• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump's team denies photographic evidence of turnout!

Conservative said:
Apparently GW Bush was in office for the 8 years of the Obama Administration and was responsible for the worst recovery in History. Since Bush never left office neither did Obama especially with the Congressional election results this past election where Hillary wasn't on the ballot for Congress but the Obama record was. Your hypocrisy noted
Click to expand...
Here is a clue for you. This thread is not about Obama. If you can muster enough integrity the address the topic of the thread. The ignorant drivel you that you are using as a diversion remains just that.

Then answer the question in post 356.
Click to expand...
I did.

All I have seen is anti Trump rhetoric
Click to expand...
I do not give a crap what you have seen. Stick to the topic if you can.

Compared to previous inaugurations I have seen no facts from you especially since no official count is ever given
Click to expand...
What facts are you looking for? That fewer people attended?
 
prometeus said:
The briefing was a stupid rant and lies. What is dishonest about that in my post?

Ask the idiot who made that stupid remark. He is the one who owes the apology to the President.
Click to expand...

there were no lies in the post as this Inauguration was the largest watched inauguration in the history of this country and that was explained quite well today in the briefing. Suggest you pay attention. There was more to the inauguration than just the attendance at the Malls

The only idiots making stupid remarks are those anti Trump supporters who truly are leftwing radicals who I am trying to figure out what you want? I don't see an apology to the President for the MLK Bust reference, please refresh my memory

It really is a shame that people like you have so much invested in radicalism and a particular ideology that you simply channel your hatred in the wrong direction. Still waiting for an answer to post 356
 
prometeus said:
Here is a clue for you. This thread is not about Obama. If you can muster enough integrity the address the topic of the thread. The ignorant drivel you that you are using as a diversion remains just that.

I did.

I do not give a crap what you have seen. Stick to the topic if you can.

What facts are you looking for? That fewer people attended?
Click to expand...

Without an official count how do you know? And yes this thread is about the Obama legacy and you people trying to delegitimize Trump
 
Conservative said:
there were no lies in the post as this Inauguration was the largest watched inauguration in the history of this country and that was explained quite well today in the briefing.
Click to expand...
Are you that naive? What evidence is there for that? Any and ALL evidence points to the contrary.

Suggest you pay attention.
Click to expand...
I did, you should try it too.

There was more to the inauguration than just the attendance at the Malls
Click to expand...
That is true.

I don't see an apology to the President for the MLK Bust reference
Click to expand...
You expect one from me for something some idiot did? I am curious how will that help anything?

It really is a shame that people like you have so much invested in radicalism
Click to expand...
What is a shame is that you make moronic assumptions about people you do not know.
 
Conservative said:
Without an official count how do you know?
Click to expand...
I have enough integrity to acknowledge facts, you clearly do not.

And yes this thread is about the Obama legacy and you people trying to delegitimize Trump
Click to expand...
No it is not. I suggest you have someone read the title for you and explain what it means. You are attempting to make it about Obama because you are unable to come up with a single intelligent an honest argument on the topic.
 
Conservative said:
Without an official count how do you know? And yes this thread is about the Obama legacy and you people trying to delegitimize Trump
Click to expand...

You don't need an official count when photos and time lapse videos show a clear difference in size, not to mention transit figures. I don't need to know the exact number of cells in a dog to know a labrador is smaller than a horse.

I don't even care about the numbers: D.C. is a strong Dem area and I would expect Trump to get a lower turnout. I do care about the bull**** spouted by Spicer and Trump, and Conway's Orwellesque references to alternative facts.
 
prometeus said:
Well in light of the undeniable fact that they started out by not telling the truth what the **** did you exactly expect?
Click to expand...

I expect the press to be unbiased and treat them fairly. Did they ask such a question of Obama's spokesmen when they were "lying" to them? No. But you are okay with this corrupt behavior by the press, because there is no longer a democrat in the WH.
 
Aristaeus said:
You don't need an official count when photos and time lapse videos show a clear difference in size, not to mention transit figures. I don't need to know the exact number of cells in a dog to know a labrador is smaller than a horse.

I don't even care about the numbers: D.C. is a strong Dem area and I would expect Trump to get a lower turnout. I do care about the bull**** spouted by Spicer and Trump, and Conway's Orwellesque references to alternative facts.
Click to expand...
Exactly so. I can not understand why such simple matters totally elude some people. Is it really a simple matter of sheer stupidity, a lack of integrity or both?
 
Conservative said:
Without an official count how do you know? And yes this thread is about the Obama legacy and you people trying to delegitimize Trump
Click to expand...

I made this thread and it is not about the Obama legacy or delegitimising Trump. It's about the blatent and ridiculously easy disprovable lies spouted by Spicer and Trump.

If Trump and his supporters hadn't have been determined to deny what everyone could see, we wouldn't be talking about this now. This only became a story because of Trump's reaction.
 
Anthony60 said:
I expect the press to be unbiased and treat them fairly.
Click to expand...
When you start out with a lie why is a question about that unfair?

Did they ask such a question of Obama's spokesmen when they were "lying" to them?
Click to expand...
Here is a clue to dispel the ignorant partisan hackery. Obama IS gone. Can you stick to the topic?
 
Aristaeus said:
You don't need an official count when photos and time lapse videos show a clear difference in size, not to mention transit figures. I don't need to know the exact number of cells in a dog to know a labrador is smaller than a horse.

I don't even care about the numbers: D.C. is a strong Dem area and I would expect Trump to get a lower turnout. I do care about the bull**** spouted by Spicer and Trump, and Conway's Orwellesque references to alternative facts.
Click to expand...

And I care about the lie spread by the liberal news media that trump removed MLK's bust from the Oval Office
 
prometeus said:
Exactly so. I can not understand why such simple matters totally elude some people. Is it really a simple matter of sheer stupidity, a lack of integrity or both?
Click to expand...

Hyper-partisanship. They have to defend their guy at all costs, even if that means denying reality.
 
Aristaeus said:
Well if you're going to blatently lie at your first press conference, what do you expect the press to ask?
Click to expand...

What a stupid question they asked, these moron hippocrates. They immediately lie about Trump right out of the gate, and have the nerve to ask a question like that. Liars have no right to ask about someone else's information until they start telling the truth themselves.
 
Aristaeus said:
Hyper-partisanship. They have to defend their guy at all costs, even if that means denying reality.
Click to expand...

And the knee jerk left has to attack the guy 24/7.

You get what you pay for
 
prometeus said:
When you start out with a lie why is a question about that unfair?

Here is a clue to dispel the ignorant partisan hackery. Obama IS gone. Can you stick to the topic?
Click to expand...

Oh, not able to answer that one, huh? So you are good with them treating Obama with kid gloves, but disrespecting our President now. Good to know what your standards are.
 
Anthony60 said:
So, listening to the press briefing today, ABC News just asked if they will be telling the truth at the press briefings. Can't make this up. First briefing. Did they ask that to any of Obama's briefings? That's what Trump is up against.
Click to expand...

Yes you can make it up, and they did.

The question was about "intent."

The question is at 23:44 in the video:

https://www.c-span.org/video/?422474-1/sean-spicer-holds-first-daily-briefing


Before I get to a policy question, just a question about the nature of your job. Is it your intention to always tell the truth from that podium, and will you pledge never to knowingly say something that is not factual?
​

Words have meaning.

Why didn't he ask Obama's press secretary that?

Expect anyone who will lie, to say "NO?"

What a stupid question.
 
Excon said:
They also have a gigapixel image and you can zoom in to see what areas were and were not filled in.


Gigapixel: The inauguration of Donald Trump
Click to expand...
Amazing. So now...the question is will all the people that spent 337 previous posts and numerous threads defending THIS picture

teh.webp

have the integrity to admit just how completely wrong they have been or will they just run off and hide.
 
Chomsky said:
Yep, and that's the problem.
Click to expand...
Why? Seriously...what do you think they could have accomplished with him? There is no evidence he is going to try to ban abortion. There is no evidence he has ever been anything but supportive of women in executive and leadership positions. SO as related to Trump...is it really ALL about a reprehensible comment he made 9 years ago? These same women that are SO beside themselves over a comment yet voted twice for Bill Clinton and eagerly rushed to the polls to vote for his wife who spent 4 decades attacking his victim. So their fake outrage is pretty pathetic.

Frankly...across the country a group of hactivist women got themselves worked up into a lather...held a cute protest...and went home. Who gives a ****?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom