a problem in the first place.

 

[Mycroft]

Just curious as I only got to listen to part of the live stream.

During this hearing, did the AZ Senate invite any State level election officials or election officials from Maricopa County to provide expert testimony that might be in contradiction to the Cyber Ninjas pronouncements?

WW

During the hearing? No. Before the hearing? I don't know. After the hearing? I don't know. I didn't keep watching after the last person gave his report. On the other hand, this wasn't intended to be a "he said/she said" event. It was the people that the AZ Senate commissioned to perform the audit giving their reports.

However, it's likely the AZ AG will be "inviting" the MCBOS...and maybe the AZ SoS...to provide some "expert" testimony.

 

[protectionist75]

This audit was never necessary

Read my fraud list. Post 168 - 178 >>>

How I Went From Far-Left Socialist to Conservative Republican

When I first started voting in 1967, my main thought was to stay out of the Vietnam War, which I hated (and still do). It was a Democrat then who was waging that war (Lyndon Johnson), and a Republican (Richard Nixon) who said he had a secret plan to end the war. Lots of leftists, including me...

debatepolitics.com

 

[protectionist75]

LOL.... Illegal in what way?

• 
  Canvass showed over 3,400 more ballots were cast than recorded
• Over 9,000 more mail-in ballots were received and recorded than the official number of mail-in ballots sent out by the county
• Precincts show more ballots cast on election day than people who showed up to vote. 1,551 extra votes.
• Approximately 2,500 ballots were shown in the early vote returns that do not have a voter listed as casting them.
• Over 255,000 early votes shown in the county final vote file do not have a corresponding entry in the early voting returns file
• Over 23,000 voted by mail after moving after the October 5th cutoff
• 2,382 voters cast votes in Maricopa county, in person, after moving out of the county
• Over 2,000 voters who moved out of Arizona during the 29 days before the election were given a full ballot instead of a presidential-only ballot.
• Close to 300 deceased voters potentially vote.
• There is an unprecedented number of discrepancies in the vote total. This could only happen through malicious actions or severe incompetence from Maricopa county officials.

 

[protectionist75]

Data provided by Cyber Ninjas, an unqualified, source, is not reliable. If they or anyone want to sue, their data methods will be depositioned, subjected to discovery, and scrutinized by the DOJ.

You can bet your rooty patooty they don't want that to happen.

IN short, it is an exercise in partisan stupidity and incompetence.

Any part of the Biden administration (including DOJ) is an unqualified, unreliable source.

 

[protectionist75]

Why do you and @Grim17 hate your country so much?

Nothing needs to be "cleaned up".

You guys as usual are lying through your teeth about the election for one reason and one reason only.

The dictator you want didn't win.

This is purely about the result and not the process and continuing to undermine your own country due to your hatred for it is not healthy.

Everything you just said is what Biden and his thugs are doing. Pure dictator, total fraud stolen election, Democrat America-haters.

 

[protectionist75]

Here is the problem I have with the audit report. The company hired to do the audit has no experience whatsoever. The company owner is a known Trump supporter and Q supporter. The senator that started this whole thing is stuck up Trump's you know what. 90% of the funds to pay for the report came from unknown dark interests, IE, Trump donors.

In what world should anyone be confident in the outcome of the audit? Why did it take them so long to tell us that Biden actually gained a few votes? We all new Biden won last November. How is it that it takes 5 months to audit one county in Arizona, when the entire state was audited by professionals in just weeks?

I'll tell you how. The whole thing was designed to create chaos in our voting systems. And when they figured out how much money they could suck out of gullible Trump supporters, it became a months long grift.

So in my mind, the report has no credibility. It's laughable.

