• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Twitter set to accept Musk's $43 billion offer

So why did conservatives avoid Truth Social like the plague? The option was and is there. Everything that conservatives said they wanted from Twitter existed in Truth Social. What was the problem?
No idea, since I personally have never signed up for either. But if many of them are like me, it would be because echo chambers are boring. Besides, there were already "conservative" alternatives to Twitter that weren't doing particularly well, what was one more, other than that it had Trump's name attached to it?
 
No idea, since I personally have never signed up for either. But if many of them are like me, it would be because echo chambers are boring.

And assuming that conservative dreams of turning Twitter into a “successful” version of Truth Social merely results in that platform becoming another echo chamber? What then?

Your points hits closer to the truth of why right wing alternatives to Twitter fail as any conservative has openly gotten.

Besides, there were already "conservative" alternatives to Twitter that weren't doing particularly well, what was one more, other than that it had Trump's name attached to it?
 
We need another Trust Buster like Teddy Roosevelt back in the day.

Only cartoon capitalists agree with the Twitter model (the fans). In my opinion, cartoon capitalists are normally people that never delivered a service or started a business but support this variant of monopoly.
 
Last edited:
No idea, since I personally have never signed up for either. But if many of them are like me, it would be because echo chambers are boring. Besides, there were already "conservative" alternatives to Twitter that weren't doing particularly well, what was one more, other than that it had Trump's name attached to it?

I don’t know anything about your media habits, but if you’re a conservative and you don’t like echo chambers, you’re a very rare exception.

Right wing media is constantly telling its audience that it is the only truth. Fox used the false “Fair and balanced” motto for years, even though they had (and still have) virtually no credibility.

But that wasn’t unusual. Every right wing AM radio disc jockey did the same thing. All the fringe sites that repeat and crib off of one another do it.

Trump promoted the echo chamber thinking.

And the mob obeyed, fleeing FB, Twitter etc, for a host of dodgy sources full of made up nonsense all dropped in an echo chamber to be consumed by in incurious and ill informed audience.

if you don’t like echo chambers, you are the exception, not the rule at all.
 
And assuming that conservative dreams of turning Twitter into a “successful” version of Truth Social merely results in that platform becoming another echo chamber? What then?
Unlikely. Assuming that Musk holds to his promise to require to operate by rules like, say, this site, and many of the Left don't like it, they are going to run into the same problem the Conservatives ran into--where are they going to go?

I don’t know anything about your media habits, but if you’re a conservative and you don’t like echo chambers, you’re a very rare exception.
Why limit it to Conservatives? Pretty much all my life it's mostly been the Left that's been working to shut down speech they don't approve of, and the Left's meltdown at the thought that Twitter might become the free speech haven it masqueraded as has just been the latest example of how they consider free speech (of those people and ideas they don't approve of) to be a disaster.
 
Unlikely. Assuming that Musk holds to his promise to require to operate by rules like, say, this site, and many of the Left don't like it, they are going to run into the same problem the Conservatives ran into--where are they going to go?

Ah, so the fantasy is that if Twitter turns into an abusive hell hole, liberals will have to stay there and “take it.”

And conservatives had plenty of alternatives. They just didn’t like being where there weren’t liberals.


Why limit it to Conservatives? Pretty much all my life it's mostly been the Left that's been working to shut down speech they don't approve of, and the Left's meltdown at the thought that Twitter might become the free speech haven it masqueraded as has just been the latest example of how they consider free speech (of those people and ideas they don't approve of) to be a disaster.
 
Last edited:
Ah, so the fantasy is that if Twitter turns into an abusive hell hole, liberals will have to stay there and “take it.”
Twitter is no more likely to become an "abusive hell hole" than this site is.
 
Twitter is no more likely to become an "abusive hell hole" than this site is.
ONe thing.. twitter is an international company , and many places, there are standards set for social media. If moderation to a certain degree does not get set, it will be driving out of the EU for example.
 
Twitter is no more likely to become an "abusive hell hole" than this site is.
But the fantasy is that it will be, clearly. Your statement that liberals will have nowhere else to go gives the game away.
 
