• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump Launches War On Iran

Behind closed doors, middle east leadership and oil sheikhs are on a weekend drunk celebrating this event.
No doubt. They will make a bunch of money as prices likely soar.
Quite honestly, the only possible credible nuclear threat in the region is Israel.
I agree. I don’t trust Bibi at all - if backed into a corner, I don’t doubt he’d use his nukes. He’s proven he’s willing to commit horrific atrocities.
Look, you're a smart guy. I know you don't actually believe that.
You trust Bibi not to use his nukes if cornered? I don’t.
They’re functioning uranium processing facilities. There are probably trucks coming and going there all the time.
Or they took all the uranium out of there ahead of the attack and now have any important stuff moved somewhere else and all we did was damage facilities - which is good, I guess?

We don’t even know the extent of the damage that was done…and we dropped what % of our supply of “bunker buster” bombs?

In another thread I saw where maybe we had 20? And used 14?
 

You are lying.

This is the first part of the code, which you intentionally left out:


(c)Presidential executive power as Commander-in-Chief; limitation

The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces.

--

This part, at the beginning of the code, tells the President WHEN he has the authority to send troops into harm’s way without Congressional approval.

The parts you are quoting are the procedural rules that apply AFTER the President has sent troops into harm's way.

We have not been attacked. The military strike yesterday was an illegal act of war conducted without Congressional approval.

Trump must be immediately impeached and removed from office.
 
Last edited:
The test will be if Netanyahu keeps banging the drum to "finish the job" and try to take out the regime. If the extent of the US attack is limited to these bombings he might be spared the scorn of the MAGAverse who don't want any involvement in foreign conflicts. I don't think there's much argument about the Islamic regime in Iran is less than ideal, but without a real sense of what comes after it there's the risk of inviting a lot of chaos in the vacuum its absence will create, and that's exactly the kind of scenario some in the MAGAverse and liberals are looking to avoid.
 
That isn’t in the realm of possibility. They tried something stupid like that once - when they mined the Gulf. Didn’t end well for them. And of course the pirate terrorists haven’t succeeded in stopping trade either.

If you're speaking of during the Iran-Iraq War, it brought Oil prices to $112 buck a barrel!
 
Which Iran said would happen.

33 years of trying to get at Iran and bibi found his gullible morons in Maga

the existential terror of active warfare plays into the hands of authoritarians and incumbents


Trump, Netanyahu, and Khamenei play themselves in a heartwarming story of authoritarians working together to prop each other up despite their differences
 
Other than the multiple attacks on US troops in 2024 by Iran controlled militias.

"Heightened effects"
Other than the multiple attacks on US troops in 2024 by Iran controlled militias.

When you jump-in in the middle of a conversation, you might consider looking back to understand the subject of the conversation.

In this case, it was in reference to the actions linked below.

Here:

 

No, I'm speaking of the highly-enriched weapons' grade uranium these centrifuges were supposedly producing.

Where is it?
 
A bit of that, but likely driven by wanting to side with who he thinks is winning and will ultimately "win". The question is what "winning" actually means, which has been a mixed bag of goals from eliminating Iran's nuclear program which this does not do to regime change that this doesn't do either.
 
I'm sure the preferer being beaten to death because they took off their headpiece in public. Ask any woman, I'm sure they'd agree with you.
Our coup started all of this.

Because those damned Iranians decided it was their oil under their ground. Not Britain’s.

We put their autocrat back in power twice.

And then we got the Mullahs.

Cause and effect.

Another mess WE MADE.

All we had to do is watch them and wait for a handful more years for enough of the old bastards to die off.

trump just empowered the mullahs. Again.
 
And we probably got the Iraqi WMDs Bush could never find too, huh?
 

That Hegseth is an "architect" of the Iran Nuclear Strikes, is about as alarming as it gets.
 
Last edited:
Not much. It would have been a cave in, no time for ejecta.

I can't imagine the collapse beating the expellation of the initial combustion gases, but Fair enough.

I was surprised to see such well-formed holes, to be honest.
 
If Iran indeed has enriched materials, it wasn't in Fordow. Which again - is my point.
Le sigh. I’ll try to explain this simply for those who aren’t familiar with the science. Iran has enriched uranium. That is what these facilities do because you can’t just throw rocks into a nuclear reactor. The radioactivity of uranium is very minor until it is used as fuel in one of Iran’s 5 nuclear reactors located elsewhere. Until then, you’re not going to detect it over background radiation because it’s such a common element. It’s everywhere. Hell, we’ve been making glassware and jewelry with it since the 18th century.

But it becomes extremely radioactive when you bombard it with neutrons in a reactor. The highly desired byproduct of this - for a nuclear weapons program - is plutonium. We don’t know where Iran is storing that but there is no doubt they have it.
 

Then with all of this, if we agree to your supposition, how do we know the highly enriched materials were indeed down there? If at all? Or, if somewhere else?
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…