- Joined
- Dec 8, 2024
- Messages
- 2,858
- Reaction score
- 2,951
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Yep I knew but they didn'tFor the last two months.
Yep I knew but they didn'tFor the last two months.
Not being charged doesn't mean it wasn't attemptedNeither was J6. No one, not even Trump was charged with insurrection as a result of J6
Sad to say about other Americans, many in MAGA simply refuse to accept facts that don't fit their preferred narratives.Yep I knew but they didn't
You can shut your eyes and mind all you want. It doesn’t change the facts.This picture has no value. You can't tell where or when it was taken!
Trump did follow the law and the Constitution. What would you have him do? Should he let the rioters burn LA down?No, he doesn't. He must follow the law. Trump is breaking the law. Hegseth was asked to explain this, and he ducked the question.
Do you support the Constitution or one man?
You can shut your eyes and mind all you want. It doesn’t change the facts.
During the January 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol, numerous police officers, including those from the U.S. Capitol Police and the Metropolitan Police Department, were injured. At least 174 police officers were injured that day. Some officers sustained serious injuries, including traumatic brain injuries, broken bones, and even the loss of fingers or eyes. Many officers continue to experience long-term health issues and disabilities as a result of the attack. Some officers have even sought protective orders against rioters due to the violence they experienced that day.
MAGA doesn't want to know inconvenient facts. So.....they don't accept them. They reject them. They close their minds to them.So you don’t know much about that day do you?
That picture is actually well known.
Here you go, here’s a little info about Officer Hodges.
View attachment 67574218
He did not. The law cited requires a foreign invasion, a rebellion or the president unable to execute law.Trump did follow the law and the Constitution.
Stay out of state business.What would you have him do?
The president doesn't have the power to police city and state jurisdictions.Should he let the rioters burn LA down?
Clear, succinct, and to the point.He did not. The law cited requires a foreign invasion, a rebellion or the president unable to execute law.
This was a protest with minor looting and property damage. The law doesn't allow execution for tiny riots.
Stay out of state business.
The president doesn't have the power to police city and state jurisdictions.
You have it all wrong. It's your job to prove that ICE wasn't just doing their job.They only grabbed dangerous people?
Proof?
Post #310You have it all wrong. It's your job to prove that ICE wasn't just doing their job.
You compare the ending of WWII with Trump's birthday?The left wing accusation is that Trump is the only President to attend a military parade.
It is another left wing lie .
LA wasn't burning down, and the governor didn't request NG aid.Trump did follow the law and the Constitution. What would you have him do? Should he let the rioters burn LA down?
I have seen videos from both J6 and LA from the last few nights. There were no one assaulted on J6 except Ashli Babbitt. She was no threat to anyone but was killed. Her family will receive nearly $5 Million in government settlement. No fires were set in the Capitol. It is quite different this week in LA!
PROOF?Post #310
Not really.
We know ICE grabbed, detained, and renditioned people who aren't criminals, which shows that ICE failed to limit its actions to "dangerous people" only.
The term is cognitive dissonance.MAGA doesn't want to know inconvenient facts. So.....they don't accept them. They reject them. They close their minds to them.
It's their way of protecting and preserving the narrative they want to be true.
Notice the topic and Trumps words?Notice the word "peaceably."
Post #310
Not really.
We know ICE grabbed, detained, and renditioned people who aren't criminals, which shows that ICE failed to limit its actions to "dangerous people" only.
Post #315PROOF?
Correct. There were no riots, in spite of what Fox puts on the banner. Nobody was killed and only a few driverless cars were set on fire. These were basically peaceful protests with the only violence coming from L.E.LA wasn't burning down, and the governor didn't request NG aid.
Trump did follow the law and the Constitution. What would you have him do? Should he let the rioters burn LA down?
LAPD police chief stated that things were out of control.
Uh huh. But LA wasn't burning down, so there's that. If you want to stick with reality.LAPD police chief stated that things were out of control.
There were pockets of rioting and setting things ablaze. Those responsible should be arrested. But this whole chicken little things MAGA is trying to play, like it's the ****ing '92 riots is just hysterics.Correct. There were no riots, in spite of what Fox puts on the banner. Nobody was killed and only a few driverless cars were set on fire. These were basically peaceful protests with the only violence coming from L.E.
PROOF?
Yes J6 was an insurrection and it was done to stop the certification process to keep Trump as president since he was telling his cult the election was stolen from him over and over again.Neither was J6. No one, not even Trump was charged with insurrection as a result of J6