• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Tom Homan was investigated for accepting $50,000 from undercover FBI agents. Trump's DOJ shut it down.

Lord of Planar said:
The investigation may have been real. It probably was. That does not mean the allegations had any merit.

Do any of you lefties have any wisdom at all?
Click to expand...

LOL. I can't stop laughing. This is SOOOooo hard for you.

You, earlier, were saying the media was lying and could not be trusted.

And all the media said about Homan was that he took the cash and there was an investigation. That's it.

Are now you agreeing with us that media did not lie and that the story is legitimate?
 
W_Heisenberg said:
As an aside, I have noticed over the past 10 years that many Trump supporters don't understand public corruption...
Click to expand...
They understand it. They just don't care when it is someone on "their team" who is indulging in corruption.
 
Visbek said:
They understand it. They just don't care when it is someone on "their team" who is indulging in corruption.
Click to expand...
Where is the actual proof there was corruption by Holman? “Sources say” is not actual evidence.
 
Surprise! Congressional Democrats are starting to investigate the handling of the Homan investigation.

Homan's attorney released the following statement.
 
W_Heisenberg said:
LOL.

If somebody asks you on national television if you took a bag of $50,000 dollars in cash, you say, "I did NOT take the cash."

Even Trump is smart enough to lie.
Click to expand...
Why do you lie about the conversation? She did not ask him if he took it. She gave him a chance to address an allegation. Words have meaning. I guess you think your fellow lefties are too dumb and will agree with you, or you do not see what you do yourself. Are you also a product of the Department of Education Indoctrination?

I now have a mental note to watch you closer for lies.
W_Heisenberg said:
You just admitted it wasn't an asinine conclusion.
Click to expand...
I misspelled a word and I am saying yours is an asinine conclusion.
W_Heisenberg said:
It's totally reasonable to conclude, "Wow, this guy probably took the cash."
Click to expand...
No, that is your confirmation bias in play.
 
Lord of Planar said:
Why do you lie about the conversation? She did not ask him if he took it. She gave him a chance to address an allegation.
Click to expand...

Laura Ingraham said:

"I wanna give you a chance to address this article that came out over the weekend. It was on our always reliable MSNBC and they said that you took $50,000 dollars in cash in a bag from an undercover FBI agent to help them win government contracts in Trump's second term. The DOJ said they concluded there was no criminal wrongdoing, but nevertheless, that story is out there, and I imagine you want to respond to that."



The allegation is that he took cash as a bribe. THAT is the allegation.

Visbek said:
They understand it. They just don't care when it is someone on "their team" who is indulging in corruption.
Click to expand...

Sadly, I think this is true.
 
W_Heisenberg said:
LOL. I can't stop laughing. This is SOOOooo hard for you.

You, earlier, were saying the media was lying and could not be trusted.
Click to expand...
Lying about him taking the money. Jeez.... Do I have to hold your hand and spell all this out word by word?

Why do you ASSume so many dumb things? I never claimed, assumed, or implied there was no investigation. In fact, I'm pretty sure I said there probably was one.
W_Heisenberg said:
And all the media said about Homan was that he took the cash and there was an investigation. That's it.
Click to expand...
Bullshit. There you go again lying.

Do you know how to tell the truth? They also claimed a camera. The article also included WH comments that this was just more Biden administration attempts to get the presidents men. I say it does look like attempted entrapment.
W_Heisenberg said:
Are now you agreeing with us that media did not lie and that the story is legitimate?
Click to expand...
I suspect the media either lied, or reported a lie, regarding the alleged facts of the investigation.

My God man. Details matter. If you cannot understand details, then never bother me again with such silliness.
 
TamleeB said:
Where is the actual proof there was corruption by Holman? “Sources say” is not actual evidence.
Click to expand...
lol

First of all, my comments weren't limited to the Homan investigation. I could be here all day listing evidence of rampant corruption that Republicans try to sweep under the rug -- and examples where Democrats do not put up with that BS, even from other Democrats.

Second, it appears that Patel tried to bury the Actual Proof of Homan's corruption. That's why Congressional Democrats are trying to open an investigation.
 
W_Heisenberg said:
Laura Ingraham said:

"I wanna give you a chance to address this article that came out over the weekend. It was on our always reliable MSNBC and they said that you took $50,000 dollars in cash in a bag from an undercover FBI agent to help them win government contracts in Trump's second term. The DOJ said they concluded there was no criminal wrongdoing, but nevertheless, that story is out there, and I imagine you want to respond to that."



The allegation is that he took cash as a bribe. THAT is the allegation.



Sadly, I think this is true.
Click to expand...

Duh....

You still fail to comprehend.

Words have meaning.
 
Visbek said:
lol

First of all, my comments weren't limited to the Homan investigation. I could be here all day listing evidence of rampant corruption that Republicans try to sweep under the rug -- and examples where Democrats do not put up with that BS, even from other Democrats.

Second, it appears that Patel tried to bury the Actual Proof of Homan's corruption. That's why Congressional Democrats are trying to open an investigation.
Click to expand...
Wonderful! You do let me know when there is actual evidence regarding Homan. Not just “sources say”.
 
"made the problem go away"

Everything this Trump Administration does is like the Mafia.



 
Lord of Planar said:
This thread is another example of how far the party of hate will go.
Click to expand...
Says the guy defending a guy who is on video taking a bribe, lol.

Why keep pretending? Trump isn't pretending anymore. It's fine because he's on your team and that's all you care about. Be brave enough to say what you really think, for once.
 
TamleeB said:
Wonderful!
Click to expand...
So, you think the FBI covering up corruption is a good thing?

It's rather fascinating how you didn't demand evidence before accusing Biden of corruption....
T

Post in thread 'DOJ Asked to Investigate Joe Biden's 'Cognitive Decline' While President'

Ethel2 said:
Perhaps you would like to name the crime for which you think Joe Biden should be investigated.

Then I will name the ACTUAL crimes for which the felon has been CONVICTED.
Click to expand...
Corruption and abuse of political office for starters!
 
Visbek said:
So, you think the FBI covering up corruption is a good thing?

It's rather fascinating how you didn't demand evidence before accusing Biden of corruption....
T

Post in thread 'DOJ Asked to Investigate Joe Biden's 'Cognitive Decline' While President'

Ethel2 said:
Perhaps you would like to name the crime for which you think Joe Biden should be investigated.

Then I will name the ACTUAL crimes for which the felon has been CONVICTED.
Click to expand...
Corruption and abuse of political office for starters!
Click to expand...
Before I accuse Biden of corruption”? Can you expand upon your claim please.
 
jpn said:
Did you see AOC's tweet? Priceless:

Click to expand...

That poor little girl is still emotionally damaged from the time he schooled her on the border, in front of Congress. One of the all-time great takedowns of any politician ever. I guess her therapy isn't working so well.
 
I'm even more convinced now that this is a bullshit story than I was when it first came out.
 
If you are Border Czar Homans, and you did NOT take the $50,000 in a paper bag, wouldn't you been screaming at the top of your lungs that you want the FBI tape of the transaction released publicly in order to clear your name?

Yet he isn't doing that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom