• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump calls on Sessions to end Russia probe ‘right now’

White House: Trump tweets on Mueller opinion, not orders

Which is it? Are Trumps Tweets opinion pieces or official POTUS statements? We've been told official POTUS statements.....

Trump's Tweets 'Official Statements,' Spicer Says

DOJ: Donald Trump's tweets are 'official statements of the President'


Keep that fat moron off his phone and you won't have keep walking back his asinine statements.

Someone on Trump's team needs to tell him to preface statements with "I think/feel..." if he's sharing his opinion. It still hasn't sunk in that this is not his personal twitter account as a private citizen.
 
Someone on Trump's team needs to tell him to preface statements with "I think/feel..." if he's sharing his opinion. It still hasn't sunk in that this is not his personal twitter account as a private citizen.

Oh c'mon now, you're reaching... don't you think?
If you don't know the difference between an opinion and a criminal action I don't know what else I can say.
 
that is your opinion, post the data to support your claims of disarray? The ones in disarray are the radicals who are seeing results trump their rhetoric and the public is seeing just how big of a liar the left is

Support claims of disarray? You have to be kidding me, right?

If there is one thing that is clearly evident is disarray in the White House. I don't even know where to begin since there are so many examples of it that they are too long to list.

Nonetheless, let me mention a couple.

Trump has fired (or have quit) 67 people in positions of importance. This is more than double what any other president has done in their entire Presidency. Trump has done it in 180 days.
Trump is the only one in charge as the people he presently has are "yes" men. It is impossible for 1 person to do the job of 100.
Over half of the positions that other Presidents have had in their administrations are not filled in Trump administration, meaning that there are a lot of jobs/government necessities that are not even being addressed.
Trump says one thing one day and the opposite the next day. That is not having a set goal, other that not disappoint his base.
His meetings with leaders of the world is disorganized. He does not have a goal to accomplish or a guideline of how to accomplish it. This is why his meeting with Kim and Vlad were absolute disasters, not to mention the confusion and disorientation that he causes with what are supposed to be out allies.
He has said over 187 times that he "has not colluded with Russia", his representative "Guiliani" is going around saying one thing one day "he has not colluded" and the next day saying "collusion is not a crime" and the next day saying "collusion is not a crime but he has not colluded". Sarah Sanders says one thing and more often than not has to recant what she said.

Confusion? This is the height of Disarray. Find me one example of a company CEO that is in more disarray (you can't) and I will show you someone that is no longer running the company.

Trump has no idea of what he is doing and much less has the people that he will listen to that will guide him given that the only people he wants around him are "yes" men.

In the dictionary under the word "Disarray" there is a picture of Trump.

Be real man!
 
The problem is going to be explaining, for example, emails showing the clearest possible trail of Manafort fraudulently taking financials, adjusting them to add income, then submitting those fraudulent statements to the banks. Or when they introduce his tax returns, and ask how a guy can spend millions and only report a fraction of that amount as taxable income. The matters you highlighted are trivial - not part of the case except to add color.

No the matter i highlighted show what a joke these people are. again the judge smacked them around.
a defense lawyer is going to have a field day with these clowns.

The judge didn't think it was a trivial matter. if he thought it was a trivial matter he wouldn't have smacked them for it.

Good then let them present actual evidence should be pretty easy right? until then they will have to take their butt spanking for what it is.
 
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/399841-trump-calls-on-sessions-to-end-russia-probe



This is the textbook definition of Obstruction of Justice. He just publically called for an end to an investigation into his own campaign before it was completed and attacked the credibility of the investigators.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/legal/obstruction of justice



A further definition which can be found in my auto signature...



If this isn't Obstruction of Justice then nothing is. He should be impeached immediately, but the cowards in the Republican party won't do it.

After everything else that has happened over the past week. He sends this tweet? Incomprehensible.
 
???

What did Trump threaten to do? Did he threaten to fire Mueller or Sessions if they don't do what he says? I didn't hear him say that.

You're missing the point here.

Pres. Trump didn't have to threaten Session's job. By his very position as POTUS and, thus, Session's boss Trump in his Tweet is eluding to how the nation is looking bad (and thus, HIMSELF) the longer this Russia investigation continues. As such, he's attempting to influence Sessions to pull the plug on the investigation so that the nation (and by default HIMSELF) can move beyond the terrible blot that the POTUS perceives is a black-eye on the nation and, thus, HIMSELF.

This is all about Trump. He's simply trying to use his position of power to push Sessions into doing something he really can't do since he recused himself. The only person within the DoJ who can stop the Russia investigation by law is Deputy AG Rosenstein.

Sidenote: Surely, you didn't need me to spell that out for you?
 
LOL a judge today just smacked the crap out of Muellers supposed law team.

Mueller team lectured by judge in Manafort case | Fox News

U.S. District Judge T.S. Ellis III specifically told prosecutors to stop using the word “oligarch” to describe wealthy Ukrainians, whose dealings with Manafort are at the heart of the fraud charges he faces in northern Virginia federal court.

The judge said the term has a “pejorative” meaning and is not relevant in this case. Further, he cautioned that using it could suggest Manafort is associated with bad people – and guilty by association.

“It’s not the American way,” the judge said. He noted that wealthy donors like George Soros or the Koch brothers also could be considered oligarchs.

The Mueller team was later rebuffed again by Ellis when they tried to introduce photos that eventually would become public of Manafort’s closets filled with suits and high-end clothing.

While it’s part of their effort to paint Manafort as a tax scofflaw who spent big on luxury items, Ellis would not allow the photos for now.

“Enough is enough. We don’t convict people because they have a lot of money and throw it around,” he said.

The judge said the photos would seem “unnecessary, irrelevant” and potentially “prejudicial.” Further, he reminded the lawyers that Manafort “is not on trial for having a lavish lifestyle, but for not reporting income on his taxes.”

LMAO

a defense lawyer is going to tear them a new one.

Interesting... shows the maturity level of the prosecuting team and their propensity for using all the buzz words of the day. Oligarchs and rich people, oh so evil... lol
 
I spent 35 years in the private sector and was told a lot of things and always found rhetoric never trumped results. Actions speak a lot louder than words but I do like Trump pissing you people off with the rhetoric and am sure enjoying the results he is generating as is the public which is getting sick and tired of the politics of personal destruction that go against what they are seeing in their own bank accounts. The left is the most poorly educated I have ever seen or the most manipulative by promoting all the lies and distortions, which is it?

One action we can rely on when it comes to Trump, because we have seen it over and over again: For all his tough talk, he generally has other people to do the firing.
 
Trump expressed an opinion. An opinion does not meet any of those conditions you highlighted.

Sorry...no obstruction of justice.

The WH has already declared, in court, that 45's tweets represent official presidential statements. If he doesn't know the difference between opinions and official presidential statements, then perhaps he shouldn't tweet because he just directed his AG to shut down a legitimately authorized investigation that implicates him. That is obstruction of justice.
 
The WH has already declared, in court, that 45's tweets represent official presidential statements. If he doesn't know the difference between opinions and official presidential statements, then perhaps he shouldn't tweet because he just directed his AG to shut down a legitimately authorized investigation that implicates him. That is obstruction of justice.

that is your interpretation

mine is different

ok...so now what...

well, i guess we see what ACTIONS he actually takes....right?

if he fires Rosenstein...or Sessions...then i guess you have your big issue

if not, and the investigation continues...i guess it was a boss bitching....
 
Interesting... shows the maturity level of the prosecuting team and their propensity for using all the buzz words of the day. Oligarchs and rich people, oh so evil... lol

Its perfectly understandable, as it speaks to Manifort's spending habits as a motivation for his need for his ill-gotten gains.
 
Oh c'mon now, you're reaching... don't you think?
If you don't know the difference between an opinion and a criminal action I don't know what else I can say.

Not at all. When you're in a leadership position you need to clarify opinion from orders.

Trump tweet said:
..This is a terrible situation and Attorney General Jeff Sessions should stop this Rigged Witch Hunt right now, before it continues to stain our country any further. Bob Mueller is totally conflicted, and his 17 Angry Democrats that are doing his dirty work are a disgrace to USA!

That others had to rush in for damage control speaks to the problematic nature of this tweet. Had it been a more generic comment like "This is a terrible situation I hope this Rigged Witch Hunt would end right now.." then I would give him some more leeway.
 
The WH has already declared, in court, that 45's tweets represent official presidential statements. If he doesn't know the difference between opinions and official presidential statements, then perhaps he shouldn't tweet because he just directed his AG to shut down a legitimately authorized investigation that implicates him. That is obstruction of justice.

He doesn't know; he doesn't care. Firing up the base is his only goal.
 
Actually, I've very rarely known you to be right. Most of the time, you post one-liners that you've borrowed from elsewhere or images with someone else's words and they never quite fit the topic, so I think most of us assume the majority of topics go over your head.

Like this time.

And now you have so thoroughly derailed this topic from what it originally was, which was yet the latest crazy action by your president. You didn't want to defend what he did, so you played the pathetic What-About-Obama game that your side loves to play.

This is why nobody outside your tRump bubble respects your opinions.
 
Support claims of disarray? You have to be kidding me, right?

If there is one thing that is clearly evident is disarray in the White House. I don't even know where to begin since there are so many examples of it that they are too long to list.

Nonetheless, let me mention a couple.

Trump has fired (or have quit) 67 people in positions of importance. This is more than double what any other president has done in their entire Presidency. Trump has done it in 180 days.
Trump is the only one in charge as the people he presently has are "yes" men. It is impossible for 1 person to do the job of 100.
Over half of the positions that other Presidents have had in their administrations are not filled in Trump administration, meaning that there are a lot of jobs/government necessities that are not even being addressed.
Trump says one thing one day and the opposite the next day. That is not having a set goal, other that not disappoint his base.
His meetings with leaders of the world is disorganized. He does not have a goal to accomplish or a guideline of how to accomplish it. This is why his meeting with Kim and Vlad were absolute disasters, not to mention the confusion and disorientation that he causes with what are supposed to be out allies.
He has said over 187 times that he "has not colluded with Russia", his representative "Guiliani" is going around saying one thing one day "he has not colluded" and the next day saying "collusion is not a crime" and the next day saying "collusion is not a crime but he has not colluded". Sarah Sanders says one thing and more often than not has to recant what she said.

Confusion? This is the height of Disarray. Find me one example of a company CEO that is in more disarray (you can't) and I will show you someone that is no longer running the company.

Trump has no idea of what he is doing and much less has the people that he will listen to that will guide him given that the only people he wants around him are "yes" men.

In the dictionary under the word "Disarray" there is a picture of Trump.

Be real man!

All of which affect you and the country how? we have record employment, pre recession level u-6, historical low African American employment, more spendable income, a booming economy but what the hell according to you he colluded with Russia. Should we then be thanking Russia for giving us Trump? If so, thank you Russia. All this time I thought it was Obama's results

Disarray to you is different than disarray to the electorate who are benefiting from the Trump economy and the fact that you have provided no economic results speaks volumes

You want someone better to do exactly what, grow jobs, grow the economy, allow people to keep more of what they earn? thank you Trump, you got him
 
Interesting... shows the maturity level of the prosecuting team and their propensity for using all the buzz words of the day. Oligarchs and rich people, oh so evil... lol

It shows their incompetence is what it does.

If i was mueller i would be pissed off and fuming at what they did. will he? nope. why?
because he is buried up to his neck in this mess and he has no way out of it.

His way out was to treat this evenly and fairly. now he is pulling a comey.
any respect that he had will go out the window.
 
All of which affect you and the country how? we have record employment, pre recession level u-6, historical low African American employment, more spendable income, a booming economy but what the hell according to you he colluded with Russia. Should we then be thanking Russia for giving us Trump? If so, thank you Russia. All this time I thought it was Obama's results

Disarray to you is different than disarray to the electorate who are benefiting from the Trump economy and the fact that you have provided no economic results speaks volumes

You want someone better to do exactly what, grow jobs, grow the economy, allow people to keep more of what they earn? thank you Trump, you got him

Ah yes, the booming economy and keeping more of what you earn.

Have you ever heard of the adage of "a Wolf in Sheep's clothing"

I believe you have to weigh the good with the bad and see which way the scale tips.

Let me begin by saying that much of what economic benefits have occurred were because the Republicans won and not so much because of Trump. The Tax reform was mostly Congress and the House and they wanted to do that way before Trump came aboard. Yes, the Republicans have to thank Trump that he won the election but other than that, there is little to thank Trump for. Unemployment was already heading lower before Trump came aboard. Trump cannot get the credit for that (see chart below). On the other side of the coin, the negative side of the balance has tipped strongly against Trump, given the amount of hate, discordance, alienation of allies, leaning toward autocracy and etc..........the scales tip in favor of Trump in only 1 respect and that is economic. In the other factors that are important to a nation (morals, respect, ethics, humanity, and good will), Trump has failed horribly, meaning that the scales do not favor Trump as money (especially the SMALL amount that the populace is getting extra) does not compare with damage he is doing.

