Tom Homan was investigated for accepting $50,000 from undercover FBI agents. Trump's DOJ shut it down.

[Mycroft]

Biden knew Trump was going to win so he made up a story about Homan? You okay?

Biden didn't know anything. Hell, he didn't even know what day of the week it was at any given time.

But his pukes and their associates and supporters prepared well in advance for a possible Trump win and it wasn't even a secret. They prepared months before the election to flood the Trump administration with lawsuit after lawsuit and they TOLD people that's what they were doing.

Here is what Copilot says about it...

did people who were opposed to trump plan in advance of the 2024 election to bring lawsuits against a possible trump administration​

​

Yes, there’s evidence that some groups opposed to Donald Trump planned legal strategies well in advance of the 2024 election, anticipating potential challenges if he returned to office.​

​

Pre-Election Legal Preparations​

• According to reporting from USA Today, organizations like United Sovereign Americans began filing lawsuits before Election Day 2024, aiming to challenge voter roll practices in battleground states. Their stated goal was to block certification of results unless certain demands were met.
• ABC News revealed that both Democratic and Republican teams ramped up litigation efforts ahead of the election. Democrats, in particular, focused on countering what they described as “baseless Republican lawsuits,” with Vice President Kamala Harris’s legal team preparing to intervene aggressively.
• The Associated Press noted that Democrats built a legal infrastructure with hundreds of lawyers and staffers to respond to GOP lawsuits, many of which were filed before ballots were even cast.

Why This Matters ​

These legal maneuvers weren’t just reactive—they were strategic. The anticipation of post-election disputes, especially given Trump’s history of contesting results, led both sides to prepare for courtroom battles. While Republicans focused on “election integrity,” Democrats framed their efforts as “voter protection.”​

​

So yes, there was a coordinated legal push from Trump opponents, not necessarily to sue a future administration directly, but to preemptively challenge election-related issues that could affect the outcome or legitimacy of a Trump victory.​

I hear Biden also controlled Trump's FBI. Are you one of those too?

No.

 

[Allan]

Hookers and blow……

So it's an economic stimulus stimulant fund then.

But seriously wtf FBI - it's cash. Search the house, look in his bank account.

 

[Mycroft]

There's more...

besides election related lawsuits, what were they planning to do


Great question — and yes, opponents of Donald Trump were preparing for much more than just election-related lawsuits. Their broader strategy involved a multi-pronged legal and political resistance aimed at countering anticipated policies and executive actions if Trump returned to office.

Legal Resistance InfrastructureAccording to Politico, Democratic governors, attorneys general, and advocacy groups began “Trump-proofing” state programs months before the 2024 election. This included:

• Beefing up legal teams to challenge federal overreach
• Shielding state-level civil rights protections, environmental regulations, and reproductive health policies from federal rollback

Issue-Based LawsuitsGroups like the ACLU and other civil liberties organizations laid out plans to:

• Challenge immigration policies, especially mass deportations and third-country transfers that could violate international law3
• Defend reproductive rights, anticipating federal attempts to restrict abortion access
• Protect LGBTQ+ rights, particularly against potential rollbacks of trans protections
• Fight environmental deregulation, especially if Trump pursued aggressive fossil fuel expansion or weakened climate rules

Strategic Litigation & Advocacy

• The ACLU described its approach as a “battle-tested playbook” involving strategic litigation, public advocacy, and grassroots organizing to counter what it called “anti-liberty” policies
• Trial lawyers were reportedly preparing lawsuits to block Trump’s executive orders on financial reforms, such as expanding access to private equity in retirement plans — arguing these could violate fiduciary standards

Political Messaging & Legislative Shields

• Governors like Gavin Newsom and JB Pritzker used their platforms to rally public opposition and call special legislative sessions to protect state laws from federal interference
• Some states began passing laws that would make it harder for federal agencies to override local protections — essentially creating legal firewalls

In short, the resistance wasn’t just reactive — it was proactive, coordinated, and deeply embedded in legal, legislative, and public advocacy channels.​

 

[VySky]

Tom Homan was investigated for accepting $50,000 from undercover FBI agents. Trump's DOJ shut it down.

The FBI and Justice officials closed the investigation, which a Justice Department appointee had called a “deep state” probe in early 2025.

www.msnbc.com

--

In an undercover operation last year, the FBI recorded Tom Homan, now the White House border czar, accepting $50,000 in cash after indicating he could help the agents — who were posing as business executives — win government contracts in a second Trump administration, according to multiple people familiar with the probe and internal documents reviewed by MSNBC.

The FBI and the Justice Department planned to wait to see whether Homan would deliver on his alleged promise once he became the nation’s top immigration official. But the case indefinitely stalled soon after Donald Trump became president again in January, according to six sources familiar with the matter. In recent weeks, Trump appointees officially closed the investigation, after FBI Director Kash Patel requested a status update on the case, two of the people said.

--

Outrageous.

Fake news.

 

[Fearandloathing]

The Deep State is alive and well...and, I'm sure, under threat from the DOJ/FBI officials...especially since they are passing documents to the media.

We may never hear about it, but I wouldn't be surprised if people get fired.

In any case, this is a nothingburger. All you Trump haters...enjoy.

Aren't you bored with you yet?

Get a new act. This one is at least three decades old and we're all tried of the SOS!!!

"Nothing burger" is two words and was invented by the left in defense of your sworn enemy, Barrack Obama!

You're either a closet democrat or a hypocrite.

 

[Lord of Planar]

Tom Homan was investigated for accepting $50,000 from undercover FBI agents. Trump's DOJ shut it down.

The FBI and Justice officials closed the investigation, which a Justice Department appointee had called a “deep state” probe in early 2025.

www.msnbc.com

--

In an undercover operation last year, the FBI recorded Tom Homan, now the White House border czar, accepting $50,000 in cash after indicating he could help the agents — who were posing as business executives — win government contracts in a second Trump administration, according to multiple people familiar with the probe and internal documents reviewed by MSNBC.

The FBI and the Justice Department planned to wait to see whether Homan would deliver on his alleged promise once he became the nation’s top immigration official. But the case indefinitely stalled soon after Donald Trump became president again in January, according to six sources familiar with the matter. In recent weeks, Trump appointees officially closed the investigation, after FBI Director Kash Patel requested a status update on the case, two of the people said.

--

Outrageous.

It's just rumor until they release the video they claim they have, especially since he has no contract decision making.

When will the media stop lying?

 

[W_Heisenberg]

Fake news.

Tomorrow it will be something like, "Okay, it's not fake news, but it's not illegal."

The next day after that will be,"Okay, fine, whatever it's illegal, but...."

Tired of it.

 

[j brown's body]

He was filmed doing it.

"On Sept. 20, 2024, with hidden cameras recording the scene at a meeting spot in Texas, Homan accepted $50,000 in bills, according to an internal summary of the case and sources."

So where is the money now?

They still hired him and probably let him keep the money.

 

[W_Heisenberg]

It's just rumor until they release the video they claim they have, especially since he has no contract decision making.

When will the media stop lying?

Is it a rumor, or are they lying? Which is it.

If they release the video, then what will you say?

You will have some other bullshit excuse.

Excuses excuses excuses

"It was the Deep State."

"It was an accident."

"Everyone does it."

"It's not that bad. It was only $50,000"

The truth is you don't care.

That's the truth.

 

[Lord of Planar]

They still hired him and probably let him keep the money.

And what if this news account is just another lie?

 

[The AntiDonald]

LOL!!

So...you actually believe the guy accepted 50K from anyone.

Homan always struck me as highly corrupted. The article says he took a bribe. Very believable. Then Trump shut down the investigation. I have to believe it was to protect Homan. Wonder why he needed protecting if he never did anything?

 

[Lord of Planar]

Is it a rumor, or are they lying?

If they release the video, then what will you say?

You will have some other bullshit excuse.

Excuses excuses excuses

It was the Deep State.

It was an accident.

Everyone does it.

The truth is you don't care.

That's the truth.

I will say bullshit until they release a video showing such an exchange. I have learned now that until the media proves its reporting to be true, ti consider it bullshit.

 

[noonereal]

The guy accepting the 50K from undercover FBI agents is the deep state, yes?

It was a mindless post. Ignore it.

 

[j brown's body]

It's just rumor until they release the video they claim they have, especially since he has no contract decision making.

When will the media stop lying?

Its coming out with the Epstein files.

 

[VySky]

Is it a rumor, or are they lying? Which is it.

If they release the video, then what will you say?

You will have some other bullshit excuse.

Excuses excuses excuses

"It was the Deep State."

"It was an accident."

"Everyone does it."

"It's not that bad. It was only $50,000"

The truth is you don't care.

That's the truth.

Sounds like a load of whale dung.

Yea, fake news sources say.

 

[Rexedgar]

It's just rumor until they release the video they claim they have, especially since he has no contract decision making.

Doesn’t matter what decision making power he had or was going to have. He advertised that he could. Do you lot ever get fatigued defending this crap out of hand?

When will the media stop lying?

 

[j brown's body]

Sounds like a load of whale dung.

Yea, fake news sources say.

Like the great Russia hoax.

Trump campaign Russia contacts were 'grave threat', says Senate report

A Republican-led Senate committee says the Trump campaign's Russia links were an intelligence threat.

www.bbc.com

 

[rahl]

I'm not surprised that you would believe fake news and I'm even less surprised that you find the truth insulting.

What is your evidence it’s fake?

 

[Mycroft]

Homan always struck me as highly corrupted. The article says he took a bribe. Very believable. Then Trump shut down the investigation. I have to believe it was to protect Homan. Wonder why he needed protecting if he never did anything?

shrug...

Enjoy your nothingburger.

 

[VySky]

Like the great Russia hoax.

Trump campaign Russia contacts were 'grave threat', says Senate report

A Republican-led Senate committee says the Trump campaign's Russia links were an intelligence threat.

www.bbc.com

Thread 'Dear Liberals, How Many Of These MSM Hoaxes Did You Fall For?'

Nov 4, 2022

Let’s be honest now. We have good memories
—————

How many recent mainstream media hoaxes did you fall for? ... and/or still believe?

• Russian collusion
• Trump called neo-nazis "fine people"
• Jussie Smollett
• Bubba Wallace garage pull
• Covington kids
• Governor Whitmer kidnapping plot
• Kavanaugh rape
• Trump pee tape
• COVID lab leak was a conspiracy theory
• Border agents whipped migrants
• Trump saved nuclear secrets at Mar-a-Lago
• Steele Dossier
• Russian bounties on US soldiers in Afghanistan
• Trump said drinking bleach would fight COVID
• Muslim travel ban...

• VySky
• Replies: 676
• Forum: Bias in the Media

• 

 

[rahl]

Biden didn't know anything. Hell, he didn't even know what day of the week it was at any given time.

But his pukes and their associates and supporters prepared well in advance for a possible Trump win and it wasn't even a secret. They prepared months before the election to flood the Trump administration with lawsuit after lawsuit and they TOLD people that's what they were doing.

Here is what Copilot says about it...

did people who were opposed to trump plan in advance of the 2024 election to bring lawsuits against a possible trump administration​

​

Yes, there’s evidence that some groups opposed to Donald Trump planned legal strategies well in advance of the 2024 election, anticipating potential challenges if he returned to office.​

​

Pre-Election Legal Preparations​

• According to reporting from USA Today, organizations like United Sovereign Americans began filing lawsuits before Election Day 2024, aiming to challenge voter roll practices in battleground states. Their stated goal was to block certification of results unless certain demands were met.
• ABC News revealed that both Democratic and Republican teams ramped up litigation efforts ahead of the election. Democrats, in particular, focused on countering what they described as “baseless Republican lawsuits,” with Vice President Kamala Harris’s legal team preparing to intervene aggressively.
• The Associated Press noted that Democrats built a legal infrastructure with hundreds of lawyers and staffers to respond to GOP lawsuits, many of which were filed before ballots were even cast.

Why This Matters ​

These legal maneuvers weren’t just reactive—they were strategic. The anticipation of post-election disputes, especially given Trump’s history of contesting results, led both sides to prepare for courtroom battles. While Republicans focused on “election integrity,” Democrats framed their efforts as “voter protection.”​

​

So yes, there was a coordinated legal push from Trump opponents, not necessarily to sue a future administration directly, but to preemptively challenge election-related issues that could affect the outcome or legitimacy of a Trump victory.​

No.

 

[rahl]

Fake news.

Prove it

 

[Michael Cole]

Biden didn't know anything.

???

You said the investigation into Homan is a lie, done to hurt Trump, before Trump was elected. Mind readers. Take a breath.

Hell, he didn't even know what day of the week it was at any given time.

But his pukes and their associates and supporters prepared well in advance for a possible Trump win and it wasn't even a secret. They prepared months before the election to flood the Trump administration with lawsuit after lawsuit and they TOLD people that's what they were doing.

Here is what Copilot says about it...

did people who were opposed to trump plan in advance of the 2024 election to bring lawsuits against a possible trump administration​

​

Yes, there’s evidence that some groups opposed to Donald Trump planned legal strategies well in advance of the 2024 election, anticipating potential challenges if he returned to office.​

​

Pre-Election Legal Preparations​

• According to reporting from USA Today, organizations like United Sovereign Americans began filing lawsuits before Election Day 2024, aiming to challenge voter roll practices in battleground states. Their stated goal was to block certification of results unless certain demands were met.
• ABC News revealed that both Democratic and Republican teams ramped up litigation efforts ahead of the election. Democrats, in particular, focused on countering what they described as “baseless Republican lawsuits,” with Vice President Kamala Harris’s legal team preparing to intervene aggressively.
• The Associated Press noted that Democrats built a legal infrastructure with hundreds of lawyers and staffers to respond to GOP lawsuits, many of which were filed before ballots were even cast.

Why This Matters ​

These legal maneuvers weren’t just reactive—they were strategic. The anticipation of post-election disputes, especially given Trump’s history of contesting results, led both sides to prepare for courtroom battles. While Republicans focused on “election integrity,” Democrats framed their efforts as “voter protection.”​

​

So yes, there was a coordinated legal push from Trump opponents, not necessarily to sue a future administration directly, but to preemptively challenge election-related issues that could affect the outcome or legitimacy of a Trump victory.​

No.

 

[VySky]

What is your evidence it’s fake?

You have it backwards.

 

[VySky]

Prove it

There is no proof anything happened?