Trump's Other Impeachable Offense

[hanger4]

I know what it is, and it is only part of a larger and far more complete thought. Look at what Mueller told Barr about his use of only partial fragments of large sentences like you favor. This dishonest tactic failed spectacularly for Barr two months ago and it fails for you every time you do the same and copy him. That says it all.

You can ignore the truth (head in sand) to your hearts desire, this;

“[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

did not change. The only way it can change is Mueller "did establish a conspiracy and coordination" and you know that's not true.

 

[haymarket]

You can ignore the truth (head in sand) to your hearts desire, this;

“[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”

did not change. The only way it can change is Mueller "did establish a conspiracy and coordination" and you know that's not true.

We have had the whole sentence, and the whole paragraph, and the whole report for quite a while now which shows how dishonest the previously cited cherry picked phrase was. Mueller told the word how wrong the Barr summary was for just those reasons.

But for some reason, you re the one still using it knowing full well how dishonest it is to pretend that is the be all and end all of the report. And that is fundamentally dishonest because we have over 440 pages which tell us much much much more which adds greatly to our understanding.

If the finding of Mueller was limited to that half of a larger sentence you so love - then you would have a point. But it is not and you do not.

 

[hanger4]

We have had the whole sentence, and the whole paragraph, and the whole report for quite a while now which shows how dishonest the previously cited cherry picked phrase was. Mueller told the word how wrong the Barr summary was for just those reasons.

But for some reason, you re the one still using it knowing full well how dishonest it is to pretend that is the be all and end all of the report. And that is fundamentally dishonest because we have over 440 pages which tell us much much much more which adds greatly to our understanding.

If the finding of Mueller was limited to that half of a larger sentence you so love - then you would have a point. But it is not and you do not.

Mueller never said his independent clause was incorrect. The entire sentence, paragraph or report did not change, "did not establish ....... a conspiracy or coordination.

How did "did not establish" change to "did establish" ??

 

[haymarket]

Mueller never said his independent clause was incorrect. The entire sentence, paragraph or report did not change, "did not establish ....... a conspiracy or coordination.

How did "did not establish" change to "did establish" ??

Much of the rest of the report paints a far different picture.

It is obvious that Trump and his roadie Barr missed this important sentence from the first Executive Summary

"A statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts."

Which changes potentially everything including your favorite cherry picked half of a sentence taken from a much larger thought and meaning.