- Joined
- Jun 20, 2008
- Messages
- 111,874
- Reaction score
- 109,296
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Well this should be interesting. I don't know if there's a precedent for a President-elect going on trial immediately after the election. Republicans and the media made so much of Clinton going into the White House with her alleged crimes dragging behind her that not much attention was paid to Trump's own legal problems dealing with when he conned students out of hundreds of thousands of dollars.
I agree with the lawyer. It makes much more sense to delay the trial until his Presidency when, you know, his schedule won't be so hectic.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...1c109e-a784-11e6-ba59-a7d93165c6d4_story.html
SAN DIEGO — Attorneys for President-elect Donald Trump went to court Thursday to ask that a civil fraud suit against Trump scheduled to begin in less than three weeks be delayed, a reminder of the unusual complications facing Trump as he shifts from businessman to commander in chief.
Trump’s attorneys said he will be too busy with the presidential transition to participate in the Nov. 28 trial involving his defunct real estate seminar program, Trump University. They asked that the trial be postponed until February or March, after he has taken office.
They made their request before Judge Gonzalo Curiel, the jurist Trump harshly criticized during the campaign as biased because of his Mexican heritage.
Curiel expressed concern about the wisdom of a delay given that Trump will assume the presidency Jan. 20. Curiel said he will probably issue a ruling by Monday.
I agree with the lawyer. It makes much more sense to delay the trial until his Presidency when, you know, his schedule won't be so hectic.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...1c109e-a784-11e6-ba59-a7d93165c6d4_story.html