• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump refuses to return an immigrant he illegally deported to El Salvador

Actually, blaming Biden will not be tolerated.
These people are more the exception than the rule.
You should turn off the Faux.
Not all immigrants are good people; however, not all of them are bad either.

you said - and I quote "There is no evidence any of this happened."

so you understand and admit illegals are murdering US citizens, raping, human trafficking and child porn

good - you're opening your eyes and waking up and, more honorably, you're admitting you were wrong

I appreciate that
 




murder
rape
human trafficking
child porn


all illegal immigrants that Biden allowed to be in the USA - if you'd look anywhere but lying-liberal news, you'd see
So, should someone reply with examples of crimes by illegals who entered under Trump? Or perhaps with stats that show that all immigrants have lower crime rates than citizens?
 
So, should someone reply with examples of crimes by illegals who entered under Trump? Or perhaps with stats that show that all immigrants have lower crime rates than citizens?

yes, do that too, because Trump failed to secure border in his first term

its totally irrelevant "lower crime rate" ......... 100% of crimes committed by illegally here people are 100% preventable by them NOT being here illegally

deport every illegally here person and they'd be ZERO here to commit crimes
 
yes, do that too, because Trump failed to secure border in his first term

its totally irrelevant "lower crime rate" ......... 100% of crimes committed by illegally here people are 100% preventable by them NOT being here illegally

deport every illegally here person and they'd be ZERO here to commit crimes
Would crime still exist in the US if every illegal was deported?
 
yes, do that too, because Trump failed to secure border in his first term

its totally irrelevant "lower crime rate" ......... 100% of crimes committed by illegally here people are 100% preventable by them NOT being here illegally

deport every illegally here person and they'd be ZERO here to commit crimes
Deport every legally here person and there would be zero here to commit crimes.
 
First Trump illegally deports immigrants to El Salvador, falsely claiming they had criminal records, under a provision that "...requires a president to declare the United States is at war"
(Just like another declared war that doesn't exist, allowing him to impose his tariff tax).

Then he lies about the illegal deportations to El Salvador;


After a judge rules that his act was, "wholly lawless", Trump defends his legal act of deporting a Maryland man, a legal resident with no criminal record. Next he admits his error:


Then he claims the judge cannot order him to return the man, asking the SCOTUS to block the judge's court order which they're stayed to have time to review the case.
Next, he suspends his top Immigration Lawyer for his honesty in admitting Trump's "error".

Now to top it all off, he has the gall to claim that if the SCOTUS demands his return, he "...can't force return of the man mistakenly deported", which he is actually just refuses to.
If a white American was being illegally held by any country (besides Russia), he would demand his return and work to make it happen.
Trump is governing a lawless manner akin to any other authorian autocrat. America is as far from 'great' as it's ever been...

He came here illegally from El Salvador. Now he has been returned to where he belongs.
 
Would crime still exist in the US if every illegal was deported?

illegally here committing crimes would be Zero that's correct

and we should have 0 illegally here people, its against the law to be here illegally
 
He came here illegally from El Salvador. Now he has been returned to where he belongs.
Illegally. Do laws matter anymore. A federal judge issued and order preventing his deportation to El Salvador. He was not afforded any hearing or any due process and illegally deported. Due two illegal acts make it legal to you?
 
illegally here committing crimes would be Zero that's correct

and we should have 0 illegally here people, its against the law to be here illegally
sigh. nice try to avoid answering.

The question is if ALL illegals are removed from the US, would crime still happen in the US? Yes or No.
 
Illegally. Do laws matter anymore. A federal judge issued and order preventing his deportation to El Salvador. He was not afforded any hearing or any due process and illegally deported. Due two illegal acts make it legal to you?
Illegals should not have any due process. They came here illegally. They should have never been here in the first place.
 
He came here illegally from El Salvador. Now he has been returned to where he belongs.
Read the facts of the case and the law. Regardless of his manner of entry, he is eligible for protection from return, protection he was apparently granted in the form of “withholding of removal.” For 20 years I worked on cases of thousands of persons who entered illegally, some granted protection, others not. The Refugee Act of 1980 - which I believe is still the controlling legislation - states that anyone at a border, port of entry or present in the US can apply for the protections of asylum or withholding “irrespective of (their immigration) status.” In addition, the Senate-ratified Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees and the also ratified Convention Against Torture would also prohibit its return, given that our own government under Trump reported on torture in El Salvador.

But we are faced with a president who for years has shown little respect for laws, treaties, and decency.
 
