- Joined
- Nov 8, 2010
- Messages
- 3,747
- Reaction score
- 1,260
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
ABC News has re-digitized video of George Zimmerman taken shortly after Trayvon Martin's shooting.
The video was unveiled as an exclusive this morning on "Good Morning America." ABC was the first news organization to show the original tape.
Reporter Matt Gutman said the clearer video shows "what appear to be a pair of gashes or welts on George Zimmerman's head."
Neighborhood Watch volunteer Zimmerman has said he shot 17-year-old Trayvon in self-defense. The video shows Zimmerman arriving at the Sanford Police Department within an hour after the shooting.
Gutman said the video had been "clarified" by Forensic Protection Inc. Former FBI Special Agent Brad Garrett told ABC that the clearer video shows "marks on the back of Mr. Zimmerman's head."
Trayvon Martin: ABC enhances George Zimmerman video - Orlando Sentinel
Here is a photo from ABC
View attachment 67125266
And another article where the new ABC report video can be found:
ABC NEWS: Enhanced Zimmerman Video Shows Injury to Head
Point being, the original article last week, and all the uninformed crap in a thread about it, was just that. Nonense.
And now we will hear, "Well, it doesn't make any difference anyway."
I'm glad to see that some of the media has taken a bit of interest in Zimmerman's side of the story.
Duke Lacrosse part deux.
We all want justice.
The media is NOT qualified to present evidence in a fair in reasonable manner. The voice print analysis, this "enhanced" video and the original video are no substitute for a court of law. Zimmerman's guilt or innocence needs to determined by trial.
The media is NOT qualified to present evidence in a fair in reasonable manner. The voice print analysis, this "enhanced" video and the original video are no substitute for a court of law. Zimmerman's guilt or innocence needs to determined by trial.
Would it be "racist" to ask whether Martin was trying to rob the place Zimmerman was protecting?
Those look like injuries and if they are, his story about his injuries checks out although medical reports would be better. This doesn't change much.Here is a photo from ABC
View attachment 67125266
And another article where the new ABC report video can be found:
ABC NEWS: Enhanced Zimmerman Video Shows Injury to Head
Point being, the original article last week, and all the uninformed crap in a thread about it, was just that. Nonense.
. Zimmerman's guilt or innocence needs to determined by trial.
It depends on why you're asking the question, but given your post history:Would it be "racist" to ask whether Martin was trying to rob the place Zimmerman was protecting?
Efforts to better this race are like forcing a coach to spend all his time training the boys who didn't make the team. The key point in this analogy that everyone is overlooking is that we are neglecting those with talent. We only have so much money to go around and must spend it where it will eventually pay off, not waste it on evolution's losers. Blacks themselves are dependent on America concentrating solely on tested superiority, the pre-Civil Rights development of which is the only reason they have always been better off than their cousins left in Africa. Unfair means they fare better.
Hey Maggie. I haven't been posting much, as I have had a squabble or two with the Mods. I live about 90 miles from Sanford, so I get plenty on this story, although its been mainstream everywhere.
We all want justice. What we have gotten though is BS. Not from law enforcement, but from the scum liberal media, and most of the black community.
ABC ran the original bogus and incorrect analysis last week, with only a grainy and edited video. NBC deliberately edited the 911 Zimmerman call. These were not accidents. These were not basic and prudent editing of media for time. It was all bull**** so as to hype this as a racial incident, where racism provoked the death of a 17 year old. Not a concerned citizen who was attacked. And not stupidity by an over-anxious Community Watch wannabee. Racism what done it, because that best fed the political frenzy that some hoped for and needed.
Duke Lacrosse part deux.
OK...I'll say it. It doesnt MATTER. I dont disbelieve that he was getting his ass kicked. Thats an unfortunate bi-product when you stalk a man by car and on foot, against the direct guidance of a police dispatcher. See...if you are that person being stalked...you dont know what is up...you know some strange asshole is following you and that is NEVER good. There isnt a soul here that can honestly say that if they were in the 17 year olds position they wouldnt have reacted in SOME way. MANY here would react in the SAME way. Feel threatened...respond. I dont think for a second Zimmerman set out to murder the kid. I absolutely believe he is responsible, even criminally, for killing the kid.And now we will hear, "Well, it doesn't make any difference anyway."
I'm glad to see that some of the media has taken a bit of interest in Zimmerman's side of the story.
No, but it would be uninformed. Zimmerman wasn't protecting "a place."
OK...I'll say it. It doesnt MATTER. I dont disbelieve that he was getting his ass kicked. Thats an unfortunate bi-product when you stalk a man by car and on foot, against the direct guidance of a police dispatcher. See...if you are that person being stalked...you dont know what is up...you know some strange asshole is following you and that is NEVER good. There isnt a soul here that can honestly say that if they were in the 17 year olds position they wouldnt have reacted in SOME way. MANY here would react in the SAME way. Feel threatened...respond. I dont think for a second Zimmerman set out to murder the kid. I absolutely believe he is responsible, even criminally, for killing the kid.
Well, Zimmerman's argument is not simply that Trayvon attacked him, but that Zimmerman stopped following Trayvon and then Trayvon followed Zimmerman and attacked him - meaning that Trayvon was the one who provoked confrontation.There seems to be a lot of focus on whether Trayvon attacked Zimmerman or not. I have to say, I think that is completely besides the point. Trayvon was being chased down the street by a guy with a gun after doing nothing except going to the store to buy some skittles. Let's say Trayvon attacked Zimmerman in self-defense, and Zimmerman retaliated by shooting him. Doesn't exactly absolve Zimmerman of guilt. Zimmerman initiated the incident, against the advice of professionals. Even he admits that.
You should not be allowed to inject yourself into a situation, harass someone to the point where they lash out violently, and then kill them in "self-defense." Neither should stand-your-ground apply here. As Jeb Bush said: stand your ground means stand your ground. It doesn't mean inject yourself into a situation and instigate a violent encounter. If anything, stand your ground applied to Trayvon, and look what it did for him...
Martin was a 17 year old, fueled by a dangerous combination of fear, adrenaline, and teen aged stupidity. Zimmerman is an adult, assumed to be in an authoritative role, who was carrying a firearm. He created the situation and is responsible for a dead kid.So you extremely support "stand your ground" in that you think that it what Martin did in relation to a sense of danger?
OK...I'll say it. It doesnt MATTER. I dont disbelieve that he was getting his ass kicked. Thats an unfortunate bi-product when you stalk a man by car and on foot, against the direct guidance of a police dispatcher. criminally
Curious. You are 90 miles away and saw nothing, but assert as fact that it was because of racism and by a Community Watch wannabe. In fact he was in his Neighborhood Watch and you don't know whether it was racism or not.
There seems to be a lot of focus on whether Trayvon attacked Zimmerman or not. I have to say, I think that is completely besides the point. Trayvon was being chased down the street by a guy with a gun after doing nothing except going to the store to buy some skittles. Let's say Trayvon attacked Zimmerman in self-defense, and Zimmerman retaliated by shooting him. Doesn't exactly absolve Zimmerman of guilt. Zimmerman initiated the incident, against the advice of professionals. Even he admits that.
You should not be allowed to inject yourself into a situation, harass someone to the point where they lash out violently, and then kill them in "self-defense." Neither should stand-your-ground apply here. As Jeb Bush said: stand your ground means stand your ground. It doesn't mean chase after someone you haven't witnessed breaking any law and instigate a violent encounter. If anything, stand your ground applied to Trayvon, and look what it did for him...
Hey Maggie. I haven't been posting much, as I have had a squabble or two with the Mods. I live about 90 miles from Sanford, so I get plenty on this story, although its been mainstream everywhere.
We all want justice. What we have gotten though is BS. Not from law enforcement, but from the scum liberal media, and most of the black community.
ABC ran the original bogus and incorrect analysis last week, with only a grainy and edited video. NBC deliberately edited the 911 Zimmerman call. These were not accidents. These were not basic and prudent editing of media for time. It was all bull**** so as to hype this as a racial incident, where racism provoked the death of a 17 year old. Not a concerned citizen who was attacked. And not stupidity by an over-anxious Community Watch wannabee. Racism what done it, because that best fed the political frenzy that some hoped for and needed.
Duke Lacrosse part deux.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?