• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trump’s Antisocial State

j brown's body

"A Soros-backed animal"
DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 18, 2018
Messages
81,160
Reaction score
86,051
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Progressive
For all its nihilism, Project 2025 is much more than a guidebook to government demolition. It is just as concerned with reconstructing the state as deconstructing it: in its pages, we find the outlines of a far-right theory of state power in which the most “paleo” forms of personal, autocratic rule rise from the scorched earth of economic libertarianism. Trumpism would revolutionize the world in order to reinvent the most archaic social structures, a lost world of racial, sexual, and class subordination. Like every project of revolutionary conservatism, it needs a new constitution and a new epistemology. Constitutional interpretation is brushed aside in favor of outright fabulation. Experimental knowledge is treated as an existential threat to power, to be replaced wherever possible by theocratic dogma and presidential edict (witness Trump’s extraordinary attack on the life sciences).

Just as surely as it wants to incapacitate the redistributive and social protective arms of the state, Project 2025 wants to exploit its vast bureaucratic powers to silence, threaten, and deport. And it intends to consolidate these powers under the personal authority of the president. The report recommends the suppression of abortion drugs and the decriminalization of protests outside abortion clinics. It calls for the militarization of the border and a dramatic expansion of migrant detention centers. It demands that ICE be allowed to use “expedited removal” against undocumented migrants throughout the country. With the arrest and attempted deportation of Columbia University student and green card holder Mahmoud Khalil, we have confirmation that Trump is prepared to go much further.

Trump’s attack on the federal security complex is the most chilling sign yet of his authoritarian intent. By purging the Pentagon and FBI of its senior officials and replacing them with concentric circles of loyalists, Trump is seeking to take personal charge of the state’s monopoly on violence, leaving him free to unleash its fire power on anyone he singles out. In short, he is attempting to build something we can genuinely call a deep state—a windowless echo chamber, as desolate as a Mar-a-Lago bathroom strewn with classified documents and inhabited by a lunatic.

...The late Keynesian social state, with all its contradictions, has been replaced by the neoliberal antisocial state—a state that has downsized its redistributive functions, converted much of its welfare arm into punitive and carceral functions, privatized or outsourced as many of its services as possible, and multiplied its guarantees to private operators. This is a state form that abandons the low- and non-waged to self-care yet still includes them within its nets as permanent debtors and generators of income such as toll fees, rents, utility bills, and interest on student debt. In its most inclusive “third way” form, the neoliberal state creates “social markets” as a substitute for social insurance: that is, instead of underwriting and equalizing the risks borne by everyday citizens, it incentivizes private insurers or asset managers to operate these services at a profit.

Link

Excellent analysis on where's we're headed.



 
After reading this twice now, having difficulty understanding where the Constitution is relevant to Cooper's partisan tirade.

. . . Constitutional interpretation is brushed aside in favor of outright fabulation . . .

WTF?? LOL

Specifically which part of the Constitution is in question? It appears that the author (Melinda Cooper) desperately needed to rationalize her TDS, and foolishly invoked the Constitution in order to do it.

Libertarians radicalize the antisocial proclivities of the neoliberal state. They are determined to destroy not just the last vestiges of New Deal social welfare,
News flash: there's nothing in the Constitution regarding "New Deal social welfare".

Trump is now threatening to abandon Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act, along with all its private sector contractors.

LOL. The Inflation Reduction Act has nothing whatsoever to do with reducing inflation. It's a dopey Ponzi scheme designed to transfer wealth from the Taxpayers to "green" Corporations chosen by Biden.

Melinda Cooper's tirade is classic neo-Marxist nonsense.
 
After reading this twice now, having difficulty understanding where the Constitution is relevant to Cooper's partisan tirade.



WTF?? LOL

Specifically which part of the Constitution is in question? It appears that the author (Melinda Cooper) desperately needed to rationalize her TDS, and foolishly invoked the Constitution in order to do it.


News flash: there's nothing in the Constitution regarding "New Deal social welfare".



LOL. The Inflation Reduction Act has nothing whatsoever to do with reducing inflation. It's a dopey Ponzi scheme designed to transfer wealth from the Taxpayers to "green" Corporations chosen by Biden.

Melinda Cooper's tirade is classic neo-Marxist nonsense.
Classic neo-Marxist?
I call bullshit.
 
Trump’s attack on the federal security complex is the most chilling sign yet of his authoritarian intent. By purging the Pentagon and FBI of its senior officials and replacing them with concentric circles of loyalists, Trump is seeking to take personal charge of the state’s monopoly on violence, leaving him free to unleash its fire power on anyone he singles out. In short, he is attempting to build something we can genuinely call a deep state—a windowless echo chamber, as desolate as a Mar-a-Lago bathroom strewn with classified documents and inhabited by a lunatic.

Link

He did the same thing almost immediately with the military. And people argue/d with me when I say/said he will just decide to ignore the law when he feels like it. He's immune from prosecution for any acts performed in the commission of his office...including illegal and/or unconstitutional ones.

And he has engineered it so that there will be plenty of "force" to carry out those acts if there's any resistance.
 
It's almost as though the Confederacy won the Civil War: college and public health are out catching undocumented immigrants is like going after runaway slaves.
 
What impresses me the most about Trump's vision for our future is its utter lack of common decency.

Trump treats everyone like a contestant on the apprentice.
Treating people like shit is standard practice and decency is for losers.
Being polite is a weakness and paying on time is for suckers.

All that matters is being the biggest asshole in the room at all times.
 
Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution states: "The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America." What this means is the President has complete power over the Executive Branch of the government and this includes all Departments and Agencies that fall under the executive branch. If the President wants to gut the FBI or any other agency he/she his has the constitutional authority to do so, is it a smart thing to do, maybe not. Executive Orders issued by the President only applies to the Executive Branch and it's Department and Agencies. The President has no power over the Legislative branch, Judicial Branch or the States. If the Congress wants to do something about about the Powers delegated to the President they have the ability to do so. Nowhere in the Constitution does it grant anyone the ability to work for the federal government, so if the President wants to cut and slash jobs in the executive branch, so be it. In my opinion, it high time that someone takes a demolition ball to the BLOATED federal government, when the federal government become the largest employer in the country something is wrong.
 
Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution states: "The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America." What this means is the President has complete power over the Executive Branch of the government and this includes all Departments and Agencies that fall under the executive branch. If the President wants to gut the FBI or any other agency he/she his has the constitutional authority to do so, is it a smart thing to do, maybe not. Executive Orders issued by the President only applies to the Executive Branch and it's Department and Agencies. The President has no power over the Legislative branch, Judicial Branch or the States. If the Congress wants to do something about about the Powers delegated to the President they have the ability to do so. Nowhere in the Constitution does it grant anyone the ability to work for the federal government, so if the President wants to cut and slash jobs in the executive branch, so be it. In my opinion, it high time that someone takes a demolition ball to the BLOATED federal government, when the federal government become the largest employer in the country something is wrong.
You might try reading the ENTIRE Constitution we both took an oath to support and defend.
Congress has passed laws and Presidents have signed off on how career civil servants can be fired. Long before tRump, presidents would wholesale fire and replace competent administrators with political lackeys. Congress decides what is spent and where- the President doesn't get to torch programs in a lame ass attempt to 'pay for' continuing tax cuts for billionaires.
You seem like many tRumpers- really don't understand the budgets being wrecked. Salaries are a nit in each agency. I say again- a nit. Programs cut hurt the citizens who pay the taxes. I have a friend- 2 tour Afghan MP, 100% disabled and now has lost her shrink due to Bone Spur Convict waving his little hands.
Given all the government does- from billion-dollar carriers to school lunches it is very easy to see Uncle Sugar is the largest employer.
So, my fellow 'Flower-Power' veteran you are very ill informed.... Scouts Out! ✌️
 
Trump treats everyone like a contestant on the apprentice.
Treating people like shit is standard practice and decency is for losers.
Being polite is a weakness and paying on time is for suckers.

All that matters is being the biggest asshole in the room at all times.

And what's remarkable is that the people Trump drops like a hot brick the moment they're no longer useful, don't seem able to see it
Ask Mike Lindell.
 

Just another Pinhead Ponzi Scheme we have going on in the 2025 years of hell to the America we all Love.
Tons of Billionaire Lubo airs out there now. The most all so scre'd too. Used to call Arss lickers, boot lickers, POC !
Ladies, there isn't any actual money anywhere. So Ponzi schemes are a galore.
 
Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution states: "The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America." What this means is the President has complete power over the Executive Branch of the government and this includes all Departments and Agencies that fall under the executive branch. If the President wants to gut the FBI or any other agency he/she his has the constitutional authority to do so, is it a smart thing to do, maybe not. Executive Orders issued by the President only applies to the Executive Branch and it's Department and Agencies. The President has no power over the Legislative branch, Judicial Branch or the States. If the Congress wants to do something about about the Powers delegated to the President they have the ability to do so. Nowhere in the Constitution does it grant anyone the ability to work for the federal government, so if the President wants to cut and slash jobs in the executive branch, so be it. In my opinion, it high time that someone takes a demolition ball to the BLOATED federal government, when the federal government become the largest employer in the country something is wrong.

Not sure what this has to do with the topic.
 
I love when Trump apologists and fascismistas flaunt their ignorance of the Constitution, ignoring the parts that refute their positions thoroughly. (Not really. I hate it.) They misinterpret the words plainly written and right in front of them to promote nonsense reading, then make up other nonsense to fill in all the holes in their reasoning.

