• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump is complaining about "planting evidence" does this means he knows the FBI likely found something and needs an excuse?

Trump is complaining about "planting evidence" does this means he knows the FBI likely found somethi

  • Yes, making conspiracy theories is how he tries to evade responsibility

    Votes: 60 92.3%

  • No, the FBI is deep state and Trump is simply pointing that out

    Votes: 5 7.7%
  • Total voters
    65
ALiberalModerate said:
The DOJ had to explain the reason for the raid when they went before a judge and showed probable cause. That piece of shit Trump has a copy of the warrant. He can always release it.
Click to expand...
And hopefully he will. In the meantime, angry leftists like you lack any intellectual curiosity
 
Rexedgar said:
I know it goes against DOJ long-standing tradition, but the longer there are questions concerning the FBI execution of the search warrant on Mar a Lago, the longer the loony fringe has to get themselves in a lather.
Click to expand...
Trump can release the search warrant and list of items himself but he refuses to do so, that should tell you something.
 
ALiberalModerate said:
The DOJ had to explain the reason for the raid when they went before a judge and showed probable cause. That piece of shit Trump has a copy of the warrant. He can always release it.
Click to expand...
Which lends credence to the theory that Trump is shrieking about planted evidence to preempt the FBI's findings. Time will tell.
 
NOVA66 said:
Trump can release the search warrant and list of items himself but he refuses to do so, that should tell you something.
Click to expand...
It tells me he's enjoying watching Biden's stormtroopers getting vilified.
 
Logician Man said:
Fletch, when a poster has to resort to putting 'his' words into 'another' poster's mouth as a 'debating argument', that poster has clearly conceded the argument. Just trying to save you further embarrassment going forword.
Click to expand...
I didnt put words into anyones mouth. Thats just you lying. I said none of you care about the facts and dont want to know them. Thats just a fact exposed in this thread.
 
Fletch said:
Why is it you libs just love to not know things? There is no reason the DOJ cant explain the reason behind the raid. You dont care because 'getting trump' is all the reason you need.
Click to expand...
Is there no reason. I assume the DOJ, if it believes the information is sensitive, would be careful about revealing information too soon. If all this was to accomplish was to retrieve documents Trump refused to surrender, that's that. It puts the DOJ at a disadvantage in the public realm, while Trump can do whatever.
 
Logician Man said:
Aren't you the guy who was just calling out another DP poster for putting forth "mindless drool" in 'your' post# 75 up thread?
Click to expand...
Yes. This thread is filled with mindless leftist drool. You should know, some of it is yours.
 
Nickyjo said:
Is there no reason. I assume the DOJ, if it believes the information is sensitive, would be careful about revealing information too soon. If all this was to accomplish was to retrieve documents Trump refused to surrender, that's that. It puts the DOJ at a disadvantage in the public realm, while Trump can do whatever.
Click to expand...
They can make a statement without revealing any evidence. That would be far better than just spreading leaks throughout the press.
 
Fletch said:
I didnt put words into anyones mouth. Thats just you lying. I said none of you care about the facts and dont want to know them. Thats just a fact exposed in this thread.
Click to expand...
From 'your' post# 66 ---> "You simply don't care what the facts are and don't want to know." <---- Tell this board that isn't 'you' putting 'your' words in 'my' mouth, and, then direct us to this "lie" you claim I put forth.
 
Fletch said:
you have no idea whether the law was followed or not.
Click to expand...

If the law wasn't followed, Trumps attorneys SHOULD be able to rip the FBI and whoever else is involved, a new asshole.

This stuff isn't capable of being done without a warrant and cause.

I severely doubt there is any judge out there, who would have signed off on something with this gravity, without a good reason, or it better be so...

But you aren't asking this question in good faith, you're planting the seeds of doubt before we really know the story.

It's what you do, lie and gaslight
 
Fletch said:
If it said that, you would still be ok with it.
Click to expand...
If the queen had balls she would be king. If a frog's front legs weren't so short it wouldn't bump its ass when hopping. If, if, if.
 
Jetboogieman said:
If the law wasn't followed, Trumps attorneys SHOULD be able to rip the FBI and whoever else is involved, a new asshole.

This stuff isn't capable of being done without a warrant and cause.

I severely doubt there is any judge out there, who would have signed off on something with this gravity, without a good reason, or it better be so...

But you aren't asking this question in good faith, you're planting the seeds of doubt before we really know the story.

It's what you do, lie and gaslight
Click to expand...
Well looks whos here. Its been months since you dropped by to launch a personal attack on me. Feel better now?
 
Rawley said:
Given their central part in the RUssia Russia Russia hoax, seems he has a pretty solid basis for believing FBI is willing to break the law in order to screw him.
Click to expand...
And a whole bunch of folks believe in some invisible entity with supreme powers actually exists.
 
Fletch said:
I said none of you care about the facts and dont want to know them.
Click to expand...
Wrong again. Some of us can wait until the situation plays out through the justice system. They either found criminal activity or they didn't. Either way, whatever happens happens within the bounds of the law.
 
NOVA66 said:
It tells me he is hiding his corruption.
Click to expand...
LOL Obama lost or destroyed tens of thousands of records. Y'all didn't seem to give two shits about that "corruption"
 
Ethel2 said:
You aren’t entitled to know the reason for the raid. You aren’t entitled to know what they were looking for. You aren’t entitled to know if they found what they were looking for and if they found it what they intend to do with it.
Whatever makes the idiot jackass boot lickers think that the criminal investigation should be carried out in the media is beyond me. Evidence is revealed to a judge and jury, not to the general public.
Click to expand...
Simple to explain, they are entitled.
 
Fletch said:
They can make a statement without revealing any evidence. That would be far better than just spreading leaks throughout the press.
Click to expand...
They did make a statement. We’re you not paying attention? They said the raid had to do with documents that the jackass might have in his possession at his home.
Are you as willing as I am to accept the results of this investigation regardless of where it may lead? If after a trial the jackass is found innocent I am willing to concede that he is in fact innocent though I might not like it. If he is going guilty of committing a crime are you willing to concede that he is in fact guilty even though you might not like it?
 
Rawley said:
LOL Obama lost or destroyed tens of thousands of records. Y'all didn't seem to give two shits about that "corruption"
Click to expand...
No he did not, never happened.
 
bongsaway said:
If the queen had balls she would be king. If a frog's front legs weren't so short it wouldn't bump its ass when hopping. If, if, if.
Click to expand...
No, a queen can have balls and still be queen. Try and keep up with modern culture.
 
Ethel2 said:
They did make a statement. We’re you not paying attention? They said the raid had to do with documents that the jackass might have in his possession at his home.
Are you as willing as I am to accept the results of this investigation regardless of where it may lead? If after a trial the jackass is found innocent I am willing to concede that he is in fact innocent though I might not like it. If he is going guilty of committing a crime are you willing to concede that he is in fact guilty even though you might not like it?
Click to expand...
Who made this statement?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom