• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump will delay any additional increase in Chinese Tariffs

Bucky

Bucky

DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 5, 2015
Messages
30,419
Reaction score
7,168
Location
Washington
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
I am pleased to report that the U.S. has made substantial progress in our trade talks with China on important structural issues including intellectual property protection, technology transfer, agriculture, services, currency, and many other issues. As a result of these very......

....productive talks, I will be delaying the U.S. increase in tariffs now scheduled for March 1. Assuming both sides make additional progress, we will be planning a Summit for President Xi and myself, at Mar-a-Lago, to conclude an agreement. A very good weekend for U.S. & China!
Click to expand...

Donald J. Trump on Twitter: "I am pleased to report that the U.S. has made substantial progress in our trade talks with China on important structural issues including intellectual property protection, technology transfer, agriculture, services, currency, and many other issues. As a result of these very......"

This is good news. A historic deal could very likely be around the corner.
 
Bucky, tell us about the 7.5 billion dollars Trump has spent to offset the massive losses experienced by farmers due to Trump's tariffs.
 
Risky Thicket said:
Bucky, tell us about the 7.5 billion dollars Trump has spent to offset the massive losses experienced by farmers due to Trump's tariffs.
Click to expand...

Did Trump spend that? Or Congress?
 
Mycroft, I have long had you on ignore because I have found no value in anything you have posted. In the recent past there has been no documentation supporting your positions. I have rarely, if ever, found that you have submitted a documented and/or convincing argument. Ever.

In that regard, while I have received notification of your direct response to my post in this thread I have no ****ing idea what you said. None. Further, based on your posting history, I am most confident that I haven't missed jack ****.
 
Risky Thicket said:
Mycroft, I have long had you on ignore because I have found no value in anything you have posted. In the recent past there has been no documentation supporting your positions. I have rarely, if ever, found that you have submitted a documented and/or convincing argument. Ever.

In that regard, while I have received notification of your direct response to my post in this thread I have no ****ing idea what you said. None. Further, based on your posting history, I am most confident that I haven’t missed jack ****.
Click to expand...
Nope, you haven’t.
 
Risky Thicket said:
Bucky, tell us about the 7.5 billion dollars Trump has spent to offset the massive losses experienced by farmers due to Trump's tariffs.
Click to expand...

Unfortunate but the new agreement will include a $30 billion, yes billion for u.s agricultural purchases.
 
 
Risky Thicket said:
Mycroft, I have long had you on ignore because I have found no value in anything you have posted. In the recent past there has been no documentation supporting your positions. I have rarely, if ever, found that you have submitted a documented and/or convincing argument. Ever.

In that regard, while I have received notification of your direct response to my post in this thread I have no ****ing idea what you said. None. Further, based on your posting history, I am most confident that I haven't missed jack ****.
Click to expand...
Speaking of documentation: Got any for your claim of $7.5 billion cost to farmers? Thanks in advance.
 
Risky Thicket said:
Mycroft, I have long had you on ignore because I have found no value in anything you have posted. In the recent past there has been no documentation supporting your positions. I have rarely, if ever, found that you have submitted a documented and/or convincing argument. Ever.

In that regard, while I have received notification of your direct response to my post in this thread I have no ****ing idea what you said. None. Further, based on your posting history, I am most confident that I haven't missed jack ****.
Click to expand...

Wait...you have "long had me on ignore"...but you seen my posts in the "recent past". Yeah...I'm sure that makes some kind of sense in your mind.

LOL!!
 
Bucky said:
Unfortunate but the new agreement will include a $30 billion, yes billion for u.s agricultural purchases.
Click to expand...

Unfortunate in that your man Trump's tarrifs are costing Americans billions. I have two relatives who farm and are losing their butts because of Trump's tarrifs. That is a good thing because ...
 
Risky Thicket said:
Unfortunate in that your man Trump's tarrifs are costing Americans billions. I have two relatives who farm and are losing their butts because of Trump's tarrifs. That is a good thing because ...
Click to expand...

They weren't doing that great before the tariffs. I know many dairy farmers in Wisconsin that were committing suicide due to Canada's monopoly.
 
Risky Thicket said:
Bucky, tell us about the 7.5 billion dollars Trump has spent to offset the massive losses experienced by farmers due to Trump's tariffs.
Click to expand...

Risky, tell us about the HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS lost due to trade deals unfair to the US...for DECADES.


About time we had a POTUS with the BALLS and international business experience to CONFRONT IT....and NOW IS THE PERFECT TIME, when the US economy is booming....
 
Grokmaster said:
Risky, tell us about the HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS lost due to trade deals unfair to the US...for DECADES.


About time we had a POTUS with the BALLS and international business experience to CONFRONT IT....and NOW IS THE PERFECT TIME, when the US economy is booming....
Click to expand...

If your product cost 1M to produce, and you wanted to sell it for 5M, but only got 3M for it, you know that you didn't lose 2M, right?

Could there have been hundreds of billions extra in the economy? Sure. That, however, does not mean that those companies didn't make the profits they did, now does it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom