- Joined
- Jun 18, 2018
- Messages
- 82,802
- Reaction score
- 88,006
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Anyone specific? Anything specific?
Let them win. Problem solved!
Anyone specific? Anything specific?
She remains an important political figure among Democrats. But if you want only to count those who today hold elected or appointed office, you can count Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, John Kerry, Jerry Nadler, Sheila Jackson, Nancy Pelosi, Bernie Sanders, Sherrod Brown, and Corey Booker who are all on record making election denial claims as part of their political speechmaking.
(I'd count you too, but I don't think you hold any such office.)
That’s not going to happen.Interesting. I wonder what the Dems who are so confident of a fair election will say if GOP tsunami occurs.![]()
No, rank political bias.Apples and oranges.
Democrats called into question specific issues that they felt unfairly affected the elections.
Republicans have no evidence of fraud but are responding to a narcissistic demagogue who intellectually knows he lost but is psychologically incapable of accepting defeat.
Nice try on the whataboutism, but there's quite a difference.
We know them by their fruits.Anyone specific? Anything specific?
No, rank political bias.
But hey, you're not objective when it comes to politically motivated violence, so why should I expect you to be so when it comes to election result denial?
She will change her mind if Reps win.Denise Paolucci is correct.
“Flood the zone with shit…” Mr. Bannon approves of your posts. Thank you for your service.No, rank political bias.
But hey, you're not objective when it comes to politically motivated violence, so why should I expect you to be so when it comes to election result denial?
No, I've proven senior Democratic leaders regularly engage in election denial. That you make excuses for it is proof you're hopelessly partisan.Again, you are uncapable of addressing arguments and reduced to ad hominem attacks.
Very weak and disappointing.
Stupid post. I'm not a Trump supporter, and that video is a set of facts you cannot bullshit away.“Flood the zone with shit…” Mr. Bannon approves of your posts. Thank you for your service.
Bannon is not primarily a Trump supporter either. He wants to tear down the US government and start over. Trump was just a convenient mouthpiece.Stupid post. I'm not a Trump supporter, and that video is a set of facts you cannot bullshit away.
I don't think so. I think she'll be on the look out coming to the 2024 election.She will change her mind if Reps win.
I don't think so. I think she'll be on the look out coming to the 2024 election.
No, I've proven senior Democratic leaders regularly engage in election denial. That you make excuses for it is proof you're hopelessly partisan.
And while you're argument is certainly weak, I can't say it's disappointing. More like expected.
Bannon is not primarily a Trump supporter either. He wants to tear down the US government and start over. Trump was just a convenient mouthpiece.
There is no comparison, and you embarrass and discredit yourself to attempt it.No, rank political bias.
But hey, you're not objective when it comes to politically motivated violence, so why should I expect you to be so when it comes to election result denial?
Gibberish.Context eludes you. Or you elude it.
Half of it is, while not really gibberish, it was more generous than necessary. The “context eludes you” part. The truth is you elude it.Gibberish.
If Kari Lake wins, it will be "the voice of the people"Of course, and if they win that, the election will be fine.
Don't you get it?
Is anyone surprised by this?
Republicans, brainwashed by a 76 yr old obese man who paints his face orange.
This dingbat sums up the dopes who swallow everything Fox News and AM Radio tosses out there:
"I'm concerned, I'm very concerned," about the vote count, said Denise Paolucci, 62, a registered nurse from Raveena, Ohio, who was among those surveyed. A Republican, she voted for Trump in 2020. "It's just these Democrats are so crooked."
MSN
www.msn.com
Do you understand what a secret ballot is?I received my Oregon Election Ballot this week. The ballot itself does not have ANY of my personal info on it. Essentially, it's a ballot that cannot be traced back to me.
I don't like it at all. Essentially, a box of ballots could be filled out and submitted, and there would be NO WAY to verify if those ballots are legitimate.
Democrats want this, Republicans do not. The question is, Why?
Clearly not.Do you understand what a secret ballot is?
Do you understand what a secret ballot is?
So nice to be chatting with arbiters of "The Truth."Half of it is, while not really gibberish, it was more generous than necessary. The “context eludes you” part. The truth is you elude it.
Republicans, brainwashed by a 76 yr old obese man who paints his face orange.