Apparently the Dems think this issue is worthy of a possible hearing (and waste of taxpayer time and money)

Stolen Valor Asshole Richard Blumenthal felt the need to opine too.
 
Was the Hunter Biden laptop story fake news?

Absolutely. One that your political masters will dangle in front of your faces all the way through 2024, and perhaps further if Biden wins re-election.
 
Absolutely. One that your political masters will dangle in front of your faces all the way through 2024, and perhaps further if Biden wins re-election.
I have to wonder sometimes if some of you guys actually believe what you post or if you just kind of blurt things out reflexively without really thing it through first.

You know good and well that the substantive material on that laptop(emails, text messages, etc...) has been verified. Trying to deny it or spin it at this point is just plain silliness.
 
I have to wonder sometimes if some of you guys actually believe what you post or if you just kind of blurt things out reflexively without really thing it through first.

You know good and well that the substantive material on that laptop(emails, text messages, etc...) has been verified. Trying to deny it or spin it at this point is just plain silliness.

We've seen this "story" play out over and over for decades...and the results are exactly the same.

Hunter's laptop is the new flavor of the week. When that amounts to nothing (and it will), you'll be told to be outraged about another "flavor of the week". What matters in the end is...you'll vote Republican as you are told.
 
We've seen this "story" play out over and over for decades...and the results are exactly the same.

Hunter's laptop is the new flavor of the week. When that amounts to nothing (and it will), you'll be told to be outraged about another "flavor of the week". What matters in the end is...you'll vote Republican as you are told.
Another reply which reeks of reflexive action with zero thought. You really do have nothing, don't you.
 
Another reply which reeks of reflexive action with zero thought. You really do have nothing, don't you.

No comrade, it's you who has nothing...and you never do.
 
Why do you lie so much?

Politically, Musk has described himself as "half Democrat, half Republican" and "I'm somewhere in the middle, socially liberal and fiscally conservative."[3] In 2018, he stated that he was "not a conservative. I'm registered independent [and] politically moderate."[4] Prompted by the emergence of artificial intelligence, Musk has voiced support for a universal basic income;[5] he additionally backs direct democracy and has stated he thinks the government on Mars will be a direct democracy.[6][7] He has described himself as a "socialist", but "not the kind that shifts resources from most productive to least productive, pretending to do good, while actually causing harm"—arguing instead, "true socialism seeks greatest good for all",[8] but later clarified not to take this tweet too seriously.[9][undue weight?discuss] He supports targeting an inclusive tax rate of 40%, prefers consumption taxes to income taxes, and supports the estate tax, as the "probability of progeny being equally excellent at capital allocation is not high."[10]

In an interview with The Washington Post, Musk stated he was a "significant (though not top-tier) donor to Democrats," but that he also gives heavily to Republicans. Musk further stated that political contributions are a requirement in order to have a voice in the United States government.[11][12] A 2012 report from the Sunlight Foundation, a nonpartisan group that tracks government spending, found that since 2002, SpaceX had spent more than $4 million on lobbying the United States Congress and more than $800,000 in political contributions to Democrats and Republicans. As for Musk specifically, the same report said that "SpaceX's campaign to win political support has been systematic and sophisticated," and that "unlike most tech-startups, SpaceX has maintained a significant lobbying presence in Washington almost since day 1." and that "Musk himself has donated roughly $725,000 to various campaigns since 2002. In 2004, he contributed $2,000 to President George W. Bush's reelection campaign, maxing out (over $100,000)[13] to Barack Obama's reelection campaign and donated $5,000 to Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, who represents Florida, a state critical to the space industry. [...] All told, Musk and SpaceX gave out roughly $250,000 in the 2012 election cycle."[11][14]
He supports targeting an inclusive tax rate of 40%,
prefers consumption taxes to income taxes,
and supports the estate tax, as the
"probability of progeny being equally excellent at capital allocation is not high."


1653004315320.png
 
Back
Top Bottom