He never had any objection to giving them to the NA. They were working on it (just like Obama is working on his records) and the NA and FBI and DOJ double-crossed him.
The links I provided prove that the facility was not vacant after it was leased by NARA to sort out and hold temporarily Obama's records. The same facility was also modified by NARA to have a secured compartment which could hold the classified materials according to the legal requirements that NARA has to follow.A vacant furniture warehouse is far better. Most likely vacant because it's in a crap area prone to break-ins and theft at night.
At least he admits to the gaslighting, In his mind if something is said by the left 10,000 times it must be true and anyone who isn't a believer is a sinner.All I can do is present the facts...even when there are "10,000 responses" from people who disregard the facts.
It was in his frigging house, a place certainly more secure than some warehouse in a Chicago ghetto. Stop with this nonsense. his house is behind gates and watched by the Secret Service.Just to let you know that your claim of double-lock was lacking in correctness.
For 16 of the 18 months that the FPOTUS was in illegal possession of government property (which included classified documents), there was no double-lock.
But as I said, I appreciate that they installed one while the DOJ was getting the search warrant. Good on them.
WW
okie dokieShoulda woulda coulda. I'm stoked for the blues festival this weekend.
Here. Something worthwhile.
Bonnie won't be there, but Carolyn's at the Tahoe Stage 3:00 tomorrow. Hell yeah.
You go back to whatever is you're doing.
This is why I have so many posts. I answer nearly every post, no matter how dumb the post is.
It is not the fact that something has been said numerous times. It is the fact that your side is full of intellectual cowards who refuse to address what has been said and refute it with evidence. THIS behavior of yours is evidence that you have lost the argument.At least he admits to the gaslighting, In his mind if something is said by the left 10,000 times it must be true and anyone who isn't a believer is a sinner.
Would you like to bet on it?And also may be 100% correct.
If we’re going by the letter of the constitution than no.
Well, if it goes to court, Trump is going to have to PROVE that the documents were declassified, and merely just thinking it won't be enough in a court of law.All I can do is present the facts...even when there are "10,000 responses" from people who disregard the facts.
Trump's house is the parade ground of foreigners with no security clearance. The facility that was used to store Obama's records was closed to the public, including to foreigners socializing with Obama.It was in his frigging house, a place certainly more secure than some warehouse in a Chicago ghetto. Stop with this nonsense. his house is behind gates and watched by the Secret Service.
Um, cause he declassified them. Did you not get the memo?Ohh, not only Trump had an objection, he lied and was caught keeping classified records in his office. You can squeal as much as you want, but you cannot change the fact that Trump's behavior is unprecedented and all this talk that Trump supposedly did the same thing Trump did is just a lie which has been refuted by the facts.
Why didn't they send the FBI while he was sorting things out? He is still not done after 6 years! The letter from his attorney promised to be done by August of 21 and yet there has been no raid.The links I provided prove that the facility was not vacant after it was leased by NARA to sort out and hold temporarily Obama's records. The same facility was also modified by NARA to have a secured compartment which could hold the classified materials according to the legal requirements that NARA has to follow.
Nope.What you advocate for is a sovereign based purely on the roll of the dice fiction of a special bloodline deigned to rule with no ability for the citizenry to change or alter the institution without the sovereign’s permission.
Really? Most of the "Royal Marriages" that I hear about these days involve "marrying commoners".Might explain Europe’s mad obsession with eugenics among the parasitical ruling classes.
Oh now there you have a point. I don't know how "King Chuck#3" is going to function, but during the reign of Elizabeth II, the legislative leaders met with the monarch on a very routine (and totally "off the record" [as far as what happened at the meetings was concerned]) basis. Since, under the laws of the UK, Parliament has absolutely no ability to enact (which is different than "pass") legislation WITHOUT the concurrence of the monarch, the odds that the monarch had absolutely no impact on the legislation actually "passed" and then "enacted" upon receiving the monarch's signature are actually quite low.The royal family of England is not even as apolitical as most people are told.
We get it pamak. Anything the left says is true. We get it. Especially if it was said 10,000 times it must certainly be true.It is not the fact that something has been said numerous times. It is the fact that your side is full of intellectual cowards who refuse to address what has been said and refute it with evidence. THIS behavior of yours is evidence that you have lost the argument.
You know this how?Trump's house is the parade ground of foreigners with no security clearance. The facility that was used to store Obama's records was closed to the public, including to foreigners socializing with Obama.
Why do you support a thief?Why didn't they send the FBI while he was sorting things out? He is still not done after 6 years! The letter from his attorney promised to be done by August of 21 and yet there has been no raid.
I got it, read it, responded to you showing that the memo did NOT declassify everything, and that the memo DID accept the FBI's recommendations to protect continuing classified information.Um, cause he declassified them. Did you not get the memo?
Why didn't they send the FBI while he was sorting things out? He is still not done after 6 years! The letter from his attorney promised to be done by August of 21 and yet there has been no raid.
You still do not understand that NARA did the sortingWhy didn't they send the FBI while he was sorting things out? He is still not done after 6 years! The letter from his attorney promised to be done by August of 21 and yet there has been no raid.
And your evidence that the Canadian police allowed (which implies an advance knowledge) of First Nations people is - what?Also the canadian police allowed the slaughter of and killed natives up until very recently when the natives were able to seek justice.
No one ever said that monarchies were perfect. Then again, no one (other than Americans) ever claimed that republics (except for the American republic, of course) were perfect.Kinda like basing your nation on the supremacy of the white man de facto or de jure creates a hell of a lot of injustices which are not solved by monarchies eh?
And, for some reason, you believe that the "rich and powerful" in the United States of America are always "held accountable" - why?The position is unaccountable by the people. No thanks. Prince Andrew can continue to leech off the public despite being a pedophile and the queen prevented justice. Its an unacceptable layer of unaccountability. Government of, by, and for the people or nothing. Im glad you like your system but inability to hold someone accountable to the people without revolution is rather unacceptable.
Indeed, they don't and I never said that they did.Monarchies do not solve the problem of unaccountability nor rule by the rich when they can also influence politics the same way Jeff Bezos can.
All well and good - and completely non-responsive to what I posted.1. If the party does in fact represent its constituents.
1a. Regimes do not represent constituents, as minorities are left out.
1b. Trump does represent Trumpers and they are happy with that.
2. Then we are not dealing with merely an individual or even individuals. We are dealing with the rise of an ideology, a perspective, a belief system. That cannot be defeated via assassination.
Thus
3. Representative parties cannot be affected negatively by assassinations.
And noting
4. Regimes are devastated by assassinations.
A win for democracy
Ummm...Well, if it goes to court, Trump is going to have to PROVE that the documents were declassified, and merely just thinking it won't be enough in a court of law.
If Mr. Trump thinks it can't be all that difficult (or usual, for that matter).If a president thinks it, it can't be illegal.
Under the Rules of Evidence, documents prepared in the normal and everyday course of business are admissible to prove the truth of the contents of those documents.Ummm...
I think it's the other way around. Since a President can declassify anything at any time, if this goes to court, it'll be up to the prosecution to prove that stuff has NOT been declassified.
The defense does not have to prove their innocence.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?