• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump attends slain NYPD officer Jonathan Diller's wake: 'Need law and order'

How many times do you need to try to move the field goal using whatever piece of conspiracy theory trash you find on FoxNews?

Everything you’ve tried so far has been a failure. It’s actually been a spectacular failure.
Not really. I watch hearings. You don't.
 
Trump HAS to fundraise at every opportunity:

1) He needs, desperately, to be the center of attention, to be the one who deserves the attention

2) He needs, desperately, to con his cult into sending him money to pay his legal bills
 
Why didn’t Trump attend funerals for the 888 officers that died while he was POTUS?
Why the sudden interest in “showing respect” to fallen officers?
Why didn't Trump attend funerals for the 888 officers who died while he was POTUS???
-Peace

The second year it was over 300 deaths were under tRump...
The first and only year it was over 400 deaths were under tRump...

 
Last edited:
No, I'm not lying. The lie is you denying I posted a link about a funeral turning into a Democrat pep rally.
Your link didn't show "a funeral turning into a Democrat [sic] pep rally".
 
Democrat Presidents raising money while President Trump honors fallen police officer. The American people are watching. The police told democrats to stay away.
Oh please ... where is my violin? Come on, you are smarter than to think this is Trump sincerely paying his respects. The man has no sincerity and respects nothing but himself (and that guy in Russia). There is nothing uglier than disingenuous posts. Please elevate your game.
 
@Jessie C said:
I watch hearings, and you are lying.

`````````````
Either @Uriah is outright lying when he makes this claim, or he's not disclosing that he refuses to believe what he hears at the hearings, to wit, he denies the reality of Jan 6 presented by Liz Cheney.
 
Surprised he has any time left outside the court house these days.

Pshaw, there's always time to beg for votes and a little campaign $. So sorry for your loss, Mrs. uh...Mrs. uh...travesties like these must STOP! We need law and order! Now face the camera...that's good...okay, fellas, get her outta here, she's getting my good suit all wet. (starts tapping away furiously on TS)
 
That's the goal, keep him in court so he can't campaign.
Ah, so you're implying trump was forced to exploit the funeral for the slain police officer in order to make up for lost campaigning time....
 
Post #197.
Doesn't corroborate your claim.

Of course, you could copy and paste the excerpts you believe substantiate your claim that a funeral was turned by Democrats into a pep rally....
 
That's the goal, keep him in court so he can't campaign.
WRONG! He's spent very little time in court, he's more concerned about cheating on his golf course aginst the poor unfortunate souls who play against him!
 
Trump hasn't been accepting bribes from China.
Do remember Trump's controversial lifting of the sanctions on the Chinese telecom giant ZTE as a personal favor to President Xi?
Trump’s motivation to help ZTE do business in the U.S. has long been a controversial topic in U.S. national security circles. Trump trade adviser Peter Navarro raised eyebrows in June of 2018 when he told Fox News, “It’s going to be three strikes you’re out on ZTE. If they do one more additional thing, they will be shut down. We have a bad actor in ZTE…President (Donald Trump) did this as a personal favor to the president of China as a way of showing some goodwill.”

Furthermore, following the May 2018 announcement by Trump that he would lift sanctions on ZTE, China announced a $500 million loan to help fund a theme park in Indonesia with a Trump-branded hotel and golf course attached.

“The Chinese government is extending a $500 million loan to a state-owned construction company to build an Indonesian theme park that will feature a Trump-branded golf course and hotels,” read the lead of a National Review article from May 2018.

Later that same month, speculation abounded that Trump’s sanctions relief was related to his daughter Ivanka Trump seeking trademarks in China. New York Times ran an article titled, “Ivanka Trump Wins China Trademarks, Then Her Father Vows to Save ZTE.” While the Times makes clear the connection between Ivanka’s trademarks and ZTE is “probably” a coincidence, the article argues “the remarkable timing is raising familiar questions about the Trump family’s businesses and its patriarch’s status as commander in chief.”
 
Since when does Trump care about or follow laws?
 
Do remember Trump's controversial lifting of the sanctions on the Chinese telecom giant ZTE as a personal favor to President Xi?
Trump’s motivation to help ZTE do business in the U.S. has long been a controversial topic in U.S. national security circles. Trump trade adviser Peter Navarro raised eyebrows in June of 2018 when he told Fox News, “It’s going to be three strikes you’re out on ZTE. If they do one more additional thing, they will be shut down. We have a bad actor in ZTE…President (Donald Trump) did this as a personal favor to the president of China as a way of showing some goodwill.”

Furthermore, following the May 2018 announcement by Trump that he would lift sanctions on ZTE, China announced a $500 million loan to help fund a theme park in Indonesia with a Trump-branded hotel and golf course attached.

“The Chinese government is extending a $500 million loan to a state-owned construction company to build an Indonesian theme park that will feature a Trump-branded golf course and hotels,” read the lead of a National Review article from May 2018.

Later that same month, speculation abounded that Trump’s sanctions relief was related to his daughter Ivanka Trump seeking trademarks in China. New York Times ran an article titled, “Ivanka Trump Wins China Trademarks, Then Her Father Vows to Save ZTE.” While the Times makes clear the connection between Ivanka’s trademarks and ZTE is “probably” a coincidence, the article argues “the remarkable timing is raising familiar questions about the Trump family’s businesses and its patriarch’s status as commander in chief.”
Good catch! Thanks for reminding us it looks as if the POTUS used the office of the Presidency to reward China for a gift made to his daughter....

trump really is a sleazebag
 
Back
Top Bottom