• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump says US struck another Venezuelan drug vessel, killing three

So you don't think the President of the United States should have to answer to the people of the United States?
Sure he does. But he doesn't have to answer to YOU, specifially.
 
You’ve made it quite clear Trump is your deity, yes.

Unfortunately for you, that can’t change the facts.
yawn...

Boring.

Now you are going to attack me. You lose.

Bye.
 
yawn...

Boring.

Now you are going to attack me. You lose.

Bye.
You literally haven’t made an argument. You’ve squealed a bunch wailing about how horrified you are that anyone would dare criticize your Fuhrer and never given any sort of reason to believe a word he says.

Pretty comical.
 
Oh...so you are just making shit up.

Okay.

Um....no. I wasn't "making shit up".

I was asking if it meant Trump could use drone strikes on ANTIFA rallies in American cities.

*sigh*
Re-read it again.
 
more then enough for a signature strike. If you rule out other uses for the go fasts - like fisherman or pleasure boating
PLUS look at the existing pattern, thats plenty of criteria to drone terrorists
You can’t.

🤷‍♀️
 
Boat with empty containers and three dummies.
 
I always get a kick out of it when MAGAs try too hard.

MAGAs so desperate to do the impossible which is salvage Their Hero the Generalissimo from yet another mess he's got Him Self into.

This failed post can be called invoking the Senate career-ender of Joni Ernst "We're all going to die."
Joni Ernst is right. It's an absolute fact. Is that shocking to you?
We're all going to die including drug smugglers trying to enter our country.
So you don't believe a word that anyone from the DOD says.
And
You don't believe we're getting the whole story on the boat strikes.
But
You aren't going to worry about it?

Words fail me.
If your words are failing you then try harder to frame them.
Just like anyone else with a working mind, I sometimes feel not enough information is coming out of the DOD to make me feel comfortable.
You made the fatuous assumption I "don't believe a word that anyone from the DOD says." In that case of the boats blotted out on the sea, I do not.
 
Nice way to sidestep the killing of American citizens by a president.
I didn’t side step anything. I corrected you. You tried to hilariously claim he assassinated US citizens. That is hilariously retarded and demonstrably false.
Are you stating the war in Afghanistan was a 'declared' war?
😂
What makes Obama's decision to target Americans any less egregious than Trump's decision to take out alleged Venezuelan drug smugglers?
Asked and answered. Enemy combatants in a declared war in an actual war zone vs random people on a small boat in international waters.
 
Joni Ernst is right. It's an absolute fact. Is that shocking to you?
We're all going to die including drug smugglers trying to enter our country.
Indeed, your current approach to posting is to try too hard. Trying too hard was the ultimate downfall of Ernst's Senate career that has become dead on its feet. And the Generalissimo is the bloodthirsty president who is counting the exploded dead in the Caribbean.
 
You can’t.

🤷‍♀️
Its been done starting with Shrub. Obama turned it up because of John Brennan's "Kill list".
I'm quoting anti-terrorist protocol since the various gangs and cartels have been designated as Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO)
Miller and the rest of the hawks are on well worn path. They are just too arrogant to express why they are going to war
 
Last edited:
Um....no. I wasn't "making shit up".

I was asking if it meant Trump could use drone strikes on ANTIFA rallies in American cities.

*sigh*
Re-read it again.
Domestic soil: The government's position, supported by the Constitution, is that lethal force cannot be used against a citizen on American soil outside of traditional law enforcement or combat scenarios, even in cases of domestic terrorism. The law and Constitution apply in the same way, regardless of the technology used.
 
Well, then, instead of being all cryptic here, why don’t you just spit it out- what U.S. citizens did Obama target with drones?
You can do internet research as well as I.
Read the article I found for you.

Says President Barack Obama was responsible for "the assassination of at least four American citizens" in drone strikes.

 
You can do internet research as well as I.
Read the article I found for you.

Says President Barack Obama was responsible for "the assassination of at least four American citizens" in drone strikes.

