* * *Trump's illegal call to Ukraine was for his own personal benefit??

[bomberfox]

yes when Durham /IG reports indict deep state officials for coup against sitting president it will be huge!! More than priceless! Say hello to Donald's second term!!

:lamo. Hows those benghazi hearings going for you? Mueller actually indicted several people in his investigation.

 

[Grand Mal]

impeachable must be non partisan. This has no Republican support and is just to reverse an election they lost, a coup. Liberal Senators send letter to Ukraine saying investigate Trump or else and Democrats were fine with that. Now do you understand?

Pack of lies. There's been three impeachment processes in my lifetime and none have been non-partisan. And you guys need to learn what 'coup' means. Impeachment is a legal process.
Odd though that previous impeachment were handled by special prosecutors and this one is being handled by the Congress. Maybe the Congress will appoint a prosecuted still. What would you say to that?

 

[Grand Mal]

:lamo. Hows those benghazi hearings going for you? Mueller actually indicted several people in his investigation.

30someodd, including 25 for directly interfering in the election, and conservatives still say it all should have stayed covered up.

 

[James972]

Pack of lies. There's been three impeachment processes in my lifetime and none have been non-partisan.

but they are supposed to be according to Founders otherwise it is just a unconstitutionally way to win an election. Do you understand??

 

[James972]

Pack of lies. There's been three impeachment processes in my lifetime and none have been non-partisan. And you guys need to learn what 'coup' means. Impeachment is a legal process.
Odd though that previous impeachment were handled by special prosecutors and this one is being handled by the Congress. Maybe the Congress will appoint a prosecuted still. What would you say to that?

they did his name was Mueller and he found nothing despite the power for years to arrest imprison and intimidate people to say what he wanted.

 

[James972]

: Mueller actually indicted several people in his investigation.

but found no collusion with Trump and matter was dropped despite years of dogged gestapo tactics!! And now it seems Mueller and others will go to prison for the gestapo tactics that yielded nothing!!!

 

[What if...?]

* * *Trump's illegal call to Ukraine was for his own personal benefit??

So the president can't do anything for his own personal benefit??

Can he make the economy boom?

Can he make peace in the Middle East?

Idk. Can you post a graph with this "trump bump"

Is there peace in the middle east?

His about he tax you 100% so he can play a round of golf with the money?

Please answer these questions so that I can answer yohrs

 

[Grand Mal]

but they are supposed to be according to Founders otherwise it is just a unconstitutionally way to win an election. Do you understand??

Show me.

 

[James972]

There is actually no formal requirement for it to be bipartisan in the constitution.

it is formal as intended by Founders otherwise it would simply amount to another election. Got it now??

 

[Grand Mal]

they did his name was Mueller and he found nothing despite the power for years to arrest imprison and intimidate people to say what he wanted.

Don't be an ass. Mueller was an investigater, not a prosecuter, and he was appointed and answered to the Trump administration. He indicted 34 people, including 25 for directly interfering in the election. You think that what he found out should have stayed covered up? Wow, quite the patriot, aren't you. That'd be some message to send to the Russians- "Come help yourself!"
Tell you this, if you think his investigation was a waste of time and money it was the Trump administration doing the wasting. But I don't expect you can understand that.

 

[James972]

Don't be an ass. Mueller was an investigater, not a prosecuter,

Yes and there was nothing found and no need for a prosecutor despite years of investigation using gestapo tactics so over the line that he will now in theory be imprisoned for them.

 

[James972]

You think that what he found out should have stayed covered up?

if I think that I"ll pay you $10,000. Bet or run away with your liberal tail between your legs yet again.

 

[Grand Mal]

Yes and there was nothing found and no need for a prosecutor despite years of investigation using gestapo tactics so over the line that he will now in theory be imprisoned for them.

34 indictments, 25 for interfering in the election.
Don't you pay any attention? Would it distract you from creating your fantasies?

Edit- How will he be theoretically imprisoned? You live in a strange, wonderful world.

 

[Grand Mal]

if I think that I"ll pay you $10,000. Bet or run away with your liberal tail between your legs yet again.

I thought I told you not to be an ass.

 

[James972]

I thought I told you not to be an ass.

there you go. lost another debate and switch to personal attack. Ever see a conservative have to run from a debate??

 

[James972]

34 indictments, 25 for interfering in the election.

and????????? You clean forgot to say what you point is????????????

 

[bomberfox]

it is formal as intended by Founders otherwise it would simply amount to another election. Got it now??

They were very deliberate and we didnt have much in the way of parties for some time. Still no mention of bipartisanship. Your opinion is noted.

 

[bomberfox]

there you go. lost another debate and switch to personal attack. Ever see a conservative have to run from a debate??

All the time when it doesnt involve a freshman college student.Why wont Dave Rubin debate Sam Seder? I want that debate!

 

[James972]

All the time

dear, talking about here. No examples??????? What does that teach you???

 

[James972]

Still no mention of bipartisanship.

???? can you tell us what you mean??? Any idea???

 

[Bullseye]

Get over it Bullseye.

Still working the "Biden truths" eh? I'll stick to facts.

 

[Grand Mal]

and????????? You clean forgot to say what you point is????????????

If you can't follow a simple discussion maybe you need to try a different pastime.

 

[Grand Mal]

there you go. lost another debate and switch to personal attack. Ever see a conservative have to run from a debate??

Tell you what I never saw. I never saw anyone but an idiot propose an arrangement involving money with a random stranger on the internet.
You can't answer a single point I've raised here and you've admitted you're incapable of following the line of discussion. You're just terrible at this. Maybe the worst on this site.

 

[James972]

Still working the "Biden truths" eh? I'll stick to facts.

The fact is Biden took $50,000 a month and laundered it through his son. You know a communistic banana republic is coming when they try to make it a crime to investigate corruption.

 

[James972]

They were very deliberate and we didnt have much in the way of parties for some time. Still no mention of bipartisanship. Your opinion is noted.

Hamilton and others clearly said that impeachment was for non-partisan events. Partisan events We’re to be handled by elections and other constitutional processes described in the constitution. Now do you understand?