• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump merchandise sold at Fort Bragg for president's speech now under review

Why? Are military personnel not allowed to have things? Are they illegal items?
The base selling political merchandise is the problem. For the same reason the White House isn’t supposed to be hawking Beans and Teslers. I don’t think you’ll understand.
 
Strong in this thread the sealioning is.
 
The base selling political merchandise is the problem.
I don't think it's the base selling it I think it's merchants selling it
For the same reason the White House isn’t supposed to be hawking Beans and Teslers. I don’t think you’ll understand.
I don't think the White House is silly beads or whatever the hell a Tesler is
 
Because that would be the problem politicizing the military

What law?

Will I get that you said it's about people selling it what law prohibits selling this sort of thing

So you should be able to show me the law. Go for military protocol for that matter.
"The Army remains committed to its core values and apolitical service to the nation," said Col. Mary Ricks, a spokesperson for the XVIII Airborne Corps and Fort Bragg.

"The Army does not endorse political merchandise or the views it represents," Ricks added. "The vendor's presence is under review to determine how it was permitted and to prevent similar occurrences in the future."
 
I don't think it's the base selling it I think it's merchants selling it

I don't think the White House is silly beads or whatever the hell a Tesler is
On the base. DO try to keep up.
 
Versus your Cherry picked nonsense. I'm going by observation and you're going by orange bad reeeeeee

Yours is dubious

Those are question marks do you know what these are &&&
How to show us you never served without saying you've never served. 🤭
 
"The Army remains committed to its core values and apolitical service to the nation," said Col. Mary Ricks, a spokesperson for the XVIII Airborne Corps and Fort Bragg.
and this means?
"The Army does not endorse political merchandise or the views it represents," Ricks added. "The vendor's presence is under review to determine how it was permitted and to prevent similar occurrences in the future."
 
How to show us you never served without saying you've never served. 🤭
I never served in the military I don't claim to have served in the military never did.

So what's the magical spell that happens to you when you serve the military to answer the simple question that you're too incompetent answer?
 
He's just making a dumb **** argument to stir the pot is all.
He seems to be talking a lot about experiencing butt hurt, that’s the main thing I’ve gathered from @CLAX1911’s posts on this thread. I hope he’s able to fix whatever has gone wrong with his butt.
 
Asking questions is sealioning to people who are too incompetent to answer them.
The article lays out the problem very clearly: the military and its personnel are supposed to remain apolitical.

I see you consistently struggle to understand what other people post and what is included in articles linked. Here, you claim it is due to incompetence in answering. In other threads, you have alluded to people being ineffective at communicating. When the same issues seem to repeat themselves with multiple posters, at some point, some introspection is required. It's a you problem.
 
Why?

Yes asking why I'm so bent up into a pretzel for asking people why?

The stretching to ask the simplest question is so exhausting.
The cool part of your posts is how we all know you’d react if Democrat merch were sold on an Army base! You’d lose mind and make so many posts about your butt being hurt! Ah, that would be amazing.

Don’t ever stop being Clax, Clax. Donald will never even know that you exist, but we’ll still appreciate how you carry the torch for him. Well, appreciate is not the right word. We’ll recognize it. So there’s that.
 
The cool part of your posts is how we all know you’d react if Democrat merch were sold on an Army base!
Yeah with pity for the poor person trying to sell trash no one wants.

Lol
You’d lose mind and make so many posts about your butt being hurt! Ah, that would be amazing.
The sadness of someone trying to sell something that nobody wants?
Don’t ever stop being Clax, Clax.
Couldn't stop if I tried
Donald will never even know that you exist,
No politician ever would why would they?
but we’ll still appreciate how you carry the torch for him. Well, appreciate is not the right word. We’ll recognize it. So there’s that.
You do what you got to do.
 
It is Trump's America now. That includes His military.

MAGA.
Amazing how a simple corrupt individual can easily hijack a Republic and turn it into HIS Republic due to the sad state of affairs the nation found itself in with having two corrupt parties as a norm and tradition for over 150 years.
 
Reading minds no. What are you ask you with something beats by asking you to explain it.

Did you seriously don't know this?
I think he meant, "Reading minds no. Asking you to explain it beats assuming your meaning." Or something to that effect.

Anyway, I don't see why any mind reading is necessary from what Col. Mary Ricks said. I thought the statements were self-explanatory. The act of purchasing items tied to political affiliation violates their adherence to being apolitical while in uniform and/or on base. Purchasing and owning politically tied items shows support for what those items represent. Simply allowing the sale of such items creates an avenue for political expression within a space that is meant to remain neutral. The concern isn’t just the individual purchase but the broader implication that political affiliation is being integrated into military culture, even if unintentionally.
 
Reading is not your thing huh?
Reading minds no. What are you ask you with something beats by asking you to explain it.

Did you seriously don't know this
I think he meant, "Reading minds no. Asking you to explain it beats assuming your meaning." Or something to that effect.

Anyway, I don't see why any mind reading is necessary from what Col. Mary Ricks said. I thought the statements were self-explanatory. The act of purchasing items tied to political affiliation violates their adherence to being apolitical while in uniform and/or on base. Purchasing and owning politically tied items shows support for what those items represent. Simply allowing the sale of such items creates an avenue for political expression within a space that is meant to remain neutral. The concern isn’t just the individual purchase but the broader implication that political affiliation is being integrated into military culture, even if unintentionally.
That's how you explain something thank you.
 
Sorry it's not illegal for military personnel to disagree with you. Thought illegal for them to have things that it's legal for everyone else to have.

You are mistaken.
A fallacy, and a weak one at that, do better..
 
Back
Top Bottom