• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Time, Obama, Hitler & Gun Bans – Is History About To Repeat Itself?

What are talking about ever hear of the history chanel .... history books and I swear im not a member of nra serously all you left and right winners are all stupid you always think there are only two veiw points thats it impossible to be on both sides look up swittzerland if we adapt there ways when it comes to weapons actually respect a gun instead of just admire or fear one if children are taught at a young age when a gun should be used or not be used and they had proper back round cheeks as well . FYI since all the swiss citizens were armed ( a milittia) they acually were not invaded unlike their un armed counter parts (ie the other countries around them)

Can't deal with the link debunking your myth, so it's time to distract and talk about Switzerland.

Got it! That's all gunlovers can do, distract, misinform, create memes.
 
Ok.

So if we were to take history ques from TIME magazine or the NOBEL peace prize... oh boy, we'd be in a lot of trouble by now... big trouble.
 
So it isn't about gun control, now the issue is the Holocaust, which the NRA could have stopped by issuing handguns to children.

Keep on with the gun myths. It's all you have.

Now, did Hitler ban guns or didn't he. Answer: no. A pure NRA myth. It's all you got.

The Myth Of Hitler’s Gun Ban | The Propaganda Professor

I didn't claim he banned them. Sufficient legislation was already in place that certainly aided him. The following quote is from your link. Pay particular attention to the second paragraph where it is explained what his most useful tool was. I think you will find that your link describes you very well as a tool. I couldn't agree more.

What he did say, seven years later, was this: “The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to permit the conquered Eastern peoples to have arms. History teaches that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so.” So it’s fair to conclude that he believed “gun control” had its uses. But that’s quite a different thing from claiming that “gun control” was instrumental in the NAZI rise to power.

And the truth is that no gun law was passed in Germany in 1935. There was no need for one, since a gun registration program was already in effect in Germany; it was enacted in 1928, five years before Hitler’s ascendancy. But that law did not “outlaw” guns, it just restricted their possession to individuals who were considered law-abiding citizens, and who had a reason to own one. And there’s no reason to consider that law particularly significant, either; the NAZIs didn’t seize control of their own country with gunpowder. They used a much more potent weapon: propaganda.
 
Can't deal with the link debunking your myth, so it's time to distract and talk about Switzerland.

Got it! That's all gunlovers can do, distract, misinform, create memes.

Im so sorry but unless it comes from a .edu or .org site i dont wast my time reading. Come on Is this all you got calling me nra a gun lover . I guess that is all you can do to distract your self from the truth i got numbers and statistics you got name calling heres a qoute from your site.

" My background is in folklore, literature and forensics. I am not an expert in history, science or math, though I consider myself better versed in those topics than the average lay person. I was once a film critic. I also once worked for the IRS. Both jobs were fun jobs working with fun people. Really. " My background is in folklore, literature and forensics. I am not an expert in history, science or math, though I consider myself better versed in those topics than the average lay person. I was once a film critic. I also once worked for the IRS. Both jobs were fun jobs working with fun people. Really.
 
Im so sorry but unless it comes from a .edu or .org site i dont wast my time reading. Come on Is this all you got calling me nra a gun lover . I guess that is all you can do to distract your self from the truth i got numbers and statistics you got name calling heres a qoute from your site.

" My background is in folklore, literature and forensics. I am not an expert in history, science or math, though I consider myself better versed in those topics than the average lay person. I was once a film critic. I also once worked for the IRS. Both jobs were fun jobs working with fun people. Really. " My background is in folklore, literature and forensics. I am not an expert in history, science or math, though I consider myself better versed in those topics than the average lay person. I was once a film critic. I also once worked for the IRS. Both jobs were fun jobs working with fun people. Really.
(Rest
of my Rant)
HA HA HA HA ( serously never call me right wing its degrading) About Me | The Propaganda Professor But tell me what do you think about the swiss idea its like the ( dare i say it) the right wing and left wing can come together. The swiss has extrem gun control by having a waiting list time before you can receive the gun and extensive backround cheeks . the right wing will enjoy everyone having a gun .
 
HOJ has never gotten a single fact correct. On any thread. Ever. It's uncanny.
 
TLDR

I see the word Obama and Hitler in the same story. I dont like Godwin's law posts.

And I don't like history repeating itself, learn it please.

Just because Hitler did something is no reason not to oppose it or prevent it for fear of being Godwinned.

HOJ has never gotten a single fact correct. On any thread. Ever. It's uncanny.

He's a completely ignorant anti-liberty troll, who should be ignored like sangha, haymarket, HP Hockbaum and the other economically/historically ignorant demagogues.
 
Last edited:
And I don't like history repeating itself, learn it please.

Just because Hitler did something is no reason not to oppose it or prevent it for fear of being Godwinned.



