- Joined
- Jul 29, 2009
- Messages
- 34,478
- Reaction score
- 17,282
- Location
- Southwestern U.S.
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Conservative
Time to admit Obamanomics has failed
Examiner Editorial
August 8, 2010
It's no coincidence that Christina Romer, chairwoman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, announced her retirement the day before Friday's brutal unemployment report. With 131,000 more jobs lost in July, and downward revisions of 97,000 for the previous two months, it's easy to see why she would start looking for the exits.
Romer is best known for drafting the February 2009 report "The Job Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan," which the White House used as an ammunition belt in the fight to gain passage of its $862 billion economic stimulus bill (the actual cost of which exceeds $1 trillion when interest is included). Romer predicted that following passage of the stimulus bill, unemployment would plateau below 8 percent last fall and by this month register at 7 percent. That's not close enough for government work, as unemployment stands at 9.5 percent today. It would be higher except that hundreds of thousands of frustrated job seekers have given up looking for new jobs and dropped out of the labor force.
I think it's time for Republicans to admit that you cannot continue to fight 4 wars, provide domestic security and law enforcement, and maintain national public infrastructure without raising taxes to pay for it.
I think it's time for Democrats to admit that Bush had those same problems.
Yes, he did. And he created them as wll. Bush invaded Afghanistan and Iraq. And a Republican congress let him. While I hold up neither party as being superior, the facts are the facts.
I think it's time for Republicans to admit that you cannot continue to fight 4 wars, provide domestic security and law enforcement, and maintain national public infrastructure without raising taxes to pay for it.
82 Democrats voted for invasion of Iraq. 126 against. Seems like the Republicans had a whole lotta' help.
As for Afghanistan:
On September 14, 2001 bill House Joint Resolution 64 passed in the House. The totals in the House of Representatives were: 420 Ayes, 1 Nay and 10 Not Voting (the Nay was Barbara Lee - D-CA).
Senate
On September 14, 2001 Senate Joint Resolution 23 passed in the Senate by roll call vote. The totals in the Senate were: 98 Ayes, 0 Nays, 2 Present/Not Voting (Senators Larry Craig - R and Jesse Helms - R).
Overwhelming, yes? Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Really? Last I check the Democrats have been in control for the last two years. They have had every opportunity to take care of it.
So you're saying there are conservative Democrats. No big surprise there.
82 Democrats voted for invasion of Iraq. 126 against. Seems like the Republicans had a whole lotta' help.
As for Afghanistan:
On September 14, 2001 bill House Joint Resolution 64 passed in the House. The totals in the House of Representatives were: 420 Ayes, 1 Nay and 10 Not Voting (the Nay was Barbara Lee - D-CA).
Senate
On September 14, 2001 Senate Joint Resolution 23 passed in the Senate by roll call vote. The totals in the Senate were: 98 Ayes, 0 Nays, 2 Present/Not Voting (Senators Larry Craig - R and Jesse Helms - R).
Overwhelming, yes? Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Is that what she is saying? Or is she saying enough with the whiney "Republicans did it!" bull**** argument. Is she saying facts are BOTH sides voted for Afghhanistan and Iraq so end the bull**** idiological rhetoric? You make it mean "there are conservative democrats"...OK...fine. lets pretend thats the 'truth'. Does it make them any less culpable? Of course not. So whenever someone says stupid **** like 'republicans voted for war' maybe all those honest liberals can put them in check.
BTW...Who took us to war against Serbia? How long has that mission gone on? Just...you know...out of curiosity...
I think it's time for conservatives to admit that you cannot continue to fight 4 wars, provide domestic security and law enforcement, and maintain national public infrastructure without raising taxes to pay for it.
Really? Last I check the Democrats have been in control for the last two years. They have had every opportunity to take care of it.
You're right. I was mistaken.
There we go. Fixed it.
You're right. I was mistaken.
There we go. Fixed it.
Actually, there was never a vote for the invasion of Iraq. Again, facts are facts. When you read something into it, you leave the factual. There was no vote to invade. No declaration of war.
As for Afghanistan, whihc was understandable if misguided, the vote doesn'tmatter. The president was Bush and the congress was republican. Agian, those are the facts.
Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq (final vote)
October 10, 2002
Passed, 296-133, view details
Dem: 81-126 opposed, GOP: 215-6 in favor, Ind: 1 opposed
The president was Bush and the congress was republican. Agian, those are the facts.
Since January of 2007...unless my math has failed me...thats 4 months shy of FOUR years now...and since Jan of 2009 they have held a super-majority in both the house and senate.
Not coincidentally...unemployment was still under 5% when the democrats took control of both branches of the legislature...
2001 4.7
2002 5.8
20031 6.0%
20041 5.5
20051 5.1
2006 4.6
2007 4.6
it's disengenuous to blame unemployment on dems and obama.
it's disengenuous to blame unemployment on dems and obama.
Congressional actions on the Iraq War prior to the 2003 U.S. invasion - SourceWatch
Yes, they are. The only two you got right.
Again, that is not a vote to invade. It was a vote to let the president decide. There was no vote to invade, and no declaration of war. I'm sorry, but the facts are what they are.
Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq (final vote)
October 10, 2002
Passed, 296-133, view details
Dem: 81-126 opposed, GOP: 215-6 in favor, Ind: 1 opposed
(a) AUTHORIZATION- The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to--
(1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and
(2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.
You are splitting hairs.
Bill Text - 107th Congress (2001-2002) - THOMAS (Library of Congress)
In hindsight, this legislation was probably drafted to make Bush the fall guy. Had they voted it down, nonetheless, we wouldn't have gone there - period.
You are splitting hairs.
Bill Text - 107th Congress (2001-2002) - THOMAS (Library of Congress)
In hindsight, this legislation was probably drafted to make Bush the fall guy. Had they voted it down, nonetheless, we wouldn't have gone there - period.
No, I'm being factual. It was never brough to congress that we were going to invade Iraq. In fact, some of those who voted to let the president decided stated clearly they would oppose us doing just that. So, accuracy is key here.
And no matter how it was drafted, in a republican congress, we only have what was factually done. We are inaccurate when we read itno our bias, our desire to make it something we cannot prove it is. Factually, congress passed the buck to Bush, and Bush decided. I consider congress cowardly and shirking their responsibility, but the facts are the facts.
Say that again just a LITTLE bit differently...I consider congress...DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS...cowardly and shirking their responsibility...and suddenly we have common ground.
No, I'm being factual. It was never brough to congress that we were going to invade Iraq. In fact, some of those who voted to let the president decided stated clearly they would oppose us doing just that. So, accuracy is key here.
And no matter how it was drafted, in a republican congress, we only have what was factually done. We are inaccurate when we read itno our bias, our desire to make it something we cannot prove it is. Factually, congress passed the buck to Bush, and Bush decided. I consider congress cowardly and shirking their responsibility, but the facts are the facts.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?