What the audit found was an election OVERFLOWING WITH FRAUD >>

The results of Arizona’s historic audit show numerous discrepancies that were found in the audit. Here are just some of the findings:

• Canvass showed over 3,400 more ballots were cast than recorded
• Over 9,000 more mail-in ballots were received and recorded than the official number of mail-in ballots sent out by the county
• Precincts show more ballots cast on election day than people who showed up to vote. 1,551 extra votes.
• Approximately 2,500 ballots were shown in the early vote returns that do not have a voter listed as casting them.
• Over 255,000 early votes shown in the county final vote file do not have a corresponding entry in the early voting returns file
• Over 23,000 voted by mail after moving after the October 5th cutoff
• 2,382 voters cast votes in Maricopa county, in person, after moving out of the county
• Over 2,000 voters who moved out of Arizona during the 29 days before the election were given a full ballot instead of a presidential-only ballot.
• Close to 300 deceased voters potentially vote.
• There is an unprecedented number of discrepancies in the vote total. This could only happen through malicious actions or severe incompetence from Maricopa county officials.

Even without listing all of the issues that were uncovered, there were still too many discrepancies to declare an outright winner of Arizona’s electoral votes.
Arizona MUST decertify.

 

[Crakhobarbie]

No, that # is far too large to be chance, and election day as the threshold is far too coincidental. Something changed, I'd just like to know what.

Do you don't know the if, how or why of it. You just " think" it's odd. Well you go ahead and ride that dog into town. IMHO it's pointless.

 

[Crakhobarbie]

Everything you just said is what Biden and his thugs are doing. Pure dictator, total fraud stolen election, Democrat America-haters.

And tomorrow night on Tucker Carlson..... The exact same garbage!! What a surprise!!

 

[Crakhobarbie]

What the audit found was an election OVERFLOWING WITH FRAUD >>

The results of Arizona’s historic audit show numerous discrepancies that were found in the audit. Here are just some of the findings:

• Canvass showed over 3,400 more ballots were cast than recorded
• Over 9,000 more mail-in ballots were received and recorded than the official number of mail-in ballots sent out by the county
• Precincts show more ballots cast on election day than people who showed up to vote. 1,551 extra votes.
• Approximately 2,500 ballots were shown in the early vote returns that do not have a voter listed as casting them.
• Over 255,000 early votes shown in the county final vote file do not have a corresponding entry in the early voting returns file
• Over 23,000 voted by mail after moving after the October 5th cutoff
• 2,382 voters cast votes in Maricopa county, in person, after moving out of the county
• Over 2,000 voters who moved out of Arizona during the 29 days before the election were given a full ballot instead of a presidential-only ballot.
• Close to 300 deceased voters potentially vote.
• There is an unprecedented number of discrepancies in the vote total. This could only happen through malicious actions or severe incompetence from Maricopa county officials.

Even without listing all of the issues that were uncovered, there were still too many discrepancies to declare an outright winner of Arizona’s electoral votes.
Arizona MUST decertify.

Cut and paste.... Whine and complain.... Rinse and repeat. This is getting monotonous.

 

[Hampton86]

Please post the quote from the report where that was stated.

.

The part where it found no issues. And this from some biased unqualified wackos

Finally willing to accept you trumpers lost?

 

[Jetboogieman]

This is about preventing this kinda of ridiculous crap going forward, to increase the election security and integrity.

No it isn’t.

This is strictly about the fact that the dictator you want didn’t win because I know for a fact that even if you “strengthen” election security.

If you lose anyway and Trump or someone like him still cries foul, you’ll still follow him down that rabbit hole.

Stop lying about the election.

 

[TurtleDude]

Are they lizard people too?

I thought Ross Perot died.

 

[eohrnberger]

No it isn’t.

This is strictly about the fact that the dictator you want didn’t win because I know for a fact that even if you “strengthen” election security.

Cool story bro. Didn't know you were so into fiction.
(PS: Don't even try to tell me what my motivations are. Realistically you have no idea, nor to you know me)

If you lose anyway and Trump or someone like him still cries foul, you’ll still follow him down that rabbit hole.

Nope. Never have.

Stop lying about the election.

Stop calling me a liar for a position that I have not taken.

 

[Grand Mal]

Everything you just said is what Biden and his thugs are doing. Pure dictator, total fraud stolen election, Democrat America-haters.

Yeah, this isn't over-the-top hyper-partisan bullshit. No way. This is thoughtful, carefully-considered analysis.

Welcome to the nothing-worth-listening-to list.

 

[Grim17]

I asked you for one. Give one example.. It should be easy for you to do since you stated there are plenty of examples.

Quit this tactic of kicking things back and riding the fence.

