- Joined
- Sep 30, 2019
- Messages
- 53,936
- Reaction score
- 81,610
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
These costs you represent are flawed in two ways. First of, it is generation capacity. Coal, gas, etc. can sustain that 24/7/365. Solar only has less than 1/4 the rated capacity as an annual average. Wind, is up in the air. Chaotic and unpredictable.
No one is saying that wind and solar are a solution that can replace all other sources. It compliments energy generation sources that can fill the gap when wind or solar aren't providing enough electricity.
The second flaw is those numbers are reduced for solar and wind with the tax credits they get that other power doesn't.
How do you know that?