KidRocks
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2005
- Messages
- 1,337
- Reaction score
- 16
- Location
- right here
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Until you do, consider yourself caught in another lie. Or are you admitting to making up your little fact, Jack?Here's your link... .l.
LOL... just kidding!![]()
Prove this to be true.while most of the dying in Vietnam were blacks, and Hispanics. That's a fact Jack.
are you admitting to making up your little fact, Jack?
Prove this to be true.
Show us the casualty statictics.
I'll bet that >85% of those killed where Caucassians.
For whatever reason, you seem to think that the only way to increase the size of the military is to have a draft.
Why do you think this?
A) The military itself is against the draft.
B) The draft will insure that anti-war folks will be serving leading to a military with low morale not to mention soldiers who are more suited to working at burger king or not working at all than to be responsible for million dollar pieces of equipment.
C) A professional volunteer military is simply better than a draft military consisting of un-professional conscripted soldiers.
D) Thomas Jefferson didn't serve in the revolution, Benedict Arnold did, who was the greater Patriot?
No, I just don't have no stinking link, don't you believe me? Google it yourself if you don't believe me.
Here, I'll get you started... google, let's see, Vietnam, group racials of deaths, student deferments, proper proportions of minorities killed in Vietnam in relation to the whole.
Try one of those and see what pops up.
For Christs sake, do I have supervise your every move?![]()
Here is your link dumbazz! maybe you should look around before you run your mouth..
Research - Statistical information about casualties of the Vietnam conflict
CACCF Record Counts by Race (as of 12/98)
Racial category titles are those used in the documentation created at the genesis of the file, ca. 1967
Race Number of Records
American Indian 226
Caucasian 50,120
Malayan 252
Mongolian 116
Negro 7,264
Unknown, Not Reported 215
Total 58,193
In this case, where we need hundreds of thousands of more troops quickly, a draft is the only way. There are not hundreds of thousands of volunteers just standing by who can't get in. The US Army can't even meet its recruting goals.
That's the most assinine link I've ever seen, are Hispanics considered Caucasians now?
President Bush got one and so did many, in fact, millions of Republican kids got out of serving in Vietnam or the draft because of student deferments, or so I hear. Most deferments were 'white' well to do kids while most of the dying in Vietnam were blacks, and Hispanics. That's a fact Jack.
That's the most assinine link I've ever seen, are Hispanics considered Caucasians now?
That's the most assinine link I've ever seen, are Hispanics considered Caucasians now?
Here's how the game works, kidrocks. You make an assertion, then it's your responsibility to provide the data....not mine.No, I just don't have no stinking link, don't you believe me? Google it yourself if you don't believe me.
Here, I'll get you started... google, let's see, Vietnam, group racials of deaths, student deferments, proper proportions of minorities killed in Vietnam in relation to the whole.
Try one of those and see what pops up.
For Christs sake, do I have supervise your every move?![]()
This is either a lie, or you not knowing any better. They have made their goals regularly for some time now.
In 1991 the military was twice the size it is now, across a smaller population base. Why can't we double the size of the military w/o a draft?
Good -- that means you can find it and post it.There was an article on CNN a few week ago that the Army missed their recruiting goals for a third months in a row.
Associated Press | September 22, 2006
WASHINGTON - The Army is ending its best recruiting year since 1997 and expecting similar success in 2007, despite the weight of grim war news from Iraq, Army Secretary Francis Harvey said.
How did we get there without a draft?The military in 1991 already existed at that size,
Good -- that means you can find it and post it.
Army Meets Yearly Recruiting Goal
How did we get there without a draft?
A lie requires an intent to decieve. For instance, claiming to know someone was lying when you didn't know...The kid won't be back to this thread. Once proven a liar, he always disappears.![]()
Wow this is funny.First off Charles Rangel is not to bright there.He isan't going to bring back the draft.............................................And here is Rangel saying that he wants to bring back the draft but also wants to pull out of Iraq.Smart hypocrtical idea.He'll bash the president but then defend him like it's his brother when Chavez verbally assualted Bush.He's just another hyprocritical Dem. that's too old to be in Congress and unfortunately he has to be from my state.
Goobieman proved him a liar (again) in post 33. That's why the kidrock is gone!A lie requires an intent to decieve. For instance, claiming to know someone was lying when you didn't know...
Rangel is a race baiter and a bigot. This is just another move to turn the public against the war.
The majority of people are against the war now... which is credited with the Democratic victory in the recent election.
I don't think Rangel thinks he is turning anybody against the war, those that still support it by now, probably always will.