Read the facts of the case and the law. Regardless of his manner of entry, he is eligible for protection from return, protection he was apparently granted in the form of “withholding of removal.” For 20 years I worked on cases of thousands of persons who entered illegally, some granted protection, others not. The Refugee Act of 1980 - which I believe is still the controlling legislation - states that anyone at a border, port of entry or present in the US can apply for the protections of asylum or withholding “irrespective of (their immigration) status.” In addition, the Senate-ratified Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees and the also ratified Convention Against Torture would also prohibit its return, given that our own government under Trump reported on torture in El Salvador.

But we are faced with a president who for years has shown little respect for laws, treaties, and decency.
The facts of the case are he came here illegally from El Salvador and now he has been returned home.
 
Illegally. Do laws matter anymore. A federal judge issued and order preventing his deportation to El Salvador. He was not afforded any hearing or any due process and illegally deported. Due two illegal acts make it legal to you?
Of course not, but Trump’s illegal acts are legal in the eyes of some of his supporters. It was Louis XIV who set the tone for their view of The Donald with his comment “l’etat, c’est moi.” Donald’s version: “I have the right to do anything I want as president.”
 
The facts of the case are he came here illegally from El Salvador and now he has been returned home.
The facts of the case are that he was under a court ordered not to be deported to El Salvador.

The Trump admin. Deported him in violation of that order. They admitted they made a mistake. Then the Supreme Court ordered the Trump admin to facilitate his release. TheTrump admin is violating that court order as well.

We are in a constitutional crisis.
 
The facts of the case is that he was under a court ordered not to be deported to El Salvador.

The Trump admin. Deported him in violation of that order. They admitted they made a mistake. Then the Supreme Court ordered the Trump admin to facilitate his release. TheTrump admin is violating that court order as well.

We are in a constitutional crisis.
Trump tried to get him back and the president there refuses to send him back. So, what are you going to do about it? If you guys had actually secured the border from illegals we wouldn't be at this point right now.
 
Trump tried to get him back and the president there refuses to send him back. So, what are you going to do about it? If you guys had actually secured the border from illegals we wouldn't be at this point right now.
“O Lordy, Lordy, what shall ah do,” says the head of the powerless USA (pop. 300 million) a la the mad Blanche Dubois from “Streetcar Named Desire,” or if you prefer, the helpless Butterfly McQueen from “Gone with the Wind” — when confronted with the awesome power of El Salvador (pop. 6+ million) which we are paying to jail a US resident granted protection from removal by the US. True, El Salvador has more people than Greenland, which we could take by force, if necessary, but somehow I think the Art of the Deal guy might be able to figure out something. He could sic Vance on the Salvadoran dictator for not wearing a suit to the meeting.

And get real, Garcia entered the US during the time of Obama, who was scorned by some immigrant advocates as the “deportee-in-chief” for his aggressive actions removing people. And I worked on the border during Trump’s first administration, when Garcia would have been screened in by ICE much as were many others fleeing forcible recruitment by drug gangs.
 
Last edited:
Im sorry have you made a post on the topic yet?
Yes actually. But I'm under no obligation to repost it. I'm gonna waste time over and over again.
 
Trump tried to get him back and the president there refuses to send him back. So, what are you going to do about it? If you guys had actually secured the border from illegals we wouldn't be at this point right now.
See.. figured this would be the excuse. Now you will say he didn't ignore the court order.
Which he did.
 
“O Lordy, Lordy, what shall ah do,” says the head of the powerless USA — a la the mad Blanche Dubois from “Streetcar Named Desire,” or if you prefer Butterfly McQueen from “Gone with the Wind” — when confronted with the awesome power of El Salvador, whom we are paying to jail a US resident granted protection from removal by the US. True, El Salvador has more people than Greenland, which we could take by force, if necessary
I missed it in your post. What are you going to do? Or are you still going to evade the question?
 
See.. figured this would be the excuse. Now you will say he didn't ignore the court order.
Which he did.
He's trying to rectify the mistake but that big old bad president of El Salvador refuses to return the mistake we made. So, what are you going to do about it?
 
Illegals should not have any due process. They came here illegally. They should have never been here in the first place.
So the law and Constitution should just be thrown away. You cannot make arbitrary ad hoc law just to please yourself. That shows the logic of the school of imatwoyearold.
 
I missed it in your post. What are you going to do? Or are you still going to evade the question?
I will do nothing other than protest Trump’s inaction. But it seems to me that if the US is providing money and prisoners to El Salvador, if Trump is threatening to take back the Canal from Panama, to take Greenland, he can figure out a way to do the right thing in this case, however against character doing the right thing is for him.

Why are you evading facing the facts of the case and the reality of US power to easily resolve their admitted error? Oh, I forgot: 1-Trump doesn’t make mistakes; 2- as he said, Trump could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and not lose some of his supporters.

But what question am I evading?
 
Back
Top Bottom