• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump calls for live, televised hearing of Strzok

Or perhaps an investigation of Trump's taking over Poland in 1939 with his band of merry National Socialists.

I'll pull a Trump and say that was his Dad's fault.
 
He’s happy to answer Mueller’s fake interrogation but his lawyers won’t let him.

Since when does a lawyer control what Trump does? Oh, on this one, they do, yeah, right.

Well, for a man who dishes out blizzards of lies daily, it's telling that you believe him.
 
He won’t have a “side of the story” per se. He’ll just be a middle aged nervous Lefty with a dry mouth, constantly taking sips of water. If you want to see how his answers will look, hop aboard the Larrikin Time Machine, and I’ll take you there now:

I don’t recall, sir.
No, sir.
Not at all, sir.
I cannot recall, sir.
I don’t think so, sir.
Not really sir, I was not angry though.
No, definitely not.
Yes sir, overworked.
No, I was not angry. We were mostly just kidding.
I can’t remember the exact date, no.
Not hate, no. I just thought he was not the best choice.
No sir, I don’t remember.
No sir, it did not affect my work.
Yes, sir, I realize that.
No, that doesn’t ring a bell, sir.
No sir, it was not meant to be taken seriously. As I say, we were mostly just fooling around.
I can’t recall that, sir.
Yes sir, I realize now that it was irresponsible. At the time…
No sir, I don’t recall that.
Yes sir, I do.
No sir, I would not.
No I did not.
I realize that now sir.
No, I can’t recall that.
Perhaps I did, but I don’t remember.
I may have, yes, but not intentionally.
No sir, not with real malice.
I don’t recall, sir.



He’s happy to answer Mueller’s fake interrogation but his lawyers won’t let him.



They had to testify; Trump doesn’t. He could even sack Mueller if he wanted, but he’s letting him have his nothingburger witch-hunt since it will probably help Trump more than hurt him. Democrats don’t understand why, which is fine by him.



Fake News is especially cheap. Just make it up as you go along. Get your facts straight.

Trump said if he were in that same situation, he would have acted to try to save lives.

"You don't know until you're tested, but I really believe I'd run in there even if I didn't have a weapon. I think most of the people in this room would have done that too. The way they performed was really a disgrace."

next time, my dear, we will be sure that every employee of the Justice department is fully vetted as a card carrying republican. Then of course everything will be fair in your world.
 
President Trump blasted FBI agent Peter Strzok on Monday night, arguing that the hearing for the agent known for his anti-Trump text messages should be “shown to the public on live television.”

“The hearing of Peter Strzok and the other hating frauds at the FBI & DOJ should be shown to the public on live television, not a closed door hearing that nobody will see,” the president tweeted. “We should expose these people for what they are - there should be total transparency!”
Trump’s comments came just days before Strzok is set to testify before the House Judiciary Committee.
….
Justice Department Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz's report on the Clinton email investigation, released earlier this month, said Page texted Strzok in August 2016, prior to then-candidate Donald Trump's election night win, saying "[Trump's] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!"
"No. No he won't. We'll stop it," Strzok responded.

More…​

Smell that? You smell that? Porterhouse Strzok, son. Nothing else in the world smells like that. I love the smell of barbequed Porterhouse Strzok in the morning. You know, one time we had the swamp bombed for 12 hours. When it was all over, I walked up. We didn't find one of 'em, not one stinkin' Trump hater. The smell, you know that barbeque smell, the whole hill. Smelled like… Victory. Someday this war's gonna end…"

I like it. Televise it and expose their bias to all the snowflakes.
 
President Trump blasted FBI agent Peter Strzok on Monday night, arguing that the hearing for the agent known for his anti-Trump text messages should be “shown to the public on live television.”

“The hearing of Peter Strzok and the other hating frauds at the FBI & DOJ should be shown to the public on live television, not a closed door hearing that nobody will see,” the president tweeted. “We should expose these people for what they are - there should be total transparency!”
Trump’s comments came just days before Strzok is set to testify before the House Judiciary Committee.
….
Justice Department Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz's report on the Clinton email investigation, released earlier this month, said Page texted Strzok in August 2016, prior to then-candidate Donald Trump's election night win, saying "[Trump's] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!"
"No. No he won't. We'll stop it," Strzok responded.

More…​

Smell that? You smell that? Porterhouse Strzok, son. Nothing else in the world smells like that. I love the smell of barbequed Porterhouse Strzok in the morning. You know, one time we had the swamp bombed for 12 hours. When it was all over, I walked up. We didn't find one of 'em, not one stinkin' Trump hater. The smell, you know that barbeque smell, the whole hill. Smelled like… Victory. Someday this war's gonna end…"

Is this the kind of transparency where you make up a story about adoptions to cover your kid's ass?
 
In the right-side column of the forum home page: "Trump calls for live, televised..."

I'm just glad I didn't click on the thread and find "...executions".

I had a similar reaction.
 
He won’t have a “side of the story” per se. He’ll just be a middle aged nervous Lefty with a dry mouth, constantly taking sips of water. If you want to see how his answers will look, hop aboard the Larrikin Time Machine, and I’ll take you there now:

I don’t recall, sir.
No, sir.
Not at all, sir.
I cannot recall, sir.
I don’t think so, sir.
Not really sir, I was not angry though.
No, definitely not.
Yes sir, overworked.
No, I was not angry. We were mostly just kidding.
I can’t remember the exact date, no.
Not hate, no. I just thought he was not the best choice.
No sir, I don’t remember.
No sir, it did not affect my work.
Yes, sir, I realize that.
No, that doesn’t ring a bell, sir.
No sir, it was not meant to be taken seriously. As I say, we were mostly just fooling around.
I can’t recall that, sir.
Yes sir, I realize now that it was irresponsible. At the time…
No sir, I don’t recall that.
Yes sir, I do.
No sir, I would not.
No I did not.
I realize that now sir.
No, I can’t recall that.
Perhaps I did, but I don’t remember.
I may have, yes, but not intentionally.
No sir, not with real malice.
I don’t recall, sir.



He’s happy to answer Mueller’s fake interrogation but his lawyers won’t let him.



They had to testify; Trump doesn’t. He could even sack Mueller if he wanted, but he’s letting him have his nothingburger witch-hunt since it will probably help Trump more than hurt him. Democrats don’t understand why, which is fine by him.



Fake News is especially cheap. Just make it up as you go along. Get your facts straight.

Trump said if he were in that same situation, he would have acted to try to save lives.

"You don't know until you're tested, but I really believe I'd run in there even if I didn't have a weapon. I think most of the people in this room would have done that too. The way they performed was really a disgrace."

He's going to run.

Lol.

Waddle maybe.

Plod.

Trudge.

Not run.

And he's lying through his teeth

Narcicists don't risk their anything for anybody.
 
Since when does a lawyer control what Trump does?

When a bunch of the best ones insist. They all know what he’s like and how he would happily take on anyone, from Kim Jon-un to Megyn Kelly, from MS-13 to Rosie O’Donnell, and in the case of Mueller they know it would be a mistake. Their reasoning would be, “It won’t gain you anything but it may cost you something. With stakes like those, who needs it?”

Well, for a man who dishes out blizzards of lies daily, it's telling that you believe him.

For a man who says Trump dishes out blizzards of lies daily, it’s telling that you can’t name one.
 
next time, my dear, we will be sure that every employee of the Justice department is fully vetted as a card carrying republican. Then of course everything will be fair in your world.

FBI people should be hired according to their ability as agents, not for their one-sided, bigoted, jaundiced, partisan political views.
 
Running.

https://youtu.be/dZh0o_MNBGI

Running

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9Q2ALLjpP0

Golf

https://youtu.be/Dqy9qVz1SsQ




But you can't show any examples.



What's a narcicist?

So a video from decades ago, a reference to a "short jog followed by a fast walk", and golf.

