- Joined
- Feb 3, 2017
- Messages
- 10,023
- Reaction score
- 3,470
- Location
- Midwest USA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
I happen to be very fond of Mexicans and Mexican heritage. I also like the Italians. The difference is that Italians came here legally; we knew who they were, we knew where they were, and they didn't have to use stolen SS/Green Card numbers, thereby screwing up the SS accounts and tax records of hundreds of thousands citizens and legal residents. That is the difference between controlled legal immigration and uncontrolled mass illegal immigration.
Personally, I don't care if they triple or quadruple the number of legal immigrants from Mexico and Central America; I just want to make sure the authorities know who's here, and where they are.
Also, there is a very large illegal population that is involved in criminal activity, so please, I've lived here all my adult life, and I've seen the massive changes that occurred since Reagan's amnesty proclamation (which I supported at the time). It's a problem for the people of this state, and my personal opinion is that "sanctuary cities" are basically green-lighting all the criminal activities that illegals must employ just to survive here as an undocumented worker.
Reagan was a worthless POS president; he gave ILLEGAL people the right to become legal; WTF is that about?
Why don't we all just go out, rob banks, and then we can all get amnesty for our ILLEGAL acts.
All while Reagan was creating an America for ILLEGALs he was busy ILLEGALLY selling arms to the Iranians.
Reagan had also 'busted' PATCO which had LEGAL right to strike.
Reagan was likely as bad as Lincoln; Lincoln = the worst violator of The Constitution.
If there truly is 'no rest for the wicked' then I'm confident both Lincoln & Reagan will never rest in peace ..........