• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

TOUGH QUESTIONS

Daisy said:
Do you think it is?
Click to expand...

I'm not a Christian. You think it's not though, and you say false doctrines that don't have a basis in scripture make a religion satanic. So you believe that Rev and Tosca follow religions that were created by Satan, yes?

Do you have the honesty to stand by your own statements or will you continue to dance around?
 
Questerr said:
I'm not a Christian. You think it's not though, and you say false doctrines that don't have a basis in scripture make a religion satanic. So you believe that Rev and Tosca follow religions that were created by Satan, yes?

Do you have the honesty to stand by your own statements or will you continue to dance around?
Click to expand...
So...you have no opinion one way or the other...translation...you've got no horse in this race...got it...
 
Daisy said:
So...you have no opinion one way or the other...translation...you've got no horse in this race...got it...
Click to expand...

And you don't have the honesty to stand by your own words. You throw statements out there but dance around when actually pressed on what they mean.
 
Questerr said:
And you don't have the honesty to stand by your own words. You throw statements out there but dance around when actually pressed on what they mean.
Click to expand...
Anyone who knows me here, knows where I stand regrading the trinity doctrine...you OTOH continue to avoid admitting where you stand...
 
Daisy said:
Anyone who knows me here, knows where I stand regrading the trinity doctrine...you OTOH continue to avoid admitting where you stand...
Click to expand...

So you believe that Tosca and Rev follow religions created by Satan, yes?

I'm going to go with the interpretations of the vast majority of Biblical scholars including non-Christian scholars and not with a tiny cult that lies about child rape.
 
Questerr said:
So you believe that Tosca and Rev follow religions created by Satan, yes?

I'm going to go with the interpretations of the vast majority of Biblical scholars including non-Christian scholars and not with a tiny cult that lies about child rape.
Click to expand...
IOW, you have no stance but take other people's word for it...got it...
 
Questerr said:
Or its extremely unlikely that millions of experts are wrong while a tiny cult that is known for lying is correct.
Click to expand...
Uh huh...Matthew 7:13,14...
 
Questerr said:
We're talking about the veracity of the group that says they have the truth. That group lied in order to cover up child rapes.
Click to expand...
No, we are talking about the trinity...
 
Questerr said:
You are claiming the group that have the correct interpretation of the Trinity is a group that lied to cover up child rape. How do you know they aren't lying about the Trinity?
Click to expand...
There are scriptures to support both, that's why...I follow scripture, not people...
 
Daisy said:
There are scriptures to support both, that's why...I follow scripture, not people...
Click to expand...

Scriptures support lying to cover up child rape?

Can't scriptures be twisted to say anything one wants them to?
 
Questerr said:
Scriptures support lying to cover up child rape?
Click to expand...
No, supporting of accusing anyone of doing anything wrong without solid proof...

Questerr said:
Can't scriptures be twisted to say anything one wants them to?
Click to expand...
Sure, when you cherry pick...I don't...I consider all scriptures on any given subject before making a decision on what is right in God's eyes...
 
Daisy said:
No, supporting of accusing anyone of doing anything wrong without solid proof...


Sure, when you cherry pick...I don't...I consider all scriptures on any given subject before making a decision on what is right in God's eyes...
Click to expand...

And the Jehovah's Witnesses, which you are a member of and ascribe to the theology of, admitted IN COURT UNDER OATH that they lied to cover up child rapes. What Scripture was on their side?
 
Questerr said:
And the Jehovah's Witnesses, which you are a member of and ascribe to the theology of, admitted IN COURT UNDER OATH that they lied to cover up child rapes. What Scripture was on their side?
Click to expand...
They also claim babies are little enemies of god. Yes, seriously.
 
Variant said:
I'm explaining what "falsifiable" means. It means it needs to be able to be observed to be false.

The process of falsification is done via observation.





The process of falsification requires that we be able to observe the result.

We don't need to observe it, we need to be able to make the observation.

We would have to be able to make an observation that the proposed hypothesis is false.

Further, the universe and intelligent life are the circumstance that you are trying to explain with God.

So, since your claim is that "God created the universe and intelligent life", you would need some falsifiable observation that would be predicted outside of the circumstance you are trying to explain.

Also the falsifiable claim you make should generally point to the truth of the hypothesis and not ALSO to the truth of it's contradiction. "The universe exists" doesn't differentiate between God and not God.



"Nature did it" isn't an explanation either, and as you may have noticed, I haven't made such a claim.



"Nothing existed" isn't a necessary claim for Atheists.

There doesn't need to be anything other than God for God to exist though, so the lack of a universe doesn't falsify God.

Nothing can ever falsify God, it's not an idea that is specific enough that it requires any particular observation.



You can ask whatever questions you like.

Some are more meaningful than others.



The alternative "explanation" is about as rigorous as saying: "magic stuff happened" which we also find quite unconvincing.

So, we can go about our business actually trying to understand the universe rather than trying to impress upon it our own pet ideas.
Click to expand...

This guy is good.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom