• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Top 3% of U.S. Taxpayers Paid Majority of Income Taxes in 2016 (1 Viewer)

iguanaman said:
And the less they pay their employees the more money they can sock away for themselves.
Click to expand...
Uh, it's a business not a welfare office. As the economy grows wages follow. Just saw a stat from BLS saying more people were quitting jobs because there are more jobs with better wages available.


iguanaman said:
That is the problem. It is strangling our GDP and our middle class that makes them so rich.
Click to expand...
GDP seems to be doing pretty well lately. What makes any business rich is sales, period. As long as you offer goods and service people want at affordable prices you will prosper.

iguanaman said:
It is unsustainable. We cannot have one class of people with skyrocketing income while the rest stagnate. It is a path to disaster.
Click to expand...
Nonsense.
 

I don't see a problem with it.

Each bracket is inclusive of the others. The top one percent pays ballpark 37% of the taxes, and the top 0.1% pays about 18%. This means that the >0.1% to 1% pays about 19% of the taxes. (37 - 18)
 
MTAtech said:
I understand the talking point -- that only the rich pay taxes. Well, it's not truthful. While the working poor pay no taxes -- as by design thanks to Ronald Reagan, the middle-class, do in fact, pay a lot of taxes.
Click to expand...
Reagan? Really? A lot of water has passed under the bridge since then.[/quote]And yeah, I realize people pay other taxes but this discussion is about INCOME TAXES.
MTAtech said:
President Obama was able to cut taxes on the middle class without cutting taxes on the rich.
Click to expand...
And gave us massive debt in the process. And those "cuts"? A one-time check, a small tax credit, and a temporary reduction in FICA? BFD. Lot of good it did.
 
Last edited:

1929 called and they want their meme back. That is the last time income inequality was this high.



Real wages have not grown since the 1970's so I guess you think we have not had any economic growth since then?
 
Last edited:

Redistribution of income is idiotic and outrageous unless you actually want the middle class and the country to benefit. I've already addressed this viewpoint in this post. Redistribution has unmistakenly aided most Americans. But what you are doing is sticking to ideology -- an ideology that objects to taxing society’s winners to pay for a social safety net for needy Americans.
 
iguanaman said:
1929 called and they want their meme back. That is the last time income inequality was this high.

Click to expand...
Right, just like back then? :roll:
iguanaman said:
Real wages have not grown since the 1970's so I guess you think we have not had any economic growth since then?
Click to expand...
You'd guess wrong - not an unusual occurrence.
 
Bullseye said:
Right, just like back then? :roll:
You'd guess wrong - not an unusual occurrence.
Click to expand...

LOL It is not a "guess" it is reality.

https://www.epi.org/publication/charting-wage-stagnation/

 
Bullseye said:
I think the charts above show the percentage paid vs income is far more lopsided than that.
Click to expand...

Again, its only income tax. Also the charts conservatives often use underestimate income inequality by using income data that factors in the income impact of government programs while factoring out taxes, when it should completely factor out taxes and their effects when talking about tax impacts on pre-tax income.
 
I personally don't care who it is that wants to redistribute income. It's not their damned income and they have no right to think they can. Incidentally, that's what is wrong with all liberals, you included: they think they know better than I what I should do with my money.
MTAtech said:
That's essentially right and the reason income inequality is lower in European democracies, where it is harder for the super-rich get to interfere with the people's desire to support redistribution of income.
Click to expand...
 
Income tax IS THE TOPIC. Sorry you don't like the standard charts most economists use.
 
Bullseye said:
Income tax IS THE TOPIC. Sorry you don't like the standard charts most economists use.
Click to expand...

Whether or not all taxes target the rich unfairly is a lot more important than just one little tax. Individual taxes of course will be unfair to one group or another, but we need to see the impact of all taxes. That is my response to the claim that income taxes are unfair to the rich.
 
First off, grasp that I am in NO WAY saying income taxes are UNFAIR to the rich, I'm saying the progressive natural of our system works well; I'm arguing against that premise that somehow the system is slanted to favor the rich.


When all federal taxes are included the results don't vary much from a comparison of only income taxes; higher income percentiles still pay a much higher effective tax rate than lower ones.
 

Taxation has been a part of any/all developed, largely free nations. The idea that it's bad, or related in some distinct way to "liberals", is as ignorant as it gets. Educate yourself, because the overseas people
And yes, you have no idea how best to use that money to continue enabling our government to function.
 
Well, that's as stupid a thing that I have heard from a liberal. Apparently, you think I'm against taxation. What is wrong is the liberal idea that they can merely raise the taxes on the citizens who earned it, merely to redistribute the wealth. Maybe you missed where I said "I personally don't care who it is that wants to redistribute income. It's not their damned income and they have no right to think they can."
 
Deleted.
 

Attachments

  • EffectiveTaxRatesPNG.png
    14.8 KB · Views: 42
  • FF447_2.jpg
    23.2 KB · Views: 42
  • FF447_3_0.jpg
    20.4 KB · Views: 42
Bullseye said:
Sorry, I don't buy into opinion articles from far left think tanks.
Click to expand...

You "buy" data from the US bureau of labor statistics? That's your problem then. You can't handle the truth.
 

No, I don't follow men's confused interpretations of Scripture. I follow God's revelation and God opposes sodomy.
 

So your belief is that CEO's have gotten 300% smarter than the CEO's of the 1960's and so deserve 300% more? The system IS slanted to enable the few to amass huge fortunes while leaving the rest of us with stagnant or dropping wages. The data does not lie.

 
marke said:
No, I don't follow men's confused interpretations of Scripture. I follow God's revelation and God opposes sodomy.
Click to expand...

So God speaks to you personally....my mistake. :lol:
 
Your attempt at clarification doesn't save your failed argument.

Both parties routinely support progressive taxation, as do all western styled democracies of significant size. The least progressive are often found in highly socialized parts of Europe that tax *everyone* very highly, but in contrast, they distribute incomes far more equally.

Your ideas about what you think you oppose, are too absurd to even seriously think you mean it.
 
First, since you think it's your money being redistributed, I must congratulate you for being a member of the top income group -- for that is the group which money is being taxes. If you made it into this elite group, you have a lot of income. Oh, you're not in this group? Then you are among the beneficiaries of redistributive programs.

Second, if you believe "it's not 'their' damned income and they have no right to think they can," your complaint isn't with liberals, it is with the writers of the Constitution and the 16th Amendment who gave Congress the right to lay and collect taxes on income. So, they [Congress] really DO have the right to tax your income, regardless of what you imagine.

Now that the fantasy that "they" don't have the right to tax you is put to the side, the idea of whether it is a good idea is all that is left. We redistribute, and we’ve been doing it on a substantial scale for generations. Medicare, for example, is in effect a strongly redistributive program: it’s supported by a payroll tax (and other revenue) in which the amount you pay in depends on your income, but it supplies a benefit that depends only on your medical costs. From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs!

So no, liberals aren't radical for suggesting that our country should continue to do what we’re already doing for a very long time; the real radicals are the people on the right who want to declare much of what our government has been doing these past four generations illegitimate.
 
Last edited:
Reading your post something dawned on me.

The problem with the h1 and h2s is the same problem with illegals. They drive wages down by creating a labor surplus in the market.

If we have a labor shortage I see no problem with bringing in guest workers to fill that gap. The thing that needs to be safeguarded is that guest workers are not used to keep wages artifically low.

The problem in driving down wages is you drive away the most talented in the gene pool. Why become a genetics expert when you can make more and work less being the guy who writes tides new lady formula so they can market their product as new and improved.

It's an interesting enigma

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I467 using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…