“It’s certainly plausible that they didn’t want it for the viewpoint, or they just didn’t want it,” he said. “Both are plausible conclusions. I made one rather than the other.”
KUSI-TV is unaffiliated with any broadcast network and owned by McKinnon Broadcasting Co. Its general manager, Michael McKinnon, was described by the San Diego Business Journal as a “longtime supporter of conservative causes and candidates in the San Diego area.”
More alternative facts from conservatives who can't admit they were wrong.
TV station backs off accusation that CNN played politics
They cant prove it, os they walked it back. But that doesnt mean they were wrong.
Your claim does not comport with reality.More alternative facts from conservatives who can't admit they were wrong.
TV station backs off accusation that CNN played politics
Your claim does not comport with reality.
CNN said it had also reached out to reporters at other local stations about a possible segment but didn’t follow through when the plans changed. “This happens many times every single day,” the network said in a statement. “This is a non-story.”
Even if plans change several times a second. Why did their plans change? Because Acosta's report failed?
Do you know if that is the reason it happened or not?My claim is that the network accusing them of being biased against conservatives has walked back their claims and saying, "maybe it did happen, maybe it didn't happen," like a child.
If they believed in their cause they wouldn't have walked it back like cowards. But I don't expect you to understand what it means to stick by a cause that makes you feel good. You wouldn't even admit if you donated to build the wall.
Cause?? What cause is involved here? The fact is, they made an accusation they cannot back up, so they walked it back. CNN denied it and they cant prove it so it was the right thing to do. That doesnt mean that they got it wrong though.
That being CNN is biased against conservatives or at least biased against people reporting negative border stories at said border. That was his whole complaint and now he can't or won't back it up. In fact, he didn't even check with the network to see why they didn't pick him. Do keep up.
Keep up with what? You are running behind me. :roll: They made an accusation against CNN that they couldnt prove and CNN denied so they walked it back. That doesnt mean they arent right and it certainly isnt alternative facts that you claim it to be.
More alternative facts from conservatives who can't admit they were wrong.
TV station backs off accusation that CNN played politics
We all know that the station was right. They just backed off because they don't have proof.
I'm from the old school where people didn't abandon common sense to further their political agenda... but not everyone can have integrity.
They blatantly accused CNN without evidence. :lamo Great Defense, boy.
Cause?? What cause is involved here? The fact is, they made an accusation they cannot back up, so they walked it back. CNN denied it and they cant prove it so it was the right thing to do. That doesnt mean that they got it wrong though.
Common sense... Look it up sometime.
They did the right thing when CNN came back swinging their big **** in their face.
I'll remember this thread next time some rich old white guy goes down in the #metoo movement and you can't stand the "false" accusations against him.
And I'm sure you'll forget that CNN has an unmistakable anti-Trump bias...
More alternative facts from conservatives who can't admit they were wrong.
TV station backs off accusation that CNN played politics
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?