• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump pledged to be a ‘peacemaker’ in the Middle East — now the United States is entering a new war

Phys251

Purge evil with Justice
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 24, 2011
Messages
69,801
Reaction score
69,610
Location
USA
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Liberal
They used to tell us history would judge Bush kindly for Iraq two decades on and we allsee it for the cluster**** it was (as if we didn't then).

Same with Trump and this. Going overseas and picking foreign military adventures rarely ends well these days.

More so because like Netanyahu, convicted felon Donald Trump may use perpetual conflict to solidify his power at home beyond the limits of the constitution.
 
You end wars by showing strength. You start wars by showing weakness.
 

lol, wouldn’t have you down as a John McCain fan.

Anyway, good to see the last decade of Republicans pretending to be anti-war has been categorically proved to be the horseshit it obviously was.
 
From the center-right CNBC:


In one fell swoop, tRump has not only broken his promise to be a peacemaker in the Middle East; he may have helped start another war there.
And once upon a time we fought a war with Germany, Italy, and Japan. We dropped two devastating bombs on Japan and what has been the result? All three are now allies and Japan with the help of the U.S. is a democratic state, and ally and a great trade partner. Prior to the war is was a form of Constitutional Monarchy with power shifting to the military and the ultranationalists. So maybe you should be hoping and praying for such a result in this conflict.
 
Last edited:
He certainly has proven himself not to be the peace maker or deal maker he has always claimed to be. However, I think it's premature to say the US is entering a new war we will have to wait and see what Iran's response will be. I think, like Presidents before him who have had to face difficult situations and make hard calls, Trump learned just how tough that can be and that personality , even his, doesn't solve big problems. I just wish he hand Hegseth would stop making this all about him and how wonderful he is. He made a decion, that's his job, the military executed it.
 
And once upon a time we fought a war with Germany, Italy, and Japan. We dropped two devastating bombs on Japan and what has been the result? All three are now allies and Japan with the help of the U.S. is a democratic state and a great trade partner. Prior to the war is was a form of Constitutional Monarchy with power shifting to the military and the ultranationalists. So maybe you should be hoping and praying for such a result in this conflict.
Will be interesting to see how his "wonderful" relationships with the leaders of other countries in the ME evolves. They very much did NOT what this to happen and lobbied against it.
 
They used to tell us history would judge Bush kindly for Iraq two decades on and we allsee it for the cluster**** it was (as if we didn't then).

Same with Trump and this. Going overseas and picking foreign military adventures rarely ends well these days.

More so because like Netanyahu, convicted felon Donald Trump may use perpetual conflict to solidify his power at home beyond the limits of the constitution.
Since the Gulf War, Iraq has undergone significant transformations, marked by political instability, conflict, and social upheaval, but also with some signs of progress and resilience. The initial conflict led to regime change, followed by years of war, insurgency, and sectarian violence. While large-scale conflict has largely subsided, Iraq continues to face challenges related to security, governance, and economic development.

Here's a more detailed look at the changes:

Political Instability and Conflict:
  • Regime Change:
    The Gulf War led to the end of Saddam Hussein's rule, but the subsequent US-led invasion in 2003 brought about a new period of conflict and instability.

  • Insurgency and Terrorism:
    Iraq experienced a protracted insurgency and the rise of groups like ISIS, which controlled significant territory and caused widespread displacement and suffering.

  • Sectarian Violence:
    The power vacuum after the invasion led to increased sectarian tensions and violence between Sunni and Shia communities.

  • Political System:
    Iraq's political system is still evolving, with a consociational system based on power-sharing among different ethnic and sectarian groups.
Economic and Social Challenges:
  • Economic Instability:
    Iraq's economy is heavily reliant on oil, making it vulnerable to price fluctuations and hindering diversification.

  • Infrastructure Damage:
    Conflict has severely damaged Iraq's infrastructure, including its oil and gas facilities, electricity grid, and transportation networks.

  • Displacement and Humanitarian Crisis:
    Millions of Iraqis have been displaced by conflict, and the country faces ongoing humanitarian challenges.

  • Youth Bulge:
    Iraq has a large young population, which presents both opportunities and challenges for the country's future.
Signs of Progress and Resilience:
  • Reduced Violence:
    While challenges remain, large-scale conflict has largely subsided, and there has been a period of relative stability in recent years.

  • Democratic Institutions:
    Iraq has established democratic institutions, including a parliament and an elected government.

  • Economic Development:
    Efforts are underway to diversify the economy, attract foreign investment, and improve infrastructure.

  • Regional Diplomacy:
    Iraq has strengthened its regional relationships and is playing a more active role in regional diplomacy.
In conclusion, the Gulf War marked a turning point in Iraq's history, ushering in a period of significant change. While the country has faced immense challenges, it has also demonstrated resilience and made progress in certain areas. The long-term impact of the Gulf War and subsequent conflicts continues to shape Iraq's political, economic, and social landscape.
The question. Where they better off then or now?
 
Which is a more peaceful state of a affairs, Iran with or without nuclear weapons?
If you had a den of poisonous snakes in your yard would you live next to them and try to get along or would you remove them?
 
Since the Gulf War, Iraq has undergone significant transformations, marked by political instability, conflict, and social upheaval, but also with some signs of progress and resilience. The initial conflict led to regime change, followed by years of war, insurgency, and sectarian violence. While large-scale conflict has largely subsided, Iraq continues to face challenges related to security, governance, and economic development.

Here's a more detailed look at the changes:

Political Instability and Conflict:
  • Regime Change:
    The Gulf War led to the end of Saddam Hussein's rule, but the subsequent US-led invasion in 2003 brought about a new period of conflict and instability.

  • Insurgency and Terrorism:
    Iraq experienced a protracted insurgency and the rise of groups like ISIS, which controlled significant territory and caused widespread displacement and suffering.

  • Sectarian Violence:
    The power vacuum after the invasion led to increased sectarian tensions and violence between Sunni and Shia communities.

  • Political System:
    Iraq's political system is still evolving, with a consociational system based on power-sharing among different ethnic and sectarian groups.
Economic and Social Challenges:
  • Economic Instability:
    Iraq's economy is heavily reliant on oil, making it vulnerable to price fluctuations and hindering diversification.

  • Infrastructure Damage:
    Conflict has severely damaged Iraq's infrastructure, including its oil and gas facilities, electricity grid, and transportation networks.

  • Displacement and Humanitarian Crisis:
    Millions of Iraqis have been displaced by conflict, and the country faces ongoing humanitarian challenges.

  • Youth Bulge:
    Iraq has a large young population, which presents both opportunities and challenges for the country's future.
Signs of Progress and Resilience:
  • Reduced Violence:
    While challenges remain, large-scale conflict has largely subsided, and there has been a period of relative stability in recent years.

  • Democratic Institutions:
    Iraq has established democratic institutions, including a parliament and an elected government.

  • Economic Development:
    Efforts are underway to diversify the economy, attract foreign investment, and improve infrastructure.

  • Regional Diplomacy:
    Iraq has strengthened its regional relationships and is playing a more active role in regional diplomacy.
In conclusion, the Gulf War marked a turning point in Iraq's history, ushering in a period of significant change. While the country has faced immense challenges, it has also demonstrated resilience and made progress in certain areas. The long-term impact of the Gulf War and subsequent conflicts continues to shape Iraq's political, economic, and social landscape.
The question. Where they better off then or now?
Is that AI generated? If so, according to the new rule 9 a) you are suppose to identify it as such.
 
Which is a more peaceful state of a affairs, Iran with or without nuclear weapons?
Somebody should keep track of how many posts you make over the next month of you running cover for Trump.

That shit would be funny.
 
Somebody should keep track of how many posts you make over the next month of you running cover for Trump.

That shit would be funny.
After they track how often you avoid a direct question in order to engage in trivial matters.
 
Seems like he's coming round to Putin's style of "peace making."
 
After they track how often you avoid a direct question in order to engage in trivial matters.
You should just admit that you constantly run cover for Trump.

It might actually make you feel better about yourself.
 
Which is a more peaceful state of a affairs, Iran with or without nuclear weapons?
Clearly Iran with nuclear weapons, as if they had them the US and Israel wouldn’t have dared to attack in the first place.
 
Back
Top Bottom