Let us, rather, concentrate on two obvious points. Article I, Section 1 (the part that comes first for a reason),
Section. 1.
All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.
Congress creates the laws. The authority for creation of those laws rests not with the Executive, but the Congress.

And second, the Executive's responsibility is to follow those laws "he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed", Article II, Section 3.

The President cannot, willy-nilly, ignore those laws, flout them and make up his own. Not in the Constitution, period. He cannot misappropriate funds, impound them, or use them for purposes that Congress did not appropriate them for. "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law" Article I, Section 9.

When Congress creates a Department, directs its purpose, and funds it, he cannot ignore these instructions, change their purpose, or eliminate their functions. "The Congress shall have Power ..." Article I, Section 8 - not "the President" - "To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."

The Executive power is rather limited and circumscribed by Congress' prerogatives.

I know, "minor details." They just happen to be the details that refute all of this nonsense.
 
Trump thinks how they act on the Apprentice is how all companies do hiring so it's no wonder he thinks social norms are for losers.
 
You might try reading the ENTIRE Constitution we both took an oath to support and defend.
It might also behoove him to read the entire article that informs the OP and the thread. It's almost as if he's discussing what's in his own head, rather than anything that is written down on paper or produced with pixels.
 
More from the OP article.
"The long right-wing attack on the administrative state has always relied on a widely shared indifference to the fine points of public spending. The attack could be pursued as long as people were convinced that “their” taxes were being protected from government spending on underserving others. As countless studies have shown, lower- and middle-income Republican voters live in a state of cognitive dissonance: they see their own Social Security, Medicaid, and veterans’ benefits as earned income, apparently unaware that any significant cut to the federal budget would have to target these budgetary items in particular. In this regard, Musk’s willingness to raid the Social Security Administration barely a month into Trump’s presidency suggests a distinct lack of tactical foresight. The project may backfire by making things too personal too fast for too many people, including the average Trump voter.

“Bargaining for the common good” describes a strategy in which workers connect their immediate wage demands to the larger distributional issues of state spending and taxation. This strategy has met with notable success in the public sector union movement and at the level of state government. It has yet to be extended to the private sector, where the illusion of corporate independence from the state still prevails, or indeed to the federal public sector. Any scale-up to this level remains extremely challenging. Ironically, however, Musk has performed a useful service in bringing these various work sites under the same organizational umbrella.

It is obvious, for instance, that the kind of slash-and-burn tactics currently being deployed against federal workers are identical to those experienced by Silicon Valley tech workers over the last few years of mass layoffs. But beyond this, what are Tesla or X employees today if not federal workers? What are X users if not customers of a public infrastructure—the propaganda arm of the patrimonial state? When the company executive controls the levers of the Treasury, it is hard to maintain the pretense that the tech sector in any way represents the fount of private initiative, independent of government. Inadvertently, Musk has done more to highlight the commonalities between private and public sector workers than any labor organizer in recent history. It remains to be seen how these opportunities might be exploited by an incipient big tech and federal worker union movement.

One important implication of the bargaining for the common good framework is that distributional struggle can arise from any facet of our daily lives in which government spending decisions play a critical role. For the past several decades, fiscal and monetary policy has sought to inflate property prices and suppress wages. The pressures have become acute since the coronavirus pandemic, as renters bear the brunt of distressed mortgages and rising interest rates. Housing tenure is increasingly salient as a factor in class stratification: wage demands mean nothing if they don’t also account for the growing portion of wages handed over to landlords. For this reason, the tenant unions that have mushroomed across the country in the last few years can be seen as a logical extension of the resurgent union movement.
The point of the Trump regime's process is to ignore and attack "the common good." Indeed, the public interest is anathema to the narrow, parochial interests it intends to serve - cronies, campaign donors, contractors, private capital interests and corporate overlords (not shareholders). It is, inherently, based upon Corruption with a capital "C".

This is a class war in the classic sense, and we, the people are its target. The attack on the government institutions is directed at weakening government protections of the populace - health, economic, educational and recreational institutions that we depend on for our very survival. Look where cuts are taking place, and who the primary targets are: Overseers Inspectors General; legal infrastructure, the DoJ, particularly Civil Rights division; top lawyers (private and public); Educational institutions and the entire Department; and anything that has "aid" in its mandate - Legal Aid, Medicaid, USAID - or specifically incorporated to "protect" (CFPB) or "secure" the public's interest (Social Security, SEC, Federal Reserve).

The Trump regime is bent on "execution" in a different meaning than "faithfully execute" - to destroy, rather than fulfill, the mission of serving the public. All of its participants are antithetical to the agencies they've been appointed to dismantle.
 
Trump thinks how they act on the Apprentice is how all companies do hiring so it's no wonder he thinks social norms are for losers.

No, Trump has developed fantasies on how he should conduct himself, based on a game show.
 
Back
Top Bottom