Sorry, but that is the reality. Like I said often before, if money is your God then Trump is a positive but if happiness, health, moral values, respect and those are important for you, then Trump is a zero.

The numbers are nearly all in now. What they show about what really happened during the eight years that Barack Obama was president is sometimes different from what politicians claimed.

The economy gained a net 11.6 million jobs. The unemployment rate dropped to below the historical norm.
Average weekly earnings for all workers were up 4.0 percent after inflation. The gain was 3.7 percent for just production and nonsupervisory employees.
After-tax corporate profits also set records, as did stock prices. The S&P 500 index rose 166 percent.
The number of people lacking health insurance dropped by 15 million. Premiums rose, but more slowly than before.
The federal debt owed to the public rose 128 percent. Deficits were rising as Obama departed.
Home prices rose 20 percent. But the home ownership rate hit the lowest point in half a century.
Illegal immigration declined: The Border Patrol caught 35 percent fewer people trying to get into the U.S. from Mexico.
Wind and solar power increased 369 percent. Coal production declined 38 percent. Carbon emissions from burning fossil fuel dropped 11 percent.
Production of handguns rose 192 percent, to a record level.
The murder rate dropped to the lowest on record in 2014, then rose and finished at about the same rate as when Obama took office.
 

Attachments

  • Obamasnumbers.webp
    Obamasnumbers.webp
    20.6 KB · Views: 37
Last edited:
One action we can rely on when it comes to Trump, because we have seen it over and over again: For all his tough talk, he generally has other people to do the firing.

And yet the results are on his record and the American people are benefiting, thank you Obama for giving us Trump or maybe it was Russia, anyway THANK YOU
 
You are right, it is only the demonstration of being an imbecile who does not give a crap about the law and you support that.

I'm pretty darn sure President Trump has followed the law a good deal more closely than his predecessor did.
 
IMPEACH THE SOB and let's return to the socialistic policies of Obama and today's radical Democratic Party. Calling for an action only is a violation of the law when it is done by a Republican as words seem to matter more to the left than actions. Now if Trump ended the investigation that would be a different story.

You leftists are truly radicals claiming to care about this country but in truth promoting a radical socialist, open border, free healthcare for all giving that power to federal bureaucrats for there never are any consequences for failure in the leftwing utopian world

Folks would buy into the "actions speak louder than words" argument if those on the Right (particularly those conservative right-wing talking heads on your AM/FM dial) would stop repeating the same old tired lies until they became the truth in the polluted minds of their listeners. Trump takes to Twitter and does the same thing for much the same reason: to persuade or cement a particular narrative into "the court of public opinion". Say a lie enough times and eventually the lie becomes the truth.

Now, as to action Trump hasn't take...you're correct. He hasn't fired Session (or Rosenstein) yet, but that really doesn't matter. For in "the court of public opinion" those polluted minds already firmly believe (now) that Session was a poor choice for USAG and that he should be providing Trump legal cover from Mueller. Thing is logic should tell anyone with a brain that if Trump was so innocent, why would he need legal cover from his AG? Why would he insist that the investigation into Russia meddling in our presidential election and that a U.S. citizen or citizens may have given them "aid and comfort" be stopped?

Folks should really take a slightly different approach to the advice the conservative talking heads gave during the Obama presidency where it comes to the Trump presidency: Pay close attention not only to what (t)he(y) says but what (t)he(y) do, too!
 
that is your interpretation

mine is different

ok...so now what...

well, i guess we see what ACTIONS he actually takes....right?

if he fires Rosenstein...or Sessions...then i guess you have your big issue

if not, and the investigation continues...i guess it was a boss bitching....

Frankly, the only interpretation that matters is Mueller's. It seems likely that 45 already obstructed justice regardless of what additional "actions he actually takes" in the future.
 
Apparently in the liberal world words and action mean the same thing ie actually firing Comey vs talking about it means the same thing? Really?

Ah, but Trump did fire Comey, didn't he...and he gave two completely different reasons for doing so.

1) Mismanagement/lack of confidence/overstepping his authority;

2) "I was gonna fire him anyway over the 'Russia' thing.
 
You are right, it is only the demonstration of being an imbecile who does not give a crap about the law and you support that.

I am pretty darn sure the President has give a large deal of importance to the Constitution, the law, and has done his best to follow it which I cannot say about his predecessor.
 
Back
Top Bottom