- Joined
- Sep 20, 2017
- Messages
- 3,099
- Reaction score
- 278
- Location
- Gold Coast, Australia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Only when I read your posts.
Shouldn't that be, "Only Rosie O'Donnell..."?
Only when I read your posts.
Shouldn't that be, "Only Rosie O'Donnell..."?
Or perhaps an investigation of Trump's taking over Poland in 1939 with his band of merry National Socialists.
He’s happy to answer Mueller’s fake interrogation but his lawyers won’t let him.
He won’t have a “side of the story” per se. He’ll just be a middle aged nervous Lefty with a dry mouth, constantly taking sips of water. If you want to see how his answers will look, hop aboard the Larrikin Time Machine, and I’ll take you there now:
I don’t recall, sir.
No, sir.
Not at all, sir.
I cannot recall, sir.
I don’t think so, sir.
Not really sir, I was not angry though.
No, definitely not.
Yes sir, overworked.
No, I was not angry. We were mostly just kidding.
I can’t remember the exact date, no.
Not hate, no. I just thought he was not the best choice.
No sir, I don’t remember.
No sir, it did not affect my work.
Yes, sir, I realize that.
No, that doesn’t ring a bell, sir.
No sir, it was not meant to be taken seriously. As I say, we were mostly just fooling around.
I can’t recall that, sir.
Yes sir, I realize now that it was irresponsible. At the time…
No sir, I don’t recall that.
Yes sir, I do.
No sir, I would not.
No I did not.
I realize that now sir.
No, I can’t recall that.
Perhaps I did, but I don’t remember.
I may have, yes, but not intentionally.
No sir, not with real malice.
I don’t recall, sir.
He’s happy to answer Mueller’s fake interrogation but his lawyers won’t let him.
They had to testify; Trump doesn’t. He could even sack Mueller if he wanted, but he’s letting him have his nothingburger witch-hunt since it will probably help Trump more than hurt him. Democrats don’t understand why, which is fine by him.
Fake News is especially cheap. Just make it up as you go along. Get your facts straight.
Trump said if he were in that same situation, he would have acted to try to save lives.
"You don't know until you're tested, but I really believe I'd run in there even if I didn't have a weapon. I think most of the people in this room would have done that too. The way they performed was really a disgrace."
President Trump blasted FBI agent Peter Strzok on Monday night, arguing that the hearing for the agent known for his anti-Trump text messages should be “shown to the public on live television.”
“The hearing of Peter Strzok and the other hating frauds at the FBI & DOJ should be shown to the public on live television, not a closed door hearing that nobody will see,” the president tweeted. “We should expose these people for what they are - there should be total transparency!”
Trump’s comments came just days before Strzok is set to testify before the House Judiciary Committee.
….
Justice Department Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz's report on the Clinton email investigation, released earlier this month, said Page texted Strzok in August 2016, prior to then-candidate Donald Trump's election night win, saying "[Trump's] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!"
"No. No he won't. We'll stop it," Strzok responded.
More…
Smell that? You smell that? Porterhouse Strzok, son. Nothing else in the world smells like that. I love the smell of barbequed Porterhouse Strzok in the morning. You know, one time we had the swamp bombed for 12 hours. When it was all over, I walked up. We didn't find one of 'em, not one stinkin' Trump hater. The smell, you know that barbeque smell, the whole hill. Smelled like… Victory. Someday this war's gonna end…"
President Trump blasted FBI agent Peter Strzok on Monday night, arguing that the hearing for the agent known for his anti-Trump text messages should be “shown to the public on live television.”
“The hearing of Peter Strzok and the other hating frauds at the FBI & DOJ should be shown to the public on live television, not a closed door hearing that nobody will see,” the president tweeted. “We should expose these people for what they are - there should be total transparency!”
Trump’s comments came just days before Strzok is set to testify before the House Judiciary Committee.
….
Justice Department Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz's report on the Clinton email investigation, released earlier this month, said Page texted Strzok in August 2016, prior to then-candidate Donald Trump's election night win, saying "[Trump's] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!"
"No. No he won't. We'll stop it," Strzok responded.
More…
Smell that? You smell that? Porterhouse Strzok, son. Nothing else in the world smells like that. I love the smell of barbequed Porterhouse Strzok in the morning. You know, one time we had the swamp bombed for 12 hours. When it was all over, I walked up. We didn't find one of 'em, not one stinkin' Trump hater. The smell, you know that barbeque smell, the whole hill. Smelled like… Victory. Someday this war's gonna end…"
In the right-side column of the forum home page: "Trump calls for live, televised..."
I'm just glad I didn't click on the thread and find "...executions".
Much like the IG report this will be another goose egg for the GOP drama queens.
He won’t have a “side of the story” per se. He’ll just be a middle aged nervous Lefty with a dry mouth, constantly taking sips of water. If you want to see how his answers will look, hop aboard the Larrikin Time Machine, and I’ll take you there now:
I don’t recall, sir.
