• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump: I could declassify documents by thinking about it

They are going to have to if they bring a court case against him.


Not they don't.

They do not have to argue that the President doesn't have the power to declassify, they have to argue that the FPOTUS didn't declassify them during his term in office and continued to treat them as classified even after leaving office. They will just need to show that the FPOTUS is attempting to retroactively claim declassification.

WW
 
Garland has said that the law will be applied "evenly". If some of those documents represent a threat to our national security then the orange pustule will also be charged with espionage.
BTW, I read somewhere that additional documents were move out of MEL and may be stored elsewhere. Lets see how that plays out. Could be more search warrants in the future.
 
You're framing the question wrong.

The question is, how does a former President prove he declassified stuff?
Since when did the accused have to probe anything. The burden is on the prosecution to probe that he did not beyond a reasonable doubt.
 
So people can just copy national security information and poof they are personal records?

That's one hell of a loophole to the espionage act! All you need is a xerox machine!
Or these days, a phone. Hey, wait, maybe that is why you can't take that into a SCIF when you are viewing classified docs?
No wait, that can't be true, or the whole concept of a copy being a personal record flies the **** out the window.
 
Backatha.

If they are copies, they are personal records.

What with the "IF" statement?
Has Trump or his lawyers made the claim that the documents were "copies"?
Who has the originals? NARA doesn't. Isn't that why NARA asked for the documents to be returned. Did the FBI or DOJ say they only found copies at MAL?

Your turn
 
LOL..... Ok, dismiss away.
 
So people can just copy national security information and poof they are personal records?

That's one hell of a loophole to the espionage act! All you need is a xerox machine!
Please keep up with the thread if you'd like to participate. Presidential records v personal records. Nothing to do with their classification.
 
Since when did the accused have to probe anything. The burden is on the prosecution to probe that he did not beyond a reasonable doubt.
The prosecution presented evidence of classification. This evidence was accepted by Dearie in his SM role and by the 11th circuit court of appeals.
 
Since when did the accused have to probe anything. The burden is on the prosecution to probe that he did not beyond a reasonable doubt.
In requesting a Special Master, Trump is the plaintiff. So the burden is on him.
 
Just like the $cientologists will never accept that L. Ron was pumped full of psych meds when he died....
 
Please keep up with the thread if you'd like to participate. Presidential records v personal records. Nothing to do with their classification.
the other ~10,900 records will be reviewed by Dearie.

the ~100 classified documents are out of the game.

Also, you should review the topic of the thread if you don't think it has to do with classification. Its not a matter of me not keeping up since the topic of the thread is known.
 
Since when did the accused have to probe anything. The burden is on the prosecution to probe that he did not beyond a reasonable doubt.
He is not the accused as it relates to the SM . He is the one who sought the appointment. That's why Donnie is paying the tab.
 
Since when did the accused have to probe anything. The burden is on the prosecution to probe that he did not beyond a reasonable doubt.

This is the part some don't get. They don't have to prove that the FPOTUS **didn't** declassify. They have to show that the documents were and are still classified from the government perspective.

At that point it is on the FPOTUS to then present evidence as an affirmative defense to counter the DOJ's evidence and show they are incorrect.

The DOJ does not have the burden to prove a negative.

WW
 
Funny how he only says this to the media but his lawyers have never, not once, claimed he declassified any of the docs that were retrieved? Lie on Hannity - no consequences. Lie in a legal document to a court = PERJURY and his latest group of lawyers would be held responsible to the lies as well as Trump would be. It's really a simple bullshit meter. Say it on Hannity but not to a court = BULLSHIT.
 
Just like the $cientologists will never accept that L. Ron was pumped full of psych meds when he died....
Or utter bullshit flights of grandiose delirious illusions while he was still alive.
 
So, Biden can say that he re-classified all the documents in his mind on his inauguration day and you would be OK with that?
I am sure he "thought about it".
Its mind boggling the lengths to which the MAGATS will support their jackass despite all the evidence that he is a lying scumbag and a criminal. At some point wouldn't you think that the overwhelming cases against him would make them give pause and reevaluate their positions?
 
Backatha.

If they are copies, they are personal records.

That is incorrect. Documents generated during the term of office are still Presidential Records under the PRA of 1978, copies made for convenience of personal reference must be clearly marked as so. Wanna bet the documents confiscated from MAL do not have the required copy markings?

(Which of course would matter for the classified documents because if illegal copies were made, those copies would still be classified at the same level.)

WW
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…