Trumpian Division of Americans Continues (1 Viewer)

[bluesmoke]

Are you a racist or other part of the group she was referring to? If not you were not mentioned by Hillary. Of course you little snowflakes rallied around your victimhood mentality.

Typical of Trumpsters to take things out of context, like the speaker's definition of "deplorables": “You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right?” Clinton said. “The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamaphobic—you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up.”

 

[bongsaway]

Now he's calling Democrats traitors...and using it as an excuse to violate the constitution.

Trump, at Ohio rally, says Democrats would have leaked Soleimani attack plans | Fox News



That nonsense reminds me of Oliver North shredding documents so that the "real enemy" (Congress) can't see them. I guess their playbook hasn't changed much since back in the day.

Sad thing is so many on the Right believe this completely. Hence, it makes that silly rhetoric somewhat dangerous. Does it not?

Add in the congressman who declared dems love the terrorists and it's really easy to see who the enemy of the people in america really is, republicans.

 

[calamity]

We have a president who doesn’t respect:

The Constitution
Democracy
Rule of law
Allies
American values
Human values
Belief in facts
Commitment to education

But yet it’s supposedly Democrats who are traitors.


Is there anyone left on the Right who finds this odd?

 

[holbritter]

The full quote. Fun and accurate.

"Can you imagine calling Crooked Adam Schiff? He's so crooked. So crooked. Shifty Schiff. Say, "Gee, Adam, how you're doing? Listen — we have the world's number one terrorist who's killed thousands and thousands of people. We'd like to set up a meeting so we can discuss his execution. Would you be willing to meet?"

"Well, I won't be able to make it this week."
"Well, you know, he's traveling fast. We've got it lined up, Adam. You little pencil neck." [Huge cheers.]
Nine inches. He buys the smallest shirt collar you can get, and it's loose.
"Now, come on, Adam. We've got to meet faster, Adam. We've got him lined up. We've got to take this guy out. We're not going to have another shot at him, maybe ever again."
"But I can't make it now because I'm trying to impeach Trump. Even thought he did nothing wrong."
[snip]
Now Schiff is a big leaker. You know, he leaks to crazy CNN, see with the little red light on them [pointing to cameras]. Not too many people are watching CNN.
But he leaks. So he'll say, "You know, ah, off the record, I got to hurry up because everyone's watching me in the hallway on my cell phone. Off the record, they've got the number one terrorist in the world, Soleimani, and they're going to get him, they're going to take him out, in the next ten minutes. Please don't tell anybody I told you."
"We have breaking news: President Trump, within the next twenty, twenty-five minutes looks to be taking out terrorist General Soleimani. He's going to do it. Should be happening in about the next twenty minutes, nineteen, eighteen, seventeen.
Then we get back to the battlefield. "How did you do?"
"I don't know, Sir. He disappeared. I don't know what happened to him."
They want us to tell them so they can leak it to their friends in the corrupt media.






Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk

What a freaking toddler he is.

 

[calamity]

If you need links to the most popular news stories, then you are way out of your league here. Didn't know you were so misinformed.

I see the Right learned nothing from Mexico paying for the Wall and Trump locking Hillary up. It’s like stupid people will believe anything, even after seeing the guy feeding them lies has been full of **** for years.

 

[Lovebug]

What a freaking toddler he is.

Meaning anyone can become potus, contrary to what some want us to think.

 

[calamity]

So, tell us, calamity, how is the country suffering because of Trump's terrible leadership? Other than you and your friends not liking him, just what is Trump doing that is hurting the country as it succeeds economically and militarily? Oh, I know, Orange Man bad; Liberal candidates good.
If he is such a terrible leader why doesn't the majority just vote him out in November? Wouldn't that be the democratic to do and not what stupid Pelosi is trying to do with the impeachment witch hunt that will go nowhere? Oh, I know, the Democrats are afraid that with the terrible candidates they are fielding, they have to come up with other ways of damaging the Trump presidency so that he loses in November..

You call Big Government handing farmers $30 billion to keep them from going under “succeeding”? There was a time Conservatives called it socialism.

 

[calamity]

Meaning anyone can become potus, contrary to what some want us to think.

Scary.

 

[Condor060]

I see the Right learned nothing from Mexico paying for the Wall and Trump locking Hillary up. It’s like stupid people will believe anything, even after seeing the guy feeding them lies has been full of **** for years.

So you only know about main stream news when its against Trump. How convenient for you.

 

[calamity]

So you only know about main stream news when its against Trump. How convenient for you.

Ah, so in non-MSM-land Mexico paid for the wall and the Hillary investigation yielded felonies. :roll:

Meanwhile, in the real world, Trump robbed the military budget for his stupid wall and the only felonies are those landing on the doorsteps of Trumpkins.

Tell me, in WingnutLand, is Duncan Hunter still the Congressman of So Cal?

 

[Condor060]

Ah, so in non-MSM-land Mexico paid for the wall and the Hillary investigation yielded felonies. :roll:

They did? I must have missed where the media stated that. Oh, you just made it up.

Meanwhile, in the real world, Trump robbed the military budget for his stupid wall

So you now admit you don't know the powers of the office? You didn't know that it is within the power of the presidency to take those actions?
So what was it when Democrats built over 700 miles of it? Hypocrisy at its best huh.

and the only felonies are those landing on the doorsteps of Trumpkins.

So you are telling me that with all these felonies, Democrats are just too stupid to be able to hold him accountable? Figures.

Tell me, in WingnutLand, is Duncan Hunter still the Congressman of So Cal?

Don't even know what that means. But it does show how far you will go to deflect from the fact that you can't even recall the top 20 media stories found to be fake news over the last 3 years. How convenient for you. Sounds more like selective memory coupled with fake outrage.

 

[Irwin Corey]

If you need links to the most popular news stories, then you are way out of your league here. Didn't know you were so misinformed.

You can't provide links to your tired party line accusations. This site is called "Debate Politics" last time I was in a debate we had to document all of our points; or a least be ready and able to. You've never documented any of your wild accusations; if you can't document what you claim then it's you that's "out of your league" on a site dedicated to "DEBATE". I'm not "misinformed", but it appears you are ill-informed. But, even worse, you don't care; you happily propagate rightwing nonsense and then denigrate anyone that calls you on it.

The reason I called you on documentation was to illustrate how ill-informed you are and that you really don't care that you are; propagating hatred of the left with lies is your mission.

 

[Irwin Corey]

They did? I must have missed where the media stated that. Oh, you just made it up.

:2rofll: even your (notso) cleaver comebacks are stupidly partisan. :doh

So you now admit you don't know the powers of the office? You didn't know that it is within the power of the presidency to take those actions?

I'm sure Calam knows what a President can do; but was pointing out that taking money from the military, to build a wall Mexico was going to pay for, earmarked to build schools is NOT something he should do.

So what was it when Democrats built over 700 miles of it? Hypocrisy at its best huh.

NO, not hypocrisy, in any stretch of the imagination; and it was just Democrats that built those 700 miles; hypocrite much? What is was, was using properly appropriated and approved funds for boarder security; I thought you were for that? Bush Jr. was.

So you are telling me that with all these felonies, Democrats are just too stupid to be able to hold him accountable? Figures.

NO, we're saying that working within the bound of the Constitution, it's impossible to investigate a president and his administration that are willing to stomp on the Constitution to hide his crimes.

But it does show how far you will go to deflect from the fact that you can't even recall the top 20 media stories found to be fake news over the last 3 years.

Please document those "20 media stories" so we can all be inlightened.

How convenient for you. Sounds more like selective memory coupled with fake outrage.

It's easy not to have to remember facts, even selectively, when you can, and do, just make **** up as you go along and never document a thing; as you like to do.

 

[Condor060]

You can't provide links to your tired party line accusations. This site is called "Debate Politics" last time I was in a debate we had to document all of our points; or a least be ready and able to. You've never documented any of your wild accusations; if you can't document what you claim then it's you that's "out of your league" on a site dedicated to "DEBATE". I'm not "misinformed", but it appears you are ill-informed. But, even worse, you don't care; you happily propagate rightwing nonsense and then denigrate anyone that calls you on it.

The reason I called you on documentation was to illustrate how ill-informed you are and that you really don't care that you are; propagating hatred of the left with lies is your mission.

Ok fair enough. So to make sure we are both on the same page, What I posted shown below, are (according to you) wild accusations that you are completely unaware of. I make that statement as most people don't require links to the more prevalent news cycles but you are confessing you have no clue and need links to verify the information.

So I have numbered the claims I made to make this easy for you. You can provide the numbers of the claims you have no clue about and I will provide you with a host of links for each.

So tell us which of these claims are outside of your knowledge base so I can provide you with links?

1. Adam Schiff continued to leak selective parts of testimony from closed door sessions during the hearings depositions to the media

2. Adam Schiff secretly confiscated and leaked phone conversations of opposing political party members (Nunes) then was found to have knowingly falsified their content to the media

3. Adam Schiff claimed to have undisputed evidence of Trump colluding with Russians to effect the outcome of an election since the Muller investigation started and continued to tell America on several news broadcast over and over

4. Adam Schiff stated he didn't know who the whistle blower was but got caught lying about it when everyone found out his staff was actually working with him

5. Adam Schiff was so desperate for opposition research that he even fell for a prank by a Ukrainian who offered him nude photographs of the president on a recorded line

6. Adam Schiff dramatized rendition of the president’s call with Zelensky that bore no resemblance to the publicly available transcript released by the White House was a Sopranos hit job for effect.

 

[less right]

It isn't the money, its the support. When Bloomberg or any other candidate raises over 350 million, let us know

Where's the supporting donation data for the independents you claimed?

 

[calamity]

They did? I must have missed where the media stated that. Oh, you just made it up.



So you now admit you don't know the powers of the office? You didn't know that it is within the power of the presidency to take those actions?
So what was it when Democrats built over 700 miles of it? Hypocrisy at its best huh.



So you are telling me that with all these felonies, Democrats are just too stupid to be able to hold him accountable? Figures.



Don't even know what that means. But it does show how far you will go to deflect from the fact that you can't even recall the top 20 media stories found to be fake news over the last 3 years. How convenient for you. Sounds more like selective memory coupled with fake outrage.

Trunpkins being Trumpkins. Cult perfectly describes the fealty they give Der Leader.

Always remember, it didn't end well for the people of Jonestown.

 

[Condor060]

Where's the supporting donation data for the independents you claimed?

As soon as you show me in my post where I stated that, I will.

More than happy to share.

The highest amount raised by a presidential candidate was Obama at 146 million with 41% of that being voters under $200 each

Trump is over 350 million, with a year to go, and 63% of that is from voters at $200 or less. He raised another 30 million during the impeachment hearings

The DNC is broke with 8 million in cash and 25 million in unpaid bills while the RNC has over 90 million in cash

All 20 Democrat candidates raised less than 100 million COMBINED.

The number and support speaks for itself.

 

[less right]

So what was it when Democrats built over 700 miles of it?

Funded by congressional legislation?

 

[redbeer]

Now he's calling Democrats traitors...and using it as an excuse to violate the constitution.

Trump, at Ohio rally, says Democrats would have leaked Soleimani attack plans | Fox News



That nonsense reminds me of Oliver North shredding documents so that the "real enemy" (Congress) can't see them. I guess their playbook hasn't changed much since back in the day.

Sad thing is so many on the Right believe this completely. Hence, it makes that silly rhetoric somewhat dangerous. Does it not?

These people have more leaks than a baby's diaper.....they lie so much it's not even funny, so why should Trump trust these goons? Especially with matters of "national security"....no way, they are not worthy.

 

[less right]

As soon as you show me in my post where I stated that, I will.

We love it and so do independent voters.

Let's see the data supporting "so do independent voters".

 

[Condor060]

They did? I must have missed where the media stated that. Oh, you just made it up.

even your (notso) cleaver comebacks are stupidly partisan.

So when did Mexico pay for the wall and the Hillary investigation yield felonies?

Quote Originally Posted by Condor060 View Post
So you now admit you don't know the powers of the office? You didn't know that it is within the power of the presidency to take those actions?

I'm sure Calam knows what a President can do; but was pointing out that taking money from the military, to build a wall Mexico was going to pay for, earmarked to build schools is NOT something he should do.

Now you're stating what other people mean? Typical. He stated Trump robbed the military to pay for the wall. If you can't keep up you really shouldn't interject what you think others are thinking. But its what Liberals do.

Quote Originally Posted by Condor060 View Post
So what was it when Democrats built over 700 miles of it? Hypocrisy at its best huh.

NO, not hypocrisy, in any stretch of the imagination; and it was just Democrats that built those 700 miles; hypocrite much? What is was, was using properly appropriated and approved funds for boarder security; I thought you were for that? Bush Jr. was

.

So for the uneducated on the subject, EVERY democrat who voted for the wall before Trump, voted against it under Trump. Does that clear it up for you or are you just too far inside that bubble to know the difference.

Quote Originally Posted by Condor060 View Post
So you are telling me that with all these felonies, Democrats are just too stupid to be able to hold him accountable? Figures.

NO, we're saying that working within the bound of the Constitution, it's impossible to investigate a president and his administration that are willing to stomp on the Constitution to hide his crimes.

So what did you think 50 FBI agents, 2 dozen CIA officials, 17 super lawyers, and 2500 witnesses were doing? That is most likely the dumbest statement ever recorded on DP.

Quote Originally Posted by Condor060 View Post
But it does show how far you will go to deflect from the fact that you can't even recall the top 20 media stories found to be fake news over the last 3 years.

Please document those "20 media stories" so we can all be inlightened.

When you learn how to spell enlightened I will. Now I understand why you wouldn't know what the top stories would be.

Quote Originally Posted by Condor060 View Post
How convenient for you. Sounds more like selective memory coupled with fake outrage.

It's easy not to have to remember facts, even selectively, when you can, and do, just make **** up as you go along and never document a thing; as you like to do.

Is that even a sentence? :lamo

 

[Irwin Corey]

Ok fair enough. So to make sure we are both on the same page, What I posted shown below, are (according to you) wild accusations that you are completely unaware of. I make that statement as most people don't require links to the more prevalent news cycles but you are confessing you have no clue and need links to verify the information.

So I have numbered the claims I made to make this easy for you. You can provide the numbers of the claims you have no clue about and I will provide you with a host of links for each.

So tell us which of these claims are outside of your knowledge base so I can provide you with links?

1. Adam Schiff continued to leak selective parts of testimony from closed door sessions during the hearings depositions to the media

2. Adam Schiff secretly confiscated and leaked phone conversations of opposing political party members (Nunes) then was found to have knowingly falsified their content to the media

3. Adam Schiff claimed to have undisputed evidence of Trump colluding with Russians to effect the outcome of an election since the Muller investigation started and continued to tell America on several news broadcast over and over

4. Adam Schiff stated he didn't know who the whistle blower was but got caught lying about it when everyone found out his staff was actually working with him

5. Adam Schiff was so desperate for opposition research that he even fell for a prank by a Ukrainian who offered him nude photographs of the president on a recorded line

6. Adam Schiff dramatized rendition of the president’s call with Zelensky that bore no resemblance to the publicly available transcript released by the White House was a Sopranos hit job for effect.

Too long, no documentation; didn't read or tlnddr.

Your mission is to promote a lying criminal president and foster hate of over 1/2 of your fellow Americans; got it. :2wave:

 

[Condor060]

Too long, no documentation; didn't read or tlnddr.

Your mission is to promote a lying criminal president and foster hate of over 1/2 of your fellow Americans; got it. :2wave:

So all of your lying and fake outrage just got exposed. Hurts doesn't it.

You pissed and moaned and cried and whined about providing links and when you got called out on the carpet you ran and hid like the good little coward liberal you where trained to be. :lamo

So tell us which of these claims are outside of your knowledge base so I can provide you with links?

1. Adam Schiff continued to leak selective parts of testimony from closed door sessions during the hearings depositions to the media

2. Adam Schiff secretly confiscated and leaked phone conversations of opposing political party members (Nunes) then was found to have knowingly falsified their content to the media

3. Adam Schiff claimed to have undisputed evidence of Trump colluding with Russians to effect the outcome of an election since the Muller investigation started and continued to tell America on several news broadcast over and over

4. Adam Schiff stated he didn't know who the whistle blower was but got caught lying about it when everyone found out his staff was actually working with him

5. Adam Schiff was so desperate for opposition research that he even fell for a prank by a Ukrainian who offered him nude photographs of the president on a recorded line

6. Adam Schiff dramatized rendition of the president’s call with Zelensky that bore no resemblance to the publicly available transcript released by the White House was a Sopranos hit job for effect.

 

[Condor060]

Let's see the data supporting "so do independent voters".

So just like the good little Liberal you were groomed to be, you couldn't find anything where I posted Independents were donating to Trump so you took another conversation out of context to make up your lie.

I NEVER claimed anything about Independents donating to Trump. But you got caught making up yet another out of context lie. And for what?

Nobody said anything about Trump and nobody needs Trump to know the antics of Adam Schiff.

Nobody cares that you love Adam Schiff. But voters have a different idea. You saw it in 2016 and you're going to see it again in 2020.

But please keep explaining how Schiff is your guy. We love it and so do independent voters.

 

[Irwin Corey]

So when did Mexico pay for the wall and the Hillary investigation yield felonies?

Are you arguing for my points now?

Now you're stating what other people mean? Typical. He stated Trump robbed the military to pay for the wall. If you can't keep up you really shouldn't interject what you think others are thinking. But its what Liberals do.

No, just commenting on what he/she said. In essence tRump DID take military funds earmarked to benefit Military family's and use them for domestic purposes; you call it what you want but I call that stealing too. OH, when did you become a board moderator that can judge what I can or can't post? You didn't, I didn't think so; your a control freak, aren't you? Again putting people down, especially those YOU judge "liberal" -sad

So for the uneducated on the subject, EVERY democrat who voted for the wall before Trump, voted against it under Trump. Does that clear it up for you or are you just too far inside that bubble to know the difference.

OH, it think everyone was clear that it was a bipartisan effort that built 700 miles of boarder wall. Whereas tRumps 5 billion dollar request was to build unnecessary and overpriced walls that wouldn't work, and effort led by White Supremacist Stephen Miller. That should clear up the difference for YOU.

So what did you think 50 FBI agents, 2 dozen CIA officials, 17 super lawyers, and 2500 witnesses were doing?

Nice try at deflection by you know what I was referring to is BARR, Mulvaney, Pompeo all trumps tea party henchmen in Congress and the Senate STOMPING on the Constitution to protect a criminal president that they deem just the CON-MAN to supplant our Constitutional PRESIDENCY with a dictator facsimile of a presidency.

That is most likely the dumbest statement ever recorded on DP.

I wouldn't have said that, but YES yours was; you really like to make yourself big by putting other people down. -sad

When you learn how to spell enlightened I will. Now I understand why you wouldn't know what the top stories would be.

Again you really like to put people down so you can feel big; don't you little man. And thank god I misspelled a word or how would you have deflected you lack of documentation … AGAIN!

Is that even a sentence? :lamo

Yes, it was put, it through a grammar checker if you like. But putting people down to make your little person complex feel big when you have no argument is your go to; isn't it. -even sadder