• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump signs executive order directing federal funding cuts to PBS and NPR (1 Viewer)

They found no waste. Zero.
THEY decided 200 billion was not what Trump wanted. It was not waste. They claimed they would find 2 trillion in waste and theft.

Like eventing Trump it was a big fail.
Ah another defender of the bureaucratic state who doesnt believe a penny the federal government spends is wasteful.
 
'Traitor Trump' Is that 'dumbass snark' from you or just you trying to be 'clever?'

Lol. So you are now imitating Trump. You libs have become what you hate.
It's something he heard in 2nd grade. He seems to be really proud of the juvenile insults.
 
To take power, an authoritarian regime needs an ignorant public.

And that's why the authoritarians have been backing NPR and PBS, to have them create one-sided pictures of everything, in service of partisan goals.
Monies approved by the US Congress must not go to partisan causes.
 
If Trump was actually serious about saving government money he'd stay at The White House and only take the bare minimum of Trips.
He should also stop his tendency to stand next to a helicopter waiting to go while he moans about some absolute bollocks.

He's the king of wasting public funds.
Maybe he can have Tesla make him an electric helicopter. Oh but then you'd complain about corruption.
 
And that's why the authoritarians have been backing NPR and PBS, to have them create one-sided pictures of everything, in service of partisan goals.
Monies approved by the US Congress must not go to partisan causes.
NPR and PBS as machines for authoritarian propaganda is some funny shit. God damn you people are soft in the most hilarious of ways. :LOL:
 


I hate this mother****er, the GOP and their voters.

Project 2025 scumbag shit.

Let’s defund a very educational broadcast.

It’s clear they want a stupid and uneducated populace they can manipulate inconsistent support.
What did Trump say? "I love the poorly educated!" And why is that? Because they're both stupid enough to believe what he tells them, and dumb enough to vote for him, without question.
 
NPR and PBS only look left wing when you are far right.

Anything the far-right and Trump voters find hard to understand, is Communism.
 
State run media that leans towards a particular political party?

Not only should we defund it, we should put the leadership for PBS and NPR in prison for defrauding taxpayers.


your average democrat doesn't understand the difference because they don't work, meaning they don't pay taxes.
What evidence do you have of PBS' alleged political lean? Evidence of fraud? Your average conservatives are too stupid to understand PBS programming, so they have to attack it.
 
The government should not be funding far left propaganda.
Agreed.
In specific support of this assertion:

PBS NewsHour:
  • Criticism: Rated "Lean Left" by AllSides (bias meter: -1.10), critics argue NewsHour’s story selection favors progressive issues, such as LGBTQ rights, critical race theory, or climate change, over conservative priorities. A 2023 study cited by the White House claimed 85% negative coverage of congressional Republicans vs. 54% positive coverage of Democrats. Specific stories flagged include coverage of Florida’s school policies on LGBTQ students or Michigan’s Arabic ballots, seen as appealing to liberal audiences.

  • Example: Rep. Greene accused NewsHour of “actively using taxpayer funds to push radical left positions” during a March 2025 House hearing, though she provided no specific NewsHour segment.
Let’s Learn:
  • Criticism: Rep. Greene claimed in March 2025 that PBS’s children’s show Let’s Learn featured a drag queen, targeting ages 3–8 and promoting “radical left” gender ideology. This was cited as evidence of PBS using taxpayer funds for progressive propaganda.

  • Example: The accusation stemmed from a drag queen segment mistakenly posted on a New York City PBS station’s website, not broadcast on Let’s Learn. Kerger clarified it was never aired and was promptly removed.
In the case of drag queen segment mistakenly posted on a New York City PBS station’s website which was removed, had there been no push back, do you even think for a second that it wouldn't have been removed?

Washington Week:
  • Criticism: A 2023 White House study alleged Washington Week covered up Joe Biden’s mental decline, with journalist Jeff Goldberg claiming Biden was “quite acute,” seen as protecting liberal figures. Critics argue this reflects a broader PBS pattern of shielding Democrats.

Morning Edition and All Things Considered:
  • Criticism: These flagship programs are accused of liberal bias, particularly post-2016, for allegedly aiming to “damage or topple Trump’s presidency” (Uri Berliner, 2024 essay). Berliner, a former NPR editor, claimed coverage of Trump-Russia collusion was overzealous, while the Hunter Biden laptop story was ignored due to progressive bias. A 2024 study cited by the White House noted NPR used “far-right” 162 times vs. “far-left” six times, suggesting skewed framing.
 
(continued)

Cultural and Feature Stories:
  • Criticism: NPR has been mocked for stories perceived as progressive excesses, such as:
    • 2021: Reports on “healthism” as “latent fatphobia” and animals deserving pronouns, criticized as fringe identity politics.

    • 2022: Features on “trans-ceratops” dinosaur enthusiasts and “Queer Ducks” teaching teens about animal sexuality, seen as pushing gender ideology.

    • 2016: Soft coverage of Fidel Castro’s death, avoiding “dictator” and framing him as a revolutionary, accused of glorifying communism.
Other Historical Examples:
  • 1994 Mumia Abu-Jamal Commentary: NPR planned to air commentaries by convicted murderer Mumia Abu-Jamal on All Things Considered, canceled after backlash from Congress and the Fraternal Order of Police. Critics saw this as sympathizing with radical left causes.

  • 2010 Juan Williams Firing: NPR terminated Williams for comments on Fox News, claiming he violated ethics by not being a “predictable, black liberal,” fueling perceptions of ideological conformity.

  • Analysis: The Abu-Jamal incident was a misstep reflecting liberal openness to controversial voices, not “far left” advocacy. Williams’ firing suggests intolerance for conservative views, but it’s not evidence of radical ideology.

Do it with your own money.
Agreed.
 
Agreed.
In specific support of this assertion:

PBS NewsHour:
  • Criticism: Rated "Lean Left" by AllSides (bias meter: -1.10), critics argue NewsHour’s story selection favors progressive issues, such as LGBTQ rights, critical race theory, or climate change, over conservative priorities. A 2023 study cited by the White House claimed 85% negative coverage of congressional Republicans vs. 54% positive coverage of Democrats. Specific stories flagged include coverage of Florida’s school policies on LGBTQ students or Michigan’s Arabic ballots, seen as appealing to liberal audiences.

  • Example: Rep. Greene accused NewsHour of “actively using taxpayer funds to push radical left positions” during a March 2025 House hearing, though she provided no specific NewsHour segment.
Let’s Learn:
  • Criticism: Rep. Greene claimed in March 2025 that PBS’s children’s show Let’s Learn featured a drag queen, targeting ages 3–8 and promoting “radical left” gender ideology. This was cited as evidence of PBS using taxpayer funds for progressive propaganda.

  • Example: The accusation stemmed from a drag queen segment mistakenly posted on a New York City PBS station’s website, not broadcast on Let’s Learn. Kerger clarified it was never aired and was promptly removed.
In the case of drag queen segment mistakenly posted on a New York City PBS station’s website which was removed, had there been no push back, do you even think for a second that it wouldn't have been removed?

Washington Week:
  • Criticism: A 2023 White House study alleged Washington Week covered up Joe Biden’s mental decline, with journalist Jeff Goldberg claiming Biden was “quite acute,” seen as protecting liberal figures. Critics argue this reflects a broader PBS pattern of shielding Democrats.

Morning Edition and All Things Considered:
  • Criticism: These flagship programs are accused of liberal bias, particularly post-2016, for allegedly aiming to “damage or topple Trump’s presidency” (Uri Berliner, 2024 essay). Berliner, a former NPR editor, claimed coverage of Trump-Russia collusion was overzealous, while the Hunter Biden laptop story was ignored due to progressive bias. A 2024 study cited by the White House noted NPR used “far-right” 162 times vs. “far-left” six times, suggesting skewed framing.
And of course none of the above criticisms could be aimed at right-wing media. Correct? So why the faux outrage?
 
And of course none of the above criticisms could be aimed at right-wing media. Correct? So why the faux outrage?
Diversion. This topic is about NPR & PBS and their public funding.

Further, 'right-wing media' isn't collecting public money, and generally isn't being pitched at kids, such as much of PBS is.

Your attempted diversion is denied.
 
Maybe he can have Tesla make him an electric helicopter. Oh but then you'd complain about corruption.

If the procurement competition was open to all helicopter manufacturers and Tesla won in a fair bidding competition I'd have zero problem with that.
 
(continued)

Cultural and Feature Stories:
  • Criticism: NPR has been mocked for stories perceived as progressive excesses, such as:
    • 2021: Reports on “healthism” as “latent fatphobia” and animals deserving pronouns, criticized as fringe identity politics.

    • 2022: Features on “trans-ceratops” dinosaur enthusiasts and “Queer Ducks” teaching teens about animal sexuality, seen as pushing gender ideology.

    • 2016: Soft coverage of Fidel Castro’s death, avoiding “dictator” and framing him as a revolutionary, accused of glorifying communism.
Other Historical Examples:
  • 1994 Mumia Abu-Jamal Commentary: NPR planned to air commentaries by convicted murderer Mumia Abu-Jamal on All Things Considered, canceled after backlash from Congress and the Fraternal Order of Police. Critics saw this as sympathizing with radical left causes.

  • 2010 Juan Williams Firing: NPR terminated Williams for comments on Fox News, claiming he violated ethics by not being a “predictable, black liberal,” fueling perceptions of ideological conformity.

  • Analysis: The Abu-Jamal incident was a misstep reflecting liberal openness to controversial voices, not “far left” advocacy. Williams’ firing suggests intolerance for conservative views, but it’s not evidence of radical ideology.


Agreed.
Marjorie Taylor Greene is complaining that reality based news is left leaning?

I am shocked.

Maybe they should do an expose on how Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster stole the 2020 election from Trump.
 
PBS and NPR? Too expensive, cut them!

Trump golfing? Totally acceptable.

Gp8046XXQAAMikw
 
Marjorie Taylor Greene is complaining that reality based news is left leaning?
Fake news is left blue fake news.
I am shocked.
I am however not shocked that people think fake news is reality. It's called indoctrination and it's been happening since the beginning of Man kind
Maybe they should do an expose on how Bigfoot and the Loch Ness Monster stole the 2020 election from Trump.
Just ignoring the 18 million people that popped into existence to vote for Joe Biden and then disappeared in 2024 would probably get even people like you to realize that they are fake news.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom