• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump's TV Judge Pirro is failing.

AZRWinger said:
Dude. You basically proved your ignorance of Washington, DC jury politicization. Remember, DC juries refused to convict Obama officials who manufactured the Russian collusion hoax for political reasons. Democrats and their media toadies gleefully denounced Trump appointed Special Counsel Durham as incompetent. Only recently when the long suppressed annex to the Durham report was made public did we see the truth.
Click to expand...
Annnnndddddddd...

You did it again.

Wow
 
AZRWinger said:
False assumption the DC grand jury would reach a conclusion based on the law. Instead, they preferred mob rule to the rule of law.
Click to expand...

They rejected calling something felony assault that didn’t qualify as such. The prosecution brought an exaggerated charge that didn’t fit the legal definition. It is on them for bringing weak evidence not based on the actual law trying to act tough. This will happen to any prosecutor who does this anywhere in the country.
 
devildavid said:
They rejected calling something felony assault that didn’t qualify as such. The prosecution brought an exaggerated charge that didn’t fit the legal definition. It is on them for bringing weak evidence not based on the actual law trying to act tough. This will happen to any prosecutor who does this anywhere in the country.
Click to expand...
Not true.

The J6 senior prosecutor his shock and awe policy charging peaceful tourists who walked through open doors into the Capitol. They were so "violent" the rope lines restrained them. Nonetheless the zealot prosecutor overcharged them with felonies the DC grand juries acted as a pep squad issuing indictments as instructed. After all, the law and even restraint is secondary to Orange Man Bad.
 
AZRWinger said:
Not true.

The J6 senior prosecutor his shock and awe policy charging peaceful tourists who walked through open doors into the Capitol. They were so "violent" the rope lines restrained them. Nonetheless the zealot prosecutor overcharged them with felonies the DC grand juries acted as a pep squad issuing indictments as instructed. After all, the law and even restraint is secondary to Orange Man Bad.
Click to expand...

Let those impotent tears of rage flow through you.
 
AZRWinger said:
Not true.

The J6 senior prosecutor his shock and awe policy charging peaceful tourists who walked through open doors into the Capitol. They were so "violent" the rope lines restrained them. Nonetheless the zealot prosecutor overcharged them with felonies the DC grand juries acted as a pep squad issuing indictments as instructed. After all, the law and even restraint is secondary to Orange Man Bad.
Click to expand...

It is true. That action did not amount to a felony offense, by the what written law states.

On Jan 6 people destroyed property and broke into doors and windows. There were no peaceful tourists entering the Capitol. Peaceful tourists are let in by guides who show them around on a schedule. The also attacked the DC police violently. There was much violent and destructive actions by the Jan 6 rioters. The indictments were valid.
 
jaypatriot said:
It's amazing the view you have of the way we are governed from 9,762 miles away. Or to make it easier for you: that's 15,710 kilometers.
I look at Australia and all I can see are koalas, kangaroos, and some of the biggest, hairiest insects in the entire world. And every once in a while a few aborigines trying to eke out an existence in a big country.
Be sure to wear high boots when you visit the Outback.
Click to expand...
What a stupid post.
Seriously stupid.
 
AZRWinger said:
Not true.

The J6 senior prosecutor his shock and awe policy charging peaceful tourists who walked through open doors into the Capitol. They were so "violent" the rope lines restrained them. Nonetheless the zealot prosecutor overcharged them with felonies the DC grand juries acted as a pep squad issuing indictments as instructed. After all, the law and even restraint is secondary to Orange Man Bad.
Click to expand...
Why do you say shit that is so hilariously and demonstrably untrue?
 
devildavid said:
It is true. That action did not amount to a felony offense, by the what written law states.
Click to expand...
Typical Democrat political rationalization of an individual violently assaulting a police officer. Before throwing whatever he happened to have in his hand with as much force as he could muster then fleeing, showing he understood his guilt, he loudly berated them demonstrating intent. But you want to endorse a lawyer attacking the police.

devildavid said:
On Jan 6 people destroyed property and broke into doors and windows. There were no peaceful tourists entering the Capitol. Peaceful tourists are let in by guides who show them around on a schedule. The also attacked the DC police violently. There was much violent and destructive actions by the Jan 6 rioters. The indictments were valid.
Click to expand...
Your comment demonstrates the collectivism of the Left. For political opponents cases are considered as a group, not as individuals as the rule of law requires.
 
AZRWinger said:
Typical Democrat political rationalization of an individual violently assaulting a police officer. Before throwing whatever he happened to have in his hand with as much force as he could muster then fleeing, showing he understood his guilt, he loudly berated them demonstrating intent. But you want to endorse a lawyer attacking the police.


Your comment demonstrates the collectivism of the Left. For political opponents cases are considered as a group, not as individuals as the rule of law requires.
Click to expand...

Nothing Democrat political about the text of the law. If something doesn’t reach the level of a felony offense, it just doesn’t. That is how it works when you screw up and try to reach too far in prosecuting a case.
 
devildavid said:
Nothing Democrat political about the text of the law. If something doesn’t reach the level of a felony offense, it just doesn’t. That is how it works when you screw up and try to reach too far in prosecuting a case.
Click to expand...
This is your second comment claiming knowledge of a law you don't quote. In addition you criticize the prosecutor for overreach despite the history of DC juries joining the resistance.
 
AZRWinger said:
False assumption the DC grand jury would reach a conclusion based on the law. Instead, they preferred mob rule to the rule of law.
Click to expand...
Your side has ZERO room to talk about rule of law. Your side does not follow the law and does not respect the constitution.

Those charges were bullshit and were treated as such.

Dumpletits and his ass-kissing goons lost.

1757271001949.webp
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom