Them agreeing with the right more than the left is why I consider them right wing. The extreme part comes later. You are confusing two points and thinking that they are the same.
No. You put us on a 1-D scale and called us extreme right-wing. It doesn't fit the designation given what is common with the extreme right-wing. The one who is confused is you. You want to say we're "right-wing" because sometimes at least on the most visible problems we have higher tendency to agree with the right. Then you want to add extreme because you want to try to make us out as something that easily fits your preconceived notions of what libertarians are. Thus you call us "extreme right-wing"; but we are not extreme right wing because the extreme-right wing is counter to everything libertarians stand for.
Of course. Whether a person thinks something is extreme is largely an opinion. I see no problem there. But I think you misunderstood, you guys are not extreme conservatives, you guys are just extreme and happen to have more in common with conservatives, enough that you are essentially a conservative philosophy with a bit of weird mixed in ( only wanting private roads, etc). The extremism and the conservativism are separate functions that junction (I like rhyming

)
Then you're going to need another axis. Because your current designation of libertarians as extreme right-wing is incorrect and based in ignorance.
Go on and just throw out arguments you don't like. Shows your weak debate skills. But the point is that on a 1-D mapping of the political grid, libertarianism is well more in line with classic liberalism than anything else. And if we're just using one dimensional political designation then you have the extreme right on one side which has a lot of authoritative and fascist ideals and the extreme left on the other side which would have communism and socialism; both which require big State government in the end. So you have big state government on the extreme right, big state government on the extreme left. So where's the minimal State government where true liberals and libertarians would find themselves? Somewhere in the middle.
So once again, you designation of libertarians as extreme right-wing is wrong.
Because something is similar does not mean it is the same. Like I posted, liberals and libertarians tend to agree on some social stances for completely different reasons, so any correlation there is moot.
There are many issues the new liberals and libertarians (the old liberals) would agree on. It's yet another reason why libertarians are not an extreme right-wing philosophy.
Weird stuff like wanting to get rid of paper money is pretty extreme. :shrug: But again, its an opinion thing.
That's not all of us, and that's not an extreme right-wing view point. It's a minarchist view point; but you aren't allowing for that axis.
Ahh authoritative stuff. Thats why libertarians and liberals might find themselves on the same side of stuff, but for different reasons. That was part of my point. You cannot say you have much in common with liberals if you agree on stuff for completely different reasons.
So? We don't agree with conservatives all the time for the same reasons; yet you seem so much more willing to throw us in with them because we agree with them sometimes. So what is it? Does the reasoning count or no? If no, then we're even closer to center on your 1-D axis.
We will agree to disagree on this one.
You can disagree all you want, real world measurements says you're wrong. Along with your incorrect designation of libertarians as extreme right-wing.