• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Treasury: 292 Tea-Party Groups Targeted…6 Progressive Groups

Wehrwolfen

Banned
Joined
May 11, 2013
Messages
2,329
Reaction score
402
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Conservative
By Curt
06-27-13


Let's see. Six progressive groups were flagged for extra scrutiny by the IRS, while out of 292 tea party groups that applied for special tax-exempt status ALL 292 groups were flagged.

Naw....nothing to see here. Move along.

Inspector General Russell George:

“Our audit did not find evidence that the IRS used the ‘progressives’ identifier as selection criteria for potential political cases between May 2010 and May 2012,” George wrote in the letter obtained by The Hill.
The inspector general also stressed that 100 percent of the groups with “Tea Party,” “patriots” and “9/12” in their name were flagged for extra attention.

“While we have multiple sources of information corroborating the use of Tea Party and other related criteria we described in our report, including employee interviews, e-mails and other documents, we found no indication in any of these other materials that ‘progressives’ was a term used to refer cases for scrutiny for political campaign intervention,” George wrote to Levin, the top Democrat on the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee…​

George’s letter says that the “progressive” identifier on BOLO lists was not in a section used for selecting potential political cases, and that the IRS had developed inappropriate criteria to flag Tea Party applicants as potentially political.​

So why was the new IRS director, and special Obama buddy, Danny Werfel, out and about trying to spread misinformation?

Why, because that's what the Obama administration does best.

(Excerpt)

Read more:
Treasury: 292 Tea-Party Groups Targeted…6 Progressive Groups | Flopping Aces

Of course as we can see that of all the hundreds of Progressive groups granted 501(c)(3) or (4) status only 6 were flagged. thus proving the process was not only biased but additionally pointed at conservative and religious groups.
 

Josie

No Day But Today
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 25, 2010
Messages
38,600
Reaction score
20,642
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Libertarian - Right
I remember when Glenn Beck was planning his Restoring Honor event and he kept talking about all the hoops he had to jump through. Enough water bottles to accommodate all the attendees, enough porta-potties, security, money, money, money, permits, paperwork, paperwork, paperwork....

And then the Occupy Wall Street people get to plant their asses wherever they want for however long they want, pooping and sleeping wherever they want? How is that fair?
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom