• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

To Introduce Myself

Thetexastrigger

New member
Joined
Feb 11, 2013
Messages
8
Reaction score
5
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Libertarian
Hello all,

I am glad to be here, and I can't wait to debate with you all in the hopes that we may sharpen our skills in persuasion and rhetoric.

For full disclosure, I would categorize my philosophy as voluntarist, my economics as capitalist, and my political leaning as anarchist. More specifically, many of you might call me a Rothbardian anarcho-capitalist in the tradition of the Austrian School of economics with special emphasis on Misesian Praxeology. So...I do not fall into any mould of the American left or right - I detest both which can make me fairly unpopular.

With that said, I have many socialist, Neocon, Liberal Democrat, and anarcho-syndicalist friends, so little shocks me.

I am a pretty regular member of the forums over at mises.org and libertyhq.freeforums.org, but I wanted to branch out a little bit so I could read and learn more from those who are less likely to "preach to my choir", as one might say.

More than anything else, I am really hoping to better my debating skills. I find it unlikely that my mind will change on much, however I am always open to the idea as my world view has changed in a drastic way before - if the argument is sound enough, intellectual honesty demands one change his mind. I also think we can all benefit each other even if we never agree, for we can learn where are arguments need work, and a forum like this gives all of us the opportunity to display our arguments for those less convinced of an opinion so that these individuals can be more educated when they form one. May the best ideology win.

I will, of course, always do my best to be civil so long as those who argue with me are willing to do the same. The attitude I try to have throughout any argument I have with another is that the motivations that most people have are good. I believe that nearly all of us agree on the ends; we want all of mankind to have access to the greatest standards of living possible and be as happy as possible. What we disagree on are the means by which we achieve that end. Only with that attitude in mind, do I believe that we can ever have meaningful debate.

Concordantly, if I didn't enjoy talking to those I don't agree with, I wouldn't be here. I think it far better than hanging with one's "choir", so to speak. Hopefully we can all at least find some common ground there and I know I will make many friends because of this.

Thanks for having me,
The Texas Trigger.

P.S. - Please feel free to leave a short comment on where each of you stand politically. I am certain I will find it interesting. Nearly everyone is unique in one way or another, and getting to know these nuanced differences always fascinates me. Thanks!
 
More specifically, many of you might call me a Rothbardian anarcho-capitalist in the tradition of the Austrian School of economics with special emphasis on Misesian Praxeology.

I wouldn't have guessed that about you in a thousand years.
 
I do think you have posted a very compact written impression of Ron Paul down to an art form of mimicky.
 
PS... Welcome to the forum.
Personally, I'm a Ron Paul-hater, but this is an open forum.
 
I wouldn't have guessed that about you in a thousand years.

I have little idea what many of those conspiratorial (my guess) words mean nor care to look them up, other than when a person states they believe in "Austrian" economic theory that is a Ron Paulite. All of it sounds like Ron Paul literature.
 
I have little idea what many of those conspiratorial (my guess) words mean nor care to look them up, other than when a person states they believe in "Austrian" economic theory that is a Ron Paulite. All of it sounds like Ron Paul literature.

Dr. Paul has not yet realized there was a Nixon surprise...
 
MaggieD - sarcastic? I am not sure what you mean.

Joko - thanks for responding. I look forward to learning about why you detest Ron Paul. His foreign policy? His economic policy? Both? To clarify, Austrian Economics are not "Paulite" but, rather, Ron Paul subscribes to Austrian Economics. Ron Paul certainly made more people aware of the Austrian school of economics, much like Paul Krugman made more people aware of Keynesian economics, but in no way did he shape the school's position. You may find it interesting that, while I fundamentally agree with many of Ron's positions, I do not agree that the best way to achieve them is to become president...doing so betrays my entire ideology of anarchy. At best, Paul did a good job of spreading Libertarianism, but unfortunately it was a very watered down (and ultimately impotent) version of it. So...I actually did not want him to win the election (not that I had to worry about that); in fact, I did not vote in the elections whatsoever.

AlabamaPaul - I do not know what you mean? Could you clarify please?
 
I really liked what you wrote below. I'm new here as well and looking for enriching conversations and debate.

More than anything else, I am really hoping to better my debating skills. I find it unlikely that my mind will change on much, however I am always open to the idea as my world view has changed in a drastic way before - if the argument is sound enough, intellectual honesty demands one change his mind. I also think we can all benefit each other even if we never agree, for we can learn where are arguments need work, and a forum like this gives all of us the opportunity to display our arguments for those less convinced of an opinion so that these individuals can be more educated when they form one. May the best ideology win.

I will, of course, always do my best to be civil so long as those who argue with me are willing to do the same. The attitude I try to have throughout any argument I have with another is that the motivations that most people have are good. I believe that nearly all of us agree on the ends; we want all of mankind to have access to the greatest standards of living possible and be as happy as possible. What we disagree on are the means by which we achieve that end. Only with that attitude in mind, do I believe that we can ever have meaningful debate.
 
Welcome triple T.;)
I'm a pretty typical American libertarian. Fiscal conservative, social liberal, who generally finds the vast majority of politicians to be liars, panderers, and generally distasteful humans. :lol:
 
Welcome, welcome. I know what it is like to be on a forum where you are just preaching to the choir for the most part. I am personally centre-left economically and on some issues lean more to the left, socially I am also very liberal. So I usually call myself a social-demcorat.
 
The Nixon Surprise was the removal of the US from the gold standard...

Good evening, AP
.
After a previous President had his "confiscation of such gold from the public" surprise.

It's always something with those guys, isn't it? :) And surprisingly, it always seems to benefit the government, and not the people... :(
 
Good evening, AP
.
After a previous President had his "confiscation of such gold from the public" surprise.

It's always something with those guys, isn't it? :) And surprisingly, it always seems to benefit the government, and not the people... :(

Nixon made the correct move, but it is what has allowed the deficit to explode due to the reality of how the economy actually works today. Good evening pg...
 
Nixon made the correct move, but it is what has allowed the deficit to explode due to the reality of ho the economy actually works today. Good evening pg...

How are we handling giving Germany their tons of gold back, as they have requested?
 
How are we handling giving Germany their tons of gold back, as they have requested?

It's their gold. Our gold is held at the Fed at a value of less than $50/ounce...
 
Hello all,

I am glad to be here, and I can't wait to debate with you all in the hopes that we may sharpen our skills in persuasion and rhetoric.

For full disclosure, I would categorize my philosophy as voluntarist, my economics as capitalist, and my political leaning as anarchist. More specifically, many of you might call me a Rothbardian anarcho-capitalist in the tradition of the Austrian School of economics with special emphasis on Misesian Praxeology. So...I do not fall into any mould of the American left or right - I detest both which can make me fairly unpopular.

With that said, I have many socialist, Neocon, Liberal Democrat, and anarcho-syndicalist friends, so little shocks me.

I am a pretty regular member of the forums over at mises.org and libertyhq.freeforums.org, but I wanted to branch out a little bit so I could read and learn more from those who are less likely to "preach to my choir", as one might say.

More than anything else, I am really hoping to better my debating skills. I find it unlikely that my mind will change on much, however I am always open to the idea as my world view has changed in a drastic way before - if the argument is sound enough, intellectual honesty demands one change his mind. I also think we can all benefit each other even if we never agree, for we can learn where are arguments need work, and a forum like this gives all of us the opportunity to display our arguments for those less convinced of an opinion so that these individuals can be more educated when they form one. May the best ideology win.

I will, of course, always do my best to be civil so long as those who argue with me are willing to do the same. The attitude I try to have throughout any argument I have with another is that the motivations that most people have are good. I believe that nearly all of us agree on the ends; we want all of mankind to have access to the greatest standards of living possible and be as happy as possible. What we disagree on are the means by which we achieve that end. Only with that attitude in mind, do I believe that we can ever have meaningful debate.

Concordantly, if I didn't enjoy talking to those I don't agree with, I wouldn't be here. I think it far better than hanging with one's "choir", so to speak. Hopefully we can all at least find some common ground there and I know I will make many friends because of this.

Thanks for having me,
The Texas Trigger.

P.S. - Please feel free to leave a short comment on where each of you stand politically. I am certain I will find it interesting. Nearly everyone is unique in one way or another, and getting to know these nuanced differences always fascinates me. Thanks!

To you, wherever you migrated from, as many of us recently have, :wcm
 
:tink: Welcome to Debate Politics.



There is information regarding my viewpoints in a separate thread. Please be sure to read the Rules/TOS - hope you enjoy the site.
 
Welcome, welcome. I know what it is like to be on a forum where you are just preaching to the choir for the most part. I am personally centre-left economically and on some issues lean more to the left, socially I am also very liberal. So I usually call myself a social-demcorat.

ah, I hate you guys...just kidding. Thanks for the reply. Look forward to talking more with you.
 
The Nixon Surprise was the removal of the US from the gold standard...

I've never heard that term before. I am quite sure that Ron Paul is aware that Nixon did that. I don't see how your remark is relevant. Thanks.
 
9-10-07_Photos_062.jpg


Greetings The Texas Trigger.....Welcome to the Forums of Debate Politics!
yo2.gif
 
Back
Top Bottom