You want an example of some screwy shit uncovered by the audit... Well here you go:



Here are several examples of envelopes that were signature verified and given a stamp of approval... Notice anything about those stamps?



Instead of being in front (on top) of the white arrows on the envelopes where logic dictates they would have to be, somehow those stamps magically appeared underneath the arrow on the envelope that tells voters where to sign.

Does that meet the definition of "nefarious" in your opinion, or are you going to try to explain it away?

.

 

[Grim17]

Did that happen?

No... Someone on this thread said that if a person moved that their ballot would be forwarded, and I explained that it was against Arizona law for the postal service to forward an election ballot.

.

 

[Juks]

What this means is that in the days after the election, they needed to be able to count votes that they would normally be unable to count...votes that they wanted to use to stuff the ballot box for Biden.

If those votes that were counted AFTER the election are ever canvassed...something the AZ AG has the power to do...I think they'll find that those ballots that actually have signatures will not be able to be matched up with real voters. Also, the ballots that had no signatures...but were accepted and counted...should be removed from the count.

If all that is done, then heads should roll and the election results should be decertified...something the legislature can do.

The question, at this point, is whether the AZ AG and the legislature have the political balls to do all that.

We'll have to wait and see.

In the meantime, there is a lot more stuff for the AG and the legislature to do to hold people responsible for violating AZ election laws and to create legislation that'll prevent this from happening again.

Wasn't the conclution of the audit that it was the other way around? That Bidens win was bigger than the figures after the election suggested?

 

[Grim17]

Let me guess. ALL the illegible signatures were votes for Biden.

Am I right?

They didn't examine the ballots, just the envelopes the ballots were sent in with, so there's no way for them to know who they voted for.

.

 

[Grim17]

If you cared about election integrity, you wouldn’t be looking for any excuse, no matter how ridiculous, to claim that Trump won.

There's one problem with that... I have never claimed Trump won and that has nothing to do with why I support audits like this. I want any issues discovered and all necessary actions taken to fix our election system.

.

 

[Juks]

They didn't examine the ballots, just the envelopes the ballots were sent in with, so there's no way for them to know who they voted for.

.

Again: Wasn't the conclution of the audit that it was the other way around? That Bidens win was bigger than the figures after the election suggested?

 

[Hamish Howl]

Imagine after 7-8 months of humiliation, the MAGA freaks are lining up to wallow around in it.

 

[Grim17]

Data provided by Cyber Ninjas, an unqualified, source, is not reliable. If they or anyone want to sue, their data methods will be depositioned, subjected to discovery, and scrutinized by the DOJ.

You can bet your rooty patooty they don't want that to happen.

IN short, it is an exercise in partisan stupidity and incompetence.

Dismissing the findings is exactly what I expected from the left. I damn sure didn't expect them to do the right thing and support fixing the problems.

.

 

[ClaraD]

There were 2 things that really stood out to me in today's audit report that are tough to write off as merely being "coincidental", and seem to indicate that there was some internal hanky-panky going on with the mail-in ballots in last November's election.

First there was this:

View attachment 67355417

Compared to the 2016 election, there was a 53% increase in the number of mail-in ballots in last November's election. Logic dictates you would see a similar increase, or at least some increase, in the number of signature mismatch rejections, but that isn't what happened. Instead the number of signature mismatch rejections went from 1,456 in 2016, to only 587 in 2020.... That's a whopping 61% decrease.


The other thing that caught my attention was this:

View attachment 67355416

In the 4 weeks leading up to election day, only 5% of the signatures from mail-in ballot were seen as illegible when examined, which sounds perfectly reasonable... What sends up the red flag for me is the fact that of the ballot signatures looked at from the 4 days after the election, an unbelievable 95% of them were deemed illegible. It went from 1 out of 20 being illegible before election day, to 19 out of 20 after election day.

I'm sorry, but I just can't square that, and I can't see anyone else being able to square it either.

.

all your numbers show is more people moved to Maricopa county and registered to vote in 2020 than in 2016...there literally is nothing nefarious about this.

 

[Grim17]

The part where it found no issues. And this from some biased unqualified wackos

Finally willing to accept you trumpers lost?

You mean like this list of "no issues" from the report"