- Joined
- Jan 21, 2013
- Messages
- 25,357
- Reaction score
- 11,557
- Location
- Post-Trump America
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
“You gotta take care of the floors. You know the floors of the forest, very important,” he said before mentioning a conversation with Finnish president Sauli Niinistö. “They spent a lot of time on raking and cleaning and doing things and they don’t have any problem.”
He’s still your president.
He’s still your president.
He’s still your president.
He’s still your president.
The federal government controls 46 percent of California’s land, much of it managed by the U.S. Forest Service. In the three decades before 1990, foresters harvested 10-12 billion board feet of timber from national forests every year. By 2013, restrictive environmental policies cut that to 2.5 billion. While the harvest declined, so too did tree thinning and the clearing of brush and diseased trees. The Trump administration is reversing that trend with the biggest harvest of trees on federal land in 20 years, selling 3.4 billion board feet on some 3 million acres—still just a third of the typical pre-1990 harvest.
Harvesting trees on public land is controversial but helps pay for needed brush clearing. Many environmental groups vigorously oppose both. But fighting the larger, hotter fires that result without active forest management is even more costly and threatens lives.
In California, tighter environmental controls, higher prices for timber harvesting permits and competition from overseas and pine forests in American Southeast led to a collapse of the state's timber industry. Employment in the industry in 2017 was half of what it was in the 1990s.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chuckd...ve-been-mitigated-by-prevention/#5533408341ba
'needed brush clearing'
If harvesting 10-12 billion board feet of timber from national forests every year would make massive fires like what we've seen, growing larger each year it also seems, I'm prepared to harvest those 10-12 billion board feet of timber.
I wonder if the environmentalists eco-Nazis are going to allow this common sense measure, or not. More likely not.
Welp. Cali. I guess you'll just have to learn to live with these fires, if you prevent the clearing of the brush fuel that feeds them. But at least the ecomentalists will be happy.
So wait? Conservatives are now for environmental policies and pre-existing conditions? Is illegal immigration and abortion next??? Give me a break. This trump worship crap is ridiculous.
He’s still your president.
No, if anything, I'm poking fun at how stupid the ecomentalists are, and how they contributed to the increasing fire threat and damage.
If this is just going to be yet another bash Trump with poor logic, I'm just going to bail. Far too much of it already in this forum.
No, if anything, I'm poking fun at how stupid the ecomentalists and absolutist policies are, and how they both contributed to the increasing fire threat and increasing fire damage.
If this is just going to be yet another bash Trump with thinly disguised poor logic, I'm just going to bail. Far too much of it already in this forum.
So you are self-identifying as an illegal alien?No actually he isn't - he really only claims to care about certain people. I am not one of those.
So if he doesn't cave to crazy lefty pseudo-environmentalists, then he has no credibility.But Climate Change in an environment where we have had twenty-six 500 year storms over ten years is just not a factor. Please....until Trump knuckles under on Climate Change he has no credibility in any discussion of forest management.
Dumbest. President. Ever. I mean at least in his smaller press conferences he could speak. Now it's just baseless rambling.
The above quote was completely made up by the President of the United States. Nothing in that statement is true.
Trump suggests proper raking might have spared California from its wildfires
No actually he isn't - he really only claims to care about certain people. I am not one of those.
trump is NOT my president. He is a Russian puppet. Putin is running the USA right now.
Who are these environmentalists against forest management. I've been an environmentalist over 20 years, lots of school, and I never met one.
Dumbest. President. Ever. I mean at least in his smaller press conferences he could speak. Now it's just baseless rambling.
The above quote was completely made up by the President of the United States. Nothing in that statement is true.
Trump suggests proper raking might have spared California from its wildfires
Anyone who doesn't support indiscriminate logging is against forest management.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?