Trump Wants $58 Million To Boost Security For Executive And Judicial Branches

[ColdHardTruth]

Trump Wants $58 Million To Boost Security For Executive And Judicial Branches​

The Trump administration will ask Congress for $58 million in security funding for the executive and judicial branches following the Sept. 10 assassination of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University.

The supplemental funding request directs resources to the U.S. Marshals Service and includes enhanced protection for Supreme Court justices, a White House official said. The administration also supports increased funding for congressional security but will defer to the legislative branch on specifics, CBS News reported.

This needs to be denied.

MSN

 

[Hamish Howl]

Naw.

 

[iliveonramen]

They'll just leave the rest of us to get shot up with all the guns they've allowed to flood the streets by all the 20 something's their rhetoric has radicalized.

Violence for thee, not me.

 

[Pyrite]

Trump Wants $58 Million To Boost Security For Executive And Judicial Branches​

The Trump administration will ask Congress for $58 million in security funding for the executive and judicial branches following the Sept. 10 assassination of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University.

The supplemental funding request directs resources to the U.S. Marshals Service and includes enhanced protection for Supreme Court justices, a White House official said. The administration also supports increased funding for congressional security but will defer to the legislative branch on specifics, CBS News reported.

This needs to be denied.

MSN

Why should we authorize this?

Remember, trump is the guy who has terminated security teams for so many others.

Trump has set the example: "We don't need no stinkin' security".

 

[Ikari]

Maybe when prices start going down.

 

[Integrityrespec]

Trump Wants $58 Million To Boost Security For Executive And Judicial Branches​

The Trump administration will ask Congress for $58 million in security funding for the executive and judicial branches following the Sept. 10 assassination of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University.

The supplemental funding request directs resources to the U.S. Marshals Service and includes enhanced protection for Supreme Court justices, a White House official said. The administration also supports increased funding for congressional security but will defer to the legislative branch on specifics, CBS News reported.

This needs to be denied.

MSN

Why would we deny this? We are seeing more politically motivated violence. We saw an attempt to kidnap and kill an SCOTUS judge a few years ago, why would we not protect them?

 

[PeacefulWarrior]

Why would we deny this? We are seeing more politically motivated violence. We saw an attempt to kidnap and kill an SCOTUS judge a few years ago, why would we not protect them?

Meh.

All the armed citizens should be all the "protection" anyone needs.

When everyone has a gun it makes it so nothing bad can happen. I see no cause at all for concern.

 

[Pyrite]

Why would we deny this? We are seeing more politically motivated violence. We saw an attempt to kidnap and kill an SCOTUS judge a few years ago, why would we not protect them?

Despite your seeing "more politically motivated violence", trump has terminated the security details of many Americans.

If trump has decided these public individuals are safe enough without protection, then it seems conditions for executive and judicial personnel are similar.

 

[Gatsby]

Trump Wants $58 Million To Boost Security For Executive And Judicial Branches​

The Trump administration will ask Congress for $58 million in security funding for the executive and judicial branches following the Sept. 10 assassination of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University.

The supplemental funding request directs resources to the U.S. Marshals Service and includes enhanced protection for Supreme Court justices, a White House official said. The administration also supports increased funding for congressional security but will defer to the legislative branch on specifics, CBS News reported.

That seems prudent, in light of the events of this week.

This needs to be denied.

Why?

Despite your seeing "more politically motivated violence", trump has terminated the security details of many Americans.

If trump has decided these public individuals are safe enough without protection, then it seems conditions for executive and judicial personnel are similar.

He should give Kamala Harris back her Secret Service protection, if she wants it. Especially after what has happened this week.

 

[ColdHardTruth]

Why would we deny this? We are seeing more politically motivated violence. We saw an attempt to kidnap and kill an SCOTUS judge a few years ago, why would we not protect them?

It needs to be denied because Trump and his GQP stooges created these problems. They do not need to spend our money to hide from us.

 

[Lursa]

Trump Wants $58 Million To Boost Security For Executive And Judicial Branches​

The Trump administration will ask Congress for $58 million in security funding for the executive and judicial branches following the Sept. 10 assassination of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University.

The supplemental funding request directs resources to the U.S. Marshals Service and includes enhanced protection for Supreme Court justices, a White House official said. The administration also supports increased funding for congressional security but will defer to the legislative branch on specifics, CBS News reported.

This needs to be denied.

MSN

I bet Congress will vote for that!

 

[Lursa]

Why should we authorize this?

Remember, trump is the guy who has terminated security teams for so many others.

Trump has set the example: "We don't need no stinkin' security".

I dont think TACO could make it more plain that Congress has little power and will be getting less. As long as TACO and the federal benches are protected...he'll just keep going around them

 

[ColdHardTruth]

That seems prudent, in light of the events of this week.

He doesn't deserve security at the expense of the American people. The judges who enable his criminal behavior do not deserve security either. They must live with the beast they created.

Why?

He should give Kamala Harris back her Secret Service protection, if she wants it. Especially after what has happened this week.

He will not and this is just one of many reasons he deserves no security and why nobody who works for him deserves any security. That money needs to be returned to the American people he stole it from.

 

[Gatsby]

He doesn't deserve security at the expense of the American people. The judges who enable his criminal behavior do not deserve security either. They must live with the beast they created.

I think executive officials and federal judges do deserve security at the expense of the American people, actually.

 

[Loulit01]

Small government republicans.