Trump's judge loses in Wisconsin

[jpn]

I am sorry but...

What's that? Can't hear you over the partying going on!!!

The Republicans endangered people's lives in order to cling to power, but it didn't work!!!

If that's not worth celebrating, I don't know what is!!! Woo-hoo!

:2party: :2dancing: :cheers: :beer: :2dance:

 

[Robertinfremont]

I dont know about California...I just know that low intelligence types tend to pin all their hopes and dreams on the "thats racist" bull**** and the voter suppression bull**** is the biggest fairy tale they have. Idiot leftists will insist that its appropriate to have an ID, a license registration and a background check to exercise your Constitutional right to keep and bear arms, but showing an ID at a polling place? Why...thats racist! When all the Texas voter drama was going on they were INSISTING it was the republicans that were closing polling locations...and then i demonstrated...SHOWED THEM the actual people...democrat politicians and democrat election commissions in the counties and they STILL tried some fairy tale made up bull**** about how so what if it was the democrats that closed the polling locations it was still the republicans fault. Just...you know...because....

And now...after ****ting themselves and shrieking that they were repressed in Wisconsin, comes to find out they were not only NOT repressed, they had a higher than average turnout and they WON? Shows just how ****ing stupid their claims are.

but it wont stop them from making them.

I know. I have read their tripe on this for over 23 years of my posting on forums.

 

[Robertinfremont]

Fake concern, and if you really lived and/or voted in CA, you are well aware that signatures on either mail-in ballots or in voting poll sign-ins MUST match the signature on the original voter registration form, and are rigorously scrutinized and controlled.

Period.

Go play in another sandbox, instead of pissing in this one again.

I have no intentions to play where you live.

I understand signatures. And I pray that is my salvation. But so many Democrats count ballots. I am not assured they carefully watch such signatures nor are you positive they do.

Your sandbox is dirty. I mean very very dirty.

 

[GDViking]

Well that kinda makes your claim of voter suppression sound even MORE stupid.

you should take it up with your governor.

Currently due to gerrymandering both the state house and Senate are Republican...

 

[Robertinfremont]

This is a big win for democrat voters who want nothing but leftist democrat liberals appointed as judges, and is a defeat for conservatives who want conservatives as judges. I pray for more conservative judges because liberal judges have proven to be key instruments of change forcing changes in America away from God and toward barbarian ungodliness.

It is not as big a win as they want us to think it is. It has been 5-2 favoring republicans. When the female Judge is sworn in, it is 4-3. A clear advantage for republicans. Apparently Wisconson gets to vote them out. She better watch her step then.

 

[DiAnna]

I have no intentions to play where you live.

I understand signatures. And I pray that is my salvation. But so many Democrats count ballots. I am not assured they carefully watch such signatures nor are you positive they do.

Your sandbox is dirty. I mean very very dirty.

:lol:

In other words, you got caught telling a whopper and now are trying to wriggle out of it. Been here most of my life, have worked in city/county officers, seen and been officially part of the ballot handling, vote counting process. California vote counts are probably the most accurate in the nation, and have the best paper-trail to prove it.

Again, go find another sandbox to piss in; this one is pristine and beyond reproach.

 

[Threegoofs]

It is not as big a win as they want us to think it is. It has been 5-2 favoring republicans. When the female Judge is sworn in, it is 4-3. A clear advantage for republicans. Apparently Wisconson gets to vote them out. She better watch her step then.

Whew!

Thank God.

My investment in that planned parenthood clinic just below the IL/WI border is really gonna pay off!

 

[Robertinfremont]

Whew!

Thank God.

My investment in that planned parenthood clinic just below the IL/WI border is really gonna pay off!

I will pass this one favor to you. Buy Boeing. Hold Boeing.

 

[Robertinfremont]

:lol:

In other words, you got caught telling a whopper and now are trying to wriggle out of it. Been here most of my life, have worked in city/county officers, seen and been officially part of the ballot handling, vote counting process. California vote counts are probably the most accurate in the nation, and have the best paper-trail to prove it.

Again, go find another sandbox to piss in; this one is pristine and beyond reproach.

I read your taunts and insults as refusal to discuss.

And your sandbox is not up here.

Which is why I do not attend that box.

As to you saying we can be flat guaranteed that Alameda Co has no fraud, I do not accept that claim.

 

[DiAnna]

I read your taunts and insults as refusal to discuss.

And your sandbox is not up here.

Which is why I do not attend that box.

As to you saying we can be flat guaranteed that Alameda Co has no fraud, I do not accept that claim.

I don't care. You have no evidence, just yapping your partisan opinion on a debate forum. My experience over decades of dealing with, observing, and contributing to California elections convinces me otherwise, so unless you have something beyond "democrats in California count ballots" so there MUST be fraud, it's just so much hot air to me.

I'm actually just letting other people, who might not be familiar with how damned rigorous and heavily controlled ballots in this state are, not to believe the ravings of someone who proudly proclaims to hate this state and pretty much everything about it.

Have a nice evening.

P.S. My sandbox is up here as well, and I have every right to post. Why... what were you talking about? :lol:

 

[Robertinfremont]

I don't care. You have no evidence, just yapping your partisan opinion on a debate forum. My experience over decades of dealing with, observing, and contributing to California elections convinces me otherwise, so unless you have something beyond "democrats in California count ballots" so there MUST be fraud, it's just so much hot air to me.

I'm actually just letting other people, who might not be familiar with how damned rigorous and heavily controlled ballots in this state are, not to believe the ravings of someone who proudly proclaims to hate this state and pretty much everything about it.

Have a nice evening.

P.S. My sandbox is up here as well, and I have every right to post. Why... what were you talking about? :lol:

Chase is on.

Show us all your alleged evidence.

SHOW US.

 

[Puigb]

The sad thing is we were here before, in 2008. GOP crashes the car, Dem's fix it. Rinse and Repeat.

You forgot to mention that the Dems also get blamed for the car crash. Trump will leave a giant orange turd all over the nation for Biden and the Dems to clean up.

 

[calamity]

This is a big win for democrat voters who want nothing but leftist democrat liberals appointed as judges, and is a defeat for conservatives who want conservatives as judges. I pray for more conservative judges because liberal judges have proven to be key instruments of change forcing changes in America away from God and toward barbarian ungodliness.

What a stupid post...clearly not one replying to anything said in the post quoted..

 

[Digger]

This is a big win for democrat voters who want nothing but leftist democrat liberals appointed as judges, and is a defeat for conservatives who want conservatives as judges. I pray for more conservative judges because liberal judges have proven to be key instruments of change forcing changes in America away from God and toward barbarian ungodliness.

So liberal judges enforce the constitution when it says that "Congress shall pass no law respecting an establishment of religion," and conservatives want to take over the courts so that they can install a theocracy. Some of us had noticed, but thank you for making it so very clear.

 

[The AntiDonald]

I think its funny that you people act like a Woody doll regurgitating the same stupid recorded messages over and over and over not realizing the only people you are painting as clowns are yourselves.

But we keep winning.

 

[marke]

So liberal judges enforce the constitution when it says that "Congress shall pass no law respecting an establishment of religion," and conservatives want to take over the courts so that they can install a theocracy. Some of us had noticed, but thank you for making it so very clear.

Liberals interpret the Constitution in some ways which are in sharp contrast and contradiction with conservative interpretations. I generally favor conservative interpretations. The fact that so many court decisions are split decisions is evidence that human laws are not as irrefutably unchangeable as people might like to think.

 

[jpn]

This is a big win for democrat voters who want nothing but leftist democrat liberals appointed as judges, and is a defeat for conservatives who want conservatives as judges. I pray for more conservative judges because liberal judges have proven to be key instruments of change forcing changes in America away from God and toward barbarian ungodliness.

No, it was a big win for Democratic voters who want nothing but rational moderates and liberals appointed as judges, and is a defeat for conservatives who want far-right Republican reactionary zealots as judges. I hope for more rational moderate to liberal judges because conservative judges have proven to be key instruments of change forcing changes in America away from kindness and toward barbaric intolerance and judgement.

 

[calamity]

Liberals interpret the Constitution in some ways which are in sharp contrast and contradiction with conservative interpretations. I generally favor conservative interpretations. The fact that so many court decisions are split decisions is evidence that human laws are not as irrefutably unchangeable as people might like to think.

So, if Sharia Law was in place, you'd be good with that. Or is it only the "laws" of your religion that are acceptable?

 

[j brown's body]

What a stupid post...clearly not one replying to anything said in the post quoted..

It wouldn't seem so stupid if it could have been posted in the 1800s.

 

[j brown's body]

No, it was a big win for Democratic voters who want nothing but rational moderates and liberals appointed as judges, and is a defeat for conservatives who want far-right Republican reactionary zealots as judges. I hope for more rational moderate to liberal judges because conservative judges have proven to be key instruments of change forcing changes in America away from kindness and toward barbaric intolerance and judgement.

On a very basic level, conservative judges tend to side with corporations, liberal judges tend to side with workers and consumers. Conservative judges side with government that want people to risk their lives to vote, purge voter roles, demand IDs to vote and the closing of polls and hours to vote, and liberal judges side with voting rights for citizens.

 

[jpn]

On a very basic level, conservative judges tend to side with corporations, liberal judges tend to side with workers and consumers. Conservative judges side with government that want people to risk their lives to vote, purge voter roles, demand IDs to vote and the closing of polls and hours to vote, and liberal judges side with voting rights for citizens.

Absolutely right. Follow the big money, you'll find sympathetic conservative judges.

Also, conservative judges also tend to side with the harsh, judgmental Old Testament Christianity while liberal judges tend to side on the New Testament's emphasis on compassion.

Funny how that goes.

 

[VanceMack]

But we keep winning.

Do you? Do you really?

Even IF you won everything...look what you have.

And then look at that word 'winning'.

 

[calamity]

Do you? Do you really?

Even IF you won everything...look what you have.

And then look at that word 'winning'.

Kicking the Nazis out of office is definitely winning for most of us.

 

[VanceMack]

Kicking the Nazis out of office is definitely winning for most of us.

:lamo

"nazis"

How ****ing stupid. Not unexpected...but still....

 

[Threegoofs]

Do you? Do you really?

Even IF you won everything...look what you have.

And then look at that word 'winning'.

What?

Are you saying there’s not ‘so much winning’?

I was promised so much winning I’d be sick of it.

Now I’m getting so much winning that hundreds of thousands of people are getting sick.