A) I'm not a liberalThat's why you don't let liberals watch your back...They'll more than likely let you die.
He would, so long as he could blame "liberals" for it. After all, that's all some people care about.Would you send 3 guys to die for no reason?
Aw, quit whining....Your lean is clear, as is your putrid level of posting...Back to DU with you.A) I'm not a liberal
B) It doesn't take a genius to understand the difference between regular Army and covert agents.
C) Your blanket accusation of "liberals" shows a level of partisanship which makes it very clear you don't give a rat's rear end about the truth or common sense or logic, you just want to play team politics.
He would, so long as he could blame "liberals" for it. After all, that's all some people care about.
My "lean" is towards the truth. It's a shame more people seem to care about playing team politics than they do the truth.Aw, quit whining....Your lean is clear, as is your putrid level of posting...Back to DU with you.
My "lean" is towards the truth. It's a shame more people seem to care about playing team politics than they do the truth.
Would you send 3 guys to die for no reason?
As I noted in my post that you responded to (quoted above), I did not dispute the veracity of Steven's diary entry about security concerns, which -- in case you misunderstood -- means that I did not dispute that there could be a lack of security.
So I'm puzzled why you chose to repeat that lack-of-security point instead of addressing the counterpoint that I also noted in my post about Steven's refusing additional security. What do you think about that refusal? Since the blame game seems to be in play here by the right, wouldn't it seem that he put his own life at risk?
How many bad guys were there? (Fox news info is fine here)
Can you rationally answer a question?
Maybe when you stop with the foolishness, and warrant something more than shocked mockery....I mean really, you think that the Marines care by how much they are out numbered by? What kind of Marine were you?
Would you send 3 guys to die for no reason?
It would have just been 3 more dead guys. The RW is really shameful, using the deaths of Americans for political gain, and trying to bash Obama becaue there werent mroe deaths. What are we 2 years out? and still no evidence of wrongdoing.
If 3 guys jad the balls and the will to risk theor lives to save their comrades, would you let them?
The sad part is if those guys HAD gone in, then these same posters would be criticizing Obama for their deaths.Not unless it could accomplish something. Would you let your guys die for no reason. This wasnt a John Wayne movie. These guys were a few of the very few armed assets you had in the region. Think man. I cant remember which forum I was on wehn I was talking abou this but saturday night a guy I know who is very Fox right wing type and I and another guy were discussing this. HE was an infantry officer and a chopper piolt later in VN. he did several tours. I asked him if he had a few guys at an outpost surrounded by 50-70 bad guys with all sorts of small arms up to rocket launchers etc and his only assets were 3 guys with small arms, would he send them? He immediately said no. You guys are acting like this was a movie or something. It wasnt.
The sad part is if those guys HAD gone in, then these same posters would be criticizing Obama for their deaths.
Partisanship can be disgusting.
Yes, she absolutely said that, and to that Issa immediately said he didn't believe that for a moment...
I also believe that was a bit of CYA on her part....For instance why no increased security? Was it lack of funding? We already know that from her own lips she said 'No Sir', well, then was it a spontaneous attack? We also know the answer to that is no. In fact we know that after previous attacks on other embassy's and consulates in the area that Stevens begged for more security and was turned down by State because they wanted to optics to show "normalized relations".... It was a dumb plan, and it got people killed. Period.
Not unless it could accomplish something. Would you let your guys die for no reason. This wasnt a John Wayne movie. These guys were a few of the very few armed assets you had in the region. Think man. I cant remember which forum I was on wehn I was talking abou this but saturday night a guy I know who is very Fox right wing type and I and another guy were discussing this. HE was an infantry officer and a chopper piolt later in VN. he did several tours. I asked him if he had a few guys at an outpost surrounded by 50-70 bad guys with all sorts of small arms up to rocket launchers etc and his only assets were 3 guys with small arms, would he send them? He immediately said no. You guys are acting like this was a movie or something. It wasnt.
I wouldn't sit back and do nothing. If they wanyed to go, I would go with them.
Would you send 3 guys to die for no reason?
I wouldn't sit back and do nothing. If they wanyed to go, I would go with them.
You talking about the movie causing the riot? There were riots in other areas of the regions reportedly casused by that. Why is that so important? Lying is always wrong, not just when Obama does it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?