Trump Never Defended Calls To ‘Hang Mike Pence,’ But Shameless Media Can’t Stop Lying About It

[Schism]

More dishonest debating by the person who condones the 1/06 attacks.

Criminal proceedings in the January 6 United States Capitol attack - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Any charged with insurrection? Any charged with "attempted" insurrection? Nope.

Do you want to hear what Biden's AG says about your insurrection claim? You already know, don't you?

 

[Crakhobarbie]

Who has been charged with insurrection? Name names.

Below are some tidbits from foleygriffen.com.


Insurrection refers specifically to acts of violence, but it is far from the only charge that could apply to those who stormed the Capitol in 2021. Seditious conspiracy, for instance, is an effort to overthrow the U.S. government, and the punishment includes up to 20 years in prison. Individuals can be charged with sedition and conspiracy even if they never carry out the violence they planned.

Other current and potential charges tied to the storming of the Capitol include:

• Trespassing in a federal building
• Violent entry and disorderly conduct
• Obstructing a law enforcement officer during a civil disorder
• Unlawful entry of restricted buildings or grounds
• Theft of public money, property, or records

Nassau County Lawyers | Foley Griffin Attorneys at Law

With 50+ years of experience, Nassau County lawyers at Foley Griffin, LLP handle a wide range of cases. Call now for a FREE consultation.

www.foleygriffin.com

 

[Schism]

Below are some tidbits from foleygriffen.com.


Insurrection refers specifically to acts of violence, but it is far from the only charge that could apply to those who stormed the Capitol in 2021. Seditious conspiracy, for instance, is an effort to overthrow the U.S. government, and the punishment includes up to 20 years in prison. Individuals can be charged with sedition and conspiracy even if they never carry out the violence they planned.

Other current and potential charges tied to the storming of the Capitol include:

• Trespassing in a federal building
• Violent entry and disorderly conduct
• Obstructing a law enforcement officer during a civil disorder
• Unlawful entry of restricted buildings or grounds
• Theft of public money, property, or records

Nassau County Lawyers | Foley Griffin Attorneys at Law

With 50+ years of experience, Nassau County lawyers at Foley Griffin, LLP handle a wide range of cases. Call now for a FREE consultation.

www.foleygriffin.com

So no insurrection. We already knew.

 

[Schism]

In case you missed AG Garland's testimony...

AG Garland Debunks Democrat 'Insurrection' Claims About January 6th

 

[Schism]

Below are some tidbits from foleygriffen.com.


Insurrection refers specifically to acts of violence, but it is far from the only charge that could apply to those who stormed the Capitol in 2021. Seditious conspiracy, for instance, is an effort to overthrow the U.S. government, and the punishment includes up to 20 years in prison. Individuals can be charged with sedition and conspiracy even if they never carry out the violence they planned.

Other current and potential charges tied to the storming of the Capitol include:

• Trespassing in a federal building
• Violent entry and disorderly conduct
• Obstructing a law enforcement officer during a civil disorder
• Unlawful entry of restricted buildings or grounds
• Theft of public money, property, or records

Nassau County Lawyers | Foley Griffin Attorneys at Law

With 50+ years of experience, Nassau County lawyers at Foley Griffin, LLP handle a wide range of cases. Call now for a FREE consultation.

www.foleygriffin.com

By your own link...is-insurrection-a-crime-

Insurrection is a chargeable crime and yet nobody has been charge with it. You knew this.
This is what liberals do - lie, misrepresent and mischaracterize, exaggerate, engage in hysteria, then lie some more.

 

[Phys251]

Any charged with insurrection? Any charged with "attempted" insurrection? Nope.

Do you want to hear what Biden's AG says about your insurrection claim? You already know, don't you?

Multiple charges and convictions, all listed in the source given. But please, continue with your rightist lie that there was nothing worth criminally charging.

 

[Schism]

Multiple charges and convictions, all listed in the source given. But please, continue with your rightist lie that there was nothing worth criminally charging.

Any of those charges insurrection? Can you even give a straight answer, or just going to continue dodging the entire point you tried to make...you know, the one about an insurrection, the same event that AG Garland says he hasn't charged anyone with?

 

[Schism]

But please, continue with your rightist lie that there was nothing worth criminally charging.

^^ Oh look, a new claim: "your rightist lie that there was nothing worth criminally charging"

Can you point to the post where I said that? I'll wait right here.

 

[Schism]

Standing by....

 

[Phys251]

Any of those charges insurrection? Can you even give a straight answer, or just going to continue dodging the entire point you tried to make...you know, the one about an insurrection, the same event that AG Garland says he hasn't charged anyone with?

Everything righties accuse others of doing, they do or enable themselves. Everything. Such as, for instance, pretending that there was nothing wrong in the 1/06 insurrection worth charging.

 

[Crakhobarbie]

Now it's "attempted" insurrection. You guys need to get together and compare notes.

No need. If Donald's miscreant band of cosplay morons would of "succeeded", then it would of been an "insurrection". Since they did not succeed it was an "attempted insurrection". But, since they did "attempt" an Insurrection, they are still, by definition " Insurrectionists". Is that too much for you? I can explain it again if need be.

Who has been charged with "attempted" insurrection, anyone at all?

See post #102

LOL! It's like the Russia collusion hoax, but instead of collusion it's insurrection.

Pardon me, "attempted" insurrection

I can see your still very confused. Some people have an extremely difficult time understanding certain things. Just let me know if you'd like more help.

 

[Schism]

Everything righties accuse others of doing, they do or enable themselves. Everything. Such as, for instance, pretending that there was nothing wrong in the 1/06 insurrection worth charging.

Quote me, unless you're lying. Are you lying again?

I think so. Standing by to read my quote...

 

[Schism]

No need. If Donald's miscreant band of cosplay morons would of "succeeded", then it would of been an "insurrection". Since they did not succeed it was an "attempted insurrection". But, since they did "attempt" an Insurrection, they are still, by definition " Insurrectionists". Is that too much for you? I can explain it again if need be.


See post #102

I can see your still very confused. Some people have an extremely difficult time understanding certain things. Just let me know if you'd like more help.

Look at that!! Crackhobarbie can backpedal all the way up hill!!

AMAZING!!

 

[Crakhobarbie]

So no insurrection. We already knew.

Attempted insurrection. If one attempts an insurrection, that makes them "insurrectionists" by dictionary definition.

 

[Phys251]

Attempted insurrection. If one attempts an insurrection, that makes them "insurrectionists" by dictionary definition.

The person you are responding to is doing mental gymnastics to try to show that an insurrection is not an insurrection.

 

[Schism]

Attempted insurrection. If one attempts an insurrection, that makes them "insurrectionists" by dictionary definition.

And who exactly has been charged with attempted insurrection?

 

[Schism]

The person you are responding to is doing mental gymnastics to try to show that an insurrection is not an insurrection.

You can't show where any law enforcement entity agrees with you.

SO you made up something else I didn't say about charging people with trespassing and assault.

You're lying, you've been caught, and my work is done. You are both dismissed.

 

[Phys251]

You can't show where any law enforcement entity agrees with you.

SO you made up something else I didn't say about charging people with trespassing and assault.

You're lying, you've been caught, and my work is done. You are both dismissed.

I accept your surrender.

Quote me, unless you're lying. Are you lying again?

I think so. Standing by to read my quote...

You don't want us to accept that you refuse to admit that 1/06 was an insurrection. Since you demand quotes, here's just one:

So no insurrection. We already knew.

The bigger question is why you don't believe that the insurrection was an insurrection. @Crakhobarbie has already proven the case, but you don't want to accept the truth.

 

[Schism]

I accept your surrender.



You don't want us to accept that you refuse to admit that 1/06 was an insurrection. Since you demand quotes, here's just one:



The bigger question is why you don't believe that the insurrection was an insurrection. @Crakhobarbie has already proven the case, but you don't want to accept the truth.

So you can't point to any insurrection charges then. We both already knew this.

 

[Phys251]

So you can't point to any insurrection charges then. We both already knew this.

And now you're lying about dismissing me? Keep it up--you're putting on a comedy show now.

 

[Schism]

And now you're lying about dismissing me? Keep it up--you're putting on a comedy show now.

^^ This is what it looks like when a person makes claims they can't back up, is confronted with legal definitions, then tries to attribute another lie to me that they can't back up. It's not the first time either. I've had to back this poster into a corner with their own words on numerous occasions and it always end the same way...

Falsely accusing me of lying, when it was them all along. You may go now.

 

[Phys251]

^^ This is what it looks like when a person makes claims they can't back up, is confronted with legal definitions, then tries to attribute another lie to me that they can't back up. It's not the first time either. I've had to back this poster into a corner with their own words on numerous occasions and it always end the same way...

Falsely accusing me of lying, when it was them all along.

I've said it before, I'll say it again: Everything righties accuse others of doing, they do or enable themselves. Everything.

Also, in regards to 1/06, righties NEVER call out the lies, distortions, and violent rhetoric from one of their own. Ever.

Trying to get you to accept the truth about 1/06 is impossible. You downplay that insurrection for sure. Do you condone it as well?

You may go now.

Make me.

 

[Schism]

I've said it before, I'll say it again: Everything righties accuse others of doing, they do or enable themselves. Everything.

Also, in regards to 1/06, righties NEVER call out the lies, distortions, and violent rhetoric from one of their own. Ever.

Trying to get you to accept the truth about 1/06 is impossible. You downplay that insurrection for sure. Do you condone it as well?



Make me.

^^ When all is lost, repeat the debunked lies and acuse your opponent of condoning the fabricated claim.

Pathetic. You obviously never took a debate class. Your prof would have locked you out.

 

[Phys251]

^^ When all is lost, repeat the debunked lies and acuse your opponent of condoning the fabricated claim.

Except you do. You can't condemn 1/06 for reasons only you can explain.

Pathetic. You obviously never took a debate class. Your prof would have locked you out.

Finally you resort to the puerile insults. Was wondering what took you so long.

But hey, it is good to see that you have given up your efforts to try to dictate whether I can post here.

 

[redbeer]

Nope. He called Satchel Paige "the great negro" during a Veterans Day speech.

We know that the liberal media and their DP sycophants would be screaming "racist" had it been Trump.

Conversely, had Biden spoken the exact same words using the same phrasing as Trump did when speaking about 1/6? They would be here quoting their fact checkers and voice cadence experts, body language gurus, facial expression pioneers, etc.

It's all fake outrage and Trump'd-up charges to convict the orange monster because, well, he's so despised its neurological.

Yes, "neurological" is the key word.