That's your "refutation". Uhm-kay.

I refer you to the table of lies.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...FjAWegQIAxAB&usg=AOvVaw2Yanm2pPM2v9_75YHcJ_a-

Petty nonsense, but hey, what do we expect from him, right?

Aaaand, a spelling gig.

If that is "winning!", can you see why we're unimpressed?
 
Lol. I like your style, dude.


President Trump blasted FBI agent Peter Strzok on Monday night, arguing that the hearing for the agent known for his anti-Trump text messages should be “shown to the public on live television.”

“The hearing of Peter Strzok and the other hating frauds at the FBI & DOJ should be shown to the public on live television, not a closed door hearing that nobody will see,” the president tweeted. “We should expose these people for what they are - there should be total transparency!”
Trump’s comments came just days before Strzok is set to testify before the House Judiciary Committee.
….
Justice Department Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz's report on the Clinton email investigation, released earlier this month, said Page texted Strzok in August 2016, prior to then-candidate Donald Trump's election night win, saying "[Trump's] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!"
"No. No he won't. We'll stop it," Strzok responded.

More…​

Smell that? You smell that? Porterhouse Strzok, son. Nothing else in the world smells like that. I love the smell of barbequed Porterhouse Strzok in the morning. You know, one time we had the swamp bombed for 12 hours. When it was all over, I walked up. We didn't find one of 'em, not one stinkin' Trump hater. The smell, you know that barbeque smell, the whole hill. Smelled like… Victory. Someday this war's gonna end…"
 
I'm guessing Trump knows something we all don't and wants it run up the flag pole. I agree with his sentiment. Expose the stain to sunlight. Let it burn.



What is with all these pathetic nicknames??? Seriously... How does it feel being trolled constantly all day every day? Also the dude agreed to testify. I'm pretty sure he's got nothing to hide.
 
So a video from decades ago, a reference to a "short jog followed by a fast walk", and golf.

He ran and then walked to the police and that was recent.

That's your "refutation". Uhm-kay.

I'll bet he did more running than you in his life. Let’s see how much running or golf you do at 72.


You said Trump was “lying through his teeth” and I pointed out that you could not show any examples. So instead of showing an example you pointed me at a website that rambled on about some of his products and ex businesses.

Try again. What lie did he tell?

Petty nonsense, but hey, what do we expect from him, right?

I expect he will continue to be honest as he has been from the start.

Aaaand, a spelling gig. If that is "winning!", can you see why we're unimpressed?

What’s ‘aaaand’?
 
When a bunch of the best ones insist. They all know what he’s like and how he would happily take on anyone, from Kim Jon-un to Megyn Kelly, from MS-13 to Rosie O’Donnell, and in the case of Mueller they know it would be a mistake. Their reasoning would be, “It won’t gain you anything but it may cost you something. With stakes like those, who needs it?”



For a man who says Trump dishes out blizzards of lies daily, it’s telling that you can’t name one.

Are you that big of a bait, hook and sinker swallower? I guess you are. Well, here goes.....

"There is substantial evidence of voter fraud."

"We have signed more legislation than anybody. We broke the record of Harry Truman." (he ranks last, actually)

"Obama was born in Kenya".

"Mexico will pay for the wall"

"Crime in Germany is way up"

"Nancy Pelosi came out in favor of MS-13."

"We got $6 billion for opioid and getting rid of that scourge that’s taking over our country. And the numbers are way down."

A "Dems created a horrible law that requires that children be separated from their parents once they cross the Border into the U.S."

"James Clapper said that the FBI was spying on my campaign."

"A catch and release immigration policy is a Democrat rule."

"In seven years that (nuclear) deal will have expired, and Iran is free to go ahead and create nuclear weapons."

'North Korea has "agreed to denuclearization."

"Democrats are nowhere to be found on DACA."

"You take Pulse nightclub. If you had one person in that room that could carry a gun and knew how to use it, it wouldn’t have happened, or certainly to the extent that it did." (There was an armed gaurd present)

The immigration visa lottery "randomly hands out green cards without any regard for skill, merit, or the safety of American people."

