• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Trial by jury

mikhail

blond bombshell
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 14, 2005
Messages
4,728
Reaction score
763
Location
uk
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
I cant help but think if i had commited or been accused of commiting a crime if i was innocent id want one judge if i was guilty i would want a jury.

Discuss.
 
I cant help but think if i had commited or been accused of commiting a crime if i was innocent id want one judge if i was guilty i would want a jury.

Discuss.
You probably got that backwards. Judges don't like to go against the police and district attorney, particularly elected judges. But a judge is more likely to go along with typical sentencing, which is usually lower than by a jury.
 
I would say that juries are more swayed by emotional appeal, while judges are more likely to favor a textbook interpretation of the law. Depending on your circumstances, the choice may vary. Also, with a jury trial your lawyer can pull tricks to get a jury favorable to you, while you can't really pick your judge.
 
Assuming you have the money, you want a jury unless it's a particularly distasteful offense.
 
I would want a jury trial in any case.
 
Especially since we have too many lawyers, I think we should require that every jury have a judge and defense attorney (one with no ties to the defendant's attorney) on it, so that fallacious appeals to emotion are more easily neutered.
 
You probably got that backwards. Judges don't like to go against the police and district attorney, particularly elected judges. But a judge is more likely to go along with typical sentencing, which is usually lower than by a jury.

You have this part backwards when it comes to my specific county.

Although we have managed to elect some better judges. We have also elected a few people who don't know their ass from a whole in the ground, and have to step down from the bench to "recess" to look up laws on some of the most ridiculous things.
 
I would say that juries are more swayed by emotional appeal, while judges are more likely to favor a textbook interpretation of the law. Depending on your circumstances, the choice may vary. Also, with a jury trial your lawyer can pull tricks to get a jury favorable to you, while you can't really pick your judge.

Also not always true.

Ive had defense attorneys continue cases until a judge they wanted rotated into my district level courtroom that week.

Most of the time they still lose... :)


But then again, all my comments mean nothing since I don't arrest people who are innocent (Although many claim to be).
 
Back
Top Bottom