No, sir.
Not at all, sir.
I cannot recall, sir.
I don’t think so, sir.
Not really sir, I was not angry though.
No, definitely not.
Yes sir, overworked.
No, I was not angry. We were mostly just kidding.
I can’t remember the exact date, no.
Not hate, no. I just thought he was not the best choice.
No sir, I don’t remember.
No sir, it did not affect my work.
Yes, sir, I realize that.
No, that doesn’t ring a bell, sir.
No sir, it was not meant to be taken seriously. As I say, we were mostly just fooling around.
I can’t recall that, sir.
Yes sir, I realize now that it was irresponsible. At the time…
No sir, I don’t recall that.
Yes sir, I do.
No sir, I would not.
No I did not.
I realize that now sir.
No, I can’t recall that.
Perhaps I did, but I don’t remember.
I may have, yes, but not intentionally.
No sir, not with real malice.
I don’t recall, sir.
He’s happy to answer Mueller’s fake interrogation but his lawyers won’t let him.
They had to testify; Trump doesn’t. He could even sack Mueller if he wanted, but he’s letting him have his nothingburger witch-hunt since it will probably help Trump more than hurt him. Democrats don’t understand why, which is fine by him.
Fake News is especially cheap. Just make it up as you go along. Get your facts straight.
Trump said if he were in that same situation, he would have acted to try to save lives.
"You don't know until you're tested, but I really believe I'd run in there even if I didn't have a weapon. I think most of the people in this room would have done that too. The way they performed was really a disgrace."
Since when does a lawyer control what Trump does?
Well, for a man who dishes out blizzards of lies daily, it's telling that you believe him.
next time, my dear, we will be sure that every employee of the Justice department is fully vetted as a card carrying republican. Then of course everything will be fair in your world.
Is this the kind of transparency where you make up a story about adoptions to cover your kid's ass?
I had a similar reaction.
He's going to run.
Lol.
Waddle maybe.
Plod.
Trudge.
Not run.
And he's lying through his teeth
Narcicists don't risk their anything for anybody.
Its known as Trump Derangement Syndrome, or Trumplexia. Don't worry - there's a cure for it:
Running.
https://youtu.be/dZh0o_MNBGI
Running
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9Q2ALLjpP0
Golf
https://youtu.be/Dqy9qVz1SsQ
But you can't show any examples.
What's a narcicist?
President Trump blasted FBI agent Peter Strzok on Monday night, arguing that the hearing for the agent known for his anti-Trump text messages should be “shown to the public on live television.”
“The hearing of Peter Strzok and the other hating frauds at the FBI & DOJ should be shown to the public on live television, not a closed door hearing that nobody will see,” the president tweeted. “We should expose these people for what they are - there should be total transparency!”
Trump’s comments came just days before Strzok is set to testify before the House Judiciary Committee.
….
Justice Department Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz's report on the Clinton email investigation, released earlier this month, said Page texted Strzok in August 2016, prior to then-candidate Donald Trump's election night win, saying "[Trump's] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!"
"No. No he won't. We'll stop it," Strzok responded.
More…
Smell that? You smell that? Porterhouse Strzok, son. Nothing else in the world smells like that. I love the smell of barbequed Porterhouse Strzok in the morning. You know, one time we had the swamp bombed for 12 hours. When it was all over, I walked up. We didn't find one of 'em, not one stinkin' Trump hater. The smell, you know that barbeque smell, the whole hill. Smelled like… Victory. Someday this war's gonna end…"
What is with all these pathetic nicknames??? Seriously... How does it feel being trolled constantly all day every day? Also the dude agreed to testify. I'm pretty sure he's got nothing to hide.
"Oh ****, what now?"
Don't even try to claim we haven't had a bunch of those.
So a video from decades ago, a reference to a "short jog followed by a fast walk", and golf.
That's your "refutation". Uhm-kay.
I refer you to the table of lies.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...FjAWegQIAxAB&usg=AOvVaw2Yanm2pPM2v9_75YHcJ_a-
Petty nonsense, but hey, what do we expect from him, right?
Aaaand, a spelling gig. If that is "winning!", can you see why we're unimpressed?
When a bunch of the best ones insist. They all know what he’s like and how he would happily take on anyone, from Kim Jon-un to Megyn Kelly, from MS-13 to Rosie O’Donnell, and in the case of Mueller they know it would be a mistake. Their reasoning would be, “It won’t gain you anything but it may cost you something. With stakes like those, who needs it?”
For a man who says Trump dishes out blizzards of lies daily, it’s telling that you can’t name one.
Are you that big of a bait, hook and sinker swallower? I guess you are. Well, here goes.....
"There is substantial evidence of voter fraud."
"We have signed more legislation than anybody. We broke the record of Harry Truman."
"Obama was born in Kenya".
"Mexico will pay for the wall"
"Crime in Germany is way up"
Much like the IG report this will be another goose egg for the GOP drama queens.