"We enacted the biggest tax cuts and reforms in American history."

"We essentially repealed Obamacare because we got rid of the individual mandate ... and that was a primary source of funding of Obamacare." (both are wrong)


Oh, I would continue, but there is a 5000 character limit. WaPo has a nice inventory of them, over 3000.

Politifact gave him "Lie Of The Year" award.
 
Are you that big of a bait, hook and sinker swallower? I guess you are. Well, here goes.....

When you say ‘here goes’ what you mean is, “Here goes very little,” because you provided no links. The words provided below come straight off your head and are all wrong. You expect me to search for all these terms, find the correct quotes, correct you and provide the links. No thanks. I’ll deal with the first few, and if you want me to look at the rest you may provide the real quote, word for word, and the link that backs it up. I will then address each.

"There is substantial evidence of voter fraud."

Misquote. Fake News. Trump said this:

"Despite substantial evidence of voter fraud, many states have refused to provide the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity with basic information relevant to its inquiry. Rather than engage in endless legal battles at taxpayer expense, today I signed an executive order to dissolve the Commission, and have asked the Department of Homeland Security to review these issues and determine next courses of action."​

Where is the lie? There is plenty of voter fraud, and you can see the detail here.

His (and millions of others) believing what the linked article says, does not equal “a lie”.

"We have signed more legislation than anybody. We broke the record of Harry Truman."

Misquote. Fake News. Trump said this:

“We had a lot of legislation pass. They were saying that if we got this one done, we would have succeeded with legislation. But I believe we have – and you’ll have to ask those folks, but I think they know the real answer… we have more legislation passed, including the record – was Harry Truman. That’s a long time ago. And we broke that record. So we have a lot done.”​

Where’s the lie? He said he believed it, and that you’d need to ask those folks. Believing something and asking you to check it, is not lying, which is why most of the media didn’t call it lying. He thought his 94 bills were the greatest number - it turned out it was Truman with his 126 bills. Whoopee do. Trump was 71.5 years old, and it was 2 days after Christmas day. Instead of shrieking “LIAR!” the Left should flay themselves with whips for being so desperate for something to whine about – and to keep whining about - like a broken diff. Pathetic!

"Obama was born in Kenya".

Misquote. Fake News. It was Obama’s literary agent who said he was born in Kenya, as you can see on Snopes.

Trump said this:

In debate, @MittRomney should ask Obama why autobiography states "born in Kenya, raised in Indonesia."​

"Mexico will pay for the wall"

Mexico will pay for the wall. Trump always said it would pay at a later stage, but would pay. Meanwhile, if the Left succeed in stopping him taxing Mexico to pay for the wall, it is still not a lie since he meant it. If you say, “We will go to the beach tomorrow,” and have every intention of going to the beach, and a storm blows up and stops you, you are not “a liar”. If someone thinks that comprises a lie they should go back and study the English language again.

"Crime in Germany is way up"

Crime in Germany is way up. Trump explained that the German Left winged government under communist Merkel is not interested in publishing the real figures and is covering them up. You don’t think the commander-in-chief of the United States Armed Forces would know if Merkel was covering up such things? Until you have the United States intelligence machine don’t dare say your commander-in-chief is lying about such matters.

The rest of your list is no doubt as incorrect as the first five, and I’m happy to answer them providing you provide accurate quotes and links, and not made up Fake News.
 
Many of us have wanted live televised hearings of anything that had to do with the Russian investigations and have been sorely disappointed by the lack of them.

So now Trump wants to cherry pick because he suspects the proceedings will favor him.

Welcome to the new America of Trump and the castrated Congress.
 
Much like the IG report this will be another goose egg for the GOP drama queens.

Imagine the shock as Americans find out the dirty secret that members of the FBI have a right to have political opinions!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Can the nation last when shaken to its foundations by such startling revelations?!???!!
 
Back
Top Bottom