Flailing post that isn’t supporting what you posted. Now you’re moving the goalposts to Obama being “responsible” when your initial comment was Obama “targeted” U.S. citizens. Do you pay attention to what you actually post, or are you too busy shoveling your partisan dirt?

Since a reminder is apparently needed, here’s your post with me bolding the words:
"Because people are being killed."

People are being killed all over the world. Do you worry about them at all?
Or is it just when the Trump Administration is involved?

Obama targeted U.S. citizens with drones years ago. Were you interested in those questionable air strikes then?
I already knew this post was wrong. Unlike you, I didn’t have to research it. That’s why I only brought up Anwar al-Awlaki.
 
Last edited:
Flailing post that isn’t supporting what you posted. Now you’re moving the goalposts to Obama being “responsible” when your initial comment was Obama “targeted” U.S. citizens. Do you pay attention to what you actually post, or are you too busy shoveling your partisan dirt?

Since a reminder is apparently needed, here’s your post with me bolding the words:

I already knew this post was wrong. Unlike you, I didn’t have to research it. That’s why I only brought up Anwar al-Awlaki.
Did he or did he not target U.S. citizens with a drone?

Are you reacting to the word "target" or just an unfortunate accident?
 
How long ago were the 1880's?
Les than two hundred years ago. How many hundreds in one hundred?

Do you know what the current year is?
I do. I am trying to understand how you think about 145 years ago is "hundreds". Let's try a more practical example. If you have $145 in your wallet and someone asks you to state generally how much is on you, would you say "hundreds of dollars"?
:)
 
Did he or did he not target U.S. citizens with a drone?

Are you reacting to the word "target" or just an unfortunate accident?
Why are you making posts here with links, then asking me? The answer is in the link you posted, trying to boost your stance pointing at what Obama did, when it actually proved otherwise.

“The acknowledgement came in a letter signed by U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder sent that day to the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman:

Since 2009, the United States, in the conduct of U.S. counterterrorism operations against al-Qa’ida and its associated forces outside of areas of active hostilities, has specifically targeted and killed one U.S. citizen, Anwar al-Aulaqi. The United States is further aware of three other U.S. citizens who have been killed in such U.S. counterterrorism operations over that same time period: Samir Khan, ‘Abd al-Rahman Anwar al-Aulaqi, and Jude Kenan Mohammed. These individuals were not specifically targeted by the United States.


And there is a distinct difference between targeting someone, and someone being in harm’s way, being collateral in a place they shouldn’t be in the first place.
 
Why are you making posts here with links, then asking me? The answer is in the link you posted, trying to boost your stance pointing at what Obama did, when it actually proved otherwise.

“The acknowledgement came in a letter signed by U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder sent that day to the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman:

Since 2009, the United States, in the conduct of U.S. counterterrorism operations against al-Qa’ida and its associated forces outside of areas of active hostilities, has specifically targeted and killed one U.S. citizen, Anwar al-Aulaqi. The United States is further aware of three other U.S. citizens who have been killed in such U.S. counterterrorism operations over that same time period: Samir Khan, ‘Abd al-Rahman Anwar al-Aulaqi, and Jude Kenan Mohammed. These individuals were not specifically targeted by the United States.


And there is a distinct difference between targeting someone, and someone being in harm’s way, being collateral in a place they shouldn’t be in the first place.
Okay.
Obama and his executioners made the blunder of killing three innocent U.S. citizens while successfully target a know terrorist Aulaqi.
It's tough being in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Like Palestinian citizens hiding in schools or hospitals while Hamas fighters are using the same structures to attack IDF forces. Collateral damage.
 
Okay.
Obama and his executioners made the blunder of killing three innocent U.S. citizens while successfully target a know terrorist Aulaqi.
It's tough being in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Not sure just how innocent those three were. What were they doing there?

There were/are a few places in the world people should probably stay away from while being a U.S. citizen for all kinds of reasons. Like Yemen, Pakistan, Iran, China, North Korea, etc. You know, personal responsibility and all.
 
Back
Top Bottom