He's a completely ignorant anti-liberty troll, who should be ignored like sangha, haymarket, HP Hockbaum and the other economically/historically ignorant demagogues.

When someone compares anyone to Hitler you can tell one sure thing. The person doing the comparing has a poor education. Same thing for those who go around calling people anti Christ.
 
And I don't like history repeating itself, learn it please.

Just because Hitler did something is no reason not to oppose it or prevent it for fear of being Godwinned.



He's a completely ignorant anti-liberty troll, who should be ignored like sangha, haymarket, HP Hockbaum and the other economically/historically ignorant demagogues.

I think the Hitler confiscation of guns was an entirely unrelated event: Since the German army was never really properly demobilized after the armistice, due to the chaos resulting from the abdication of the Kaiser, there were alot of people running around with weapons left over from the "Great War"..................
 
change-hitler-obama-lenin.jpg
 
:lamo

Your misinformation never stops, does it? Your paranoia? Come on guys, let's be realistic about these gun laws. Show me a link to the gun laws that you are referring to? Show me what the bills contain.
 
You know hitler also treid to keep the guns out of the peoples hands just what obama is trying to do now ... wow that is pretty much what this debate is about

Exactly how is Obama trying to keep guns out of peoples hands?
 
Exactly how is Obama trying to keep guns out of peoples hands?

It's no wonder these type of people blindly support bad, unpatriotic laws. . . "just pass it so we can read what's in it"

He's doing it by regulating it out of reach of everyone but the rich folks & their security detail - as in incrementally where the sheep are conditioned to the new norm.
 
And I don't like history repeating itself, learn it please.

Just because Hitler did something is no reason not to oppose it or prevent it for fear of being Godwinned.



He's a completely ignorant anti-liberty troll, who should be ignored like sangha, haymarket, HP Hockbaum and the other economically/historically ignorant demagogues.

Go ahead and ignore. It doesnt change the fact that those that invoke the Hitler comparison in an argument are the ignorant ones.
Let me guess, you've invoked Godwins law before and were called out on it, huh? Felt kinda silly, huh?
 
And I don't like history repeating itself, learn it please.

Just because Hitler did something is no reason not to oppose it or prevent it for fear of being Godwinned..

It is if (a) Hitler didn't do it (he didn't ban guns, he liked them), and (b) it is a bizarre attempt to attribute Hitlerian policies to somebody who doesn't propose them, especially when even Hitler didn't.

It's another example of dishonest gun lover rhetoric pretending to be "arguments'.
 
HOJ has never gotten a single fact correct. On any thread. Ever. It's uncanny.

You can't even come up with an original dis, and have to steal my lines. Pitiful, but predictable.
 
I didn't claim he banned them. Sufficient legislation was already in place that certainly aided him. The following quote is from your link. Pay particular attention to the second paragraph where it is explained what his most useful tool was. I think you will find that your link describes you very well as a tool. I couldn't agree more.

You didn't read the link, did you. And nothing will persuade you to do so.

The Weimar Republic has lax gun laws, which allowed Hitler's brown shirts to destroy democratic elections by shooting opponents. If the WR has strong gun laws, Hitler never would have taken power.

Maybe you should move on to your next discredited rightwing meme.
 
You can't even come up with an original dis, and have to steal my lines. Pitiful, but predictable.

why would anyone want to steal your lines. Didn't you claim semi auto rifles were weapons of mass destruction
 
Demand number 22 of the 25 points of Hitler's Nazi Party:

22. We demand the abolition of the regular army and the creation of a national (folk) army.
The History Place - Rise of Hitler: The 25 Points of Hitler's Nazi Party

You can take all of that with a massive gain of salt. Hitler was not a fan of the German Republic, but here he's calling for nothing for all practical purposes. You might as well say that for all intents and purposes he's just calling to rename the Army to something else. Its like if a stereotypical Soviet looks at a slum and decides to rename it "People's Glorious Housing Unit," ya it has a better ideological name but its still the same slum. Just like Hitler "We don't have a regular Army we have a national people's Army," ok sure but it still looks like the same damn thing but with more swastikas.
 
You can take all of that with a massive gain of salt. Hitler was not a fan of the German Republic, but here he's calling for nothing for all practical purposes. You might as well say that for all intents and purposes he's just calling to rename the Army to something else. Its like if a stereotypical Soviet looks at a slum and decides to rename it "People's Glorious Housing Unit," ya it has a better ideological name but its still the same slum. Just like Hitler "We don't have a regular Army we have a national people's Army," ok sure but it still looks like the same damn thing but with more swastikas.

I think the lesson is that using Hitler to characterize modern political positions is something to be avoided.

Now, what does the OP say? What's good for the goose, is good for the gander.
 
Back
Top Bottom