• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Thomas Campbell is a former NASA physicist who developed his Theory of Everything—unifying quantum physics & consciousness.

NOLA Dude said:
He said the reported cost of $20 million for the 20-year project was minuscule compared to its value, and estimated that remote viewers saved the government about $240 million by helping find lost Scud missiles in the Persian Gulf War. Research has shown that remote viewing works 15 percent of the time or more, he said. "There is a huge percentage of intelligence collection systems that don't do as well."

The information provided by remote viewers, he reiterated, was never used without other types of corroboration. He said nearly every agency with an intelligence wing -- including the CIA, the National Security Agency, the Drug Enforcement Agency, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Secret Service, the Coast Guard and Customs -- employed remote viewers at some time or another.

On a typical workday, McMoneagle said, he reported to an old, leaky wooden barracks at Fort Meade, where he went into a one-person office. He sat at a desk with a typewriter and a mug of coffee. The cup said This End Up and had an arrow pointing the wrong way. He was then presented with sealed envelopes -- sometimes large brown ones, sometimes small white ones -- and he was asked to supply information about whatever was inside.

There might be a photograph of a person, and he would be asked to describe where the person was located. In that way, he said, he helped the Army locate hostages in Iran. He said he predicted almost precisely where Skylab was going to fall, 11 months before the spacecraft returned to Earth in 1979. He named the city in Italy -- Padua -- and described the second-floor apartment where Brig. Gen James Dozier was held hostage by the Red Brigades in 1981. The information arrived in Italy on the day Dozier was released.

Over the years, McMoneagle said, he was involved in about 450 missions. One of his favorites was in 1980, when CIA personnel captured a suspected KGB agent in South Africa. They wanted to know how the agent was communicating with the Soviet military. They put an envelope on McMoneagle's desk, and without knowing anything of the man, McMoneagle told the CIA that the man liked to use a small pocket calculator. The calculator turned out to be a disguised short-wave radio.

Last week he appeared on "Nightline" and on the ABC special "Put to the Test." "It's not like he handed me a perfect photograph of the location," said independent producer Ruth Rivin, of Elemental Productions, when asked about McMoneagle's performance. "Some of the descriptions were pretty remarkable," she said. "We followed all the scientific protocol laid out by Edwin May, a nuclear physicist {at SRI} who's been researching remote viewing for the last 20 years."

Washington Post: UP CLOSE & PERSONAL WITH A REMOTE VIEWER
Click to expand...
So, you believe we are all in one gigantic “simulation”?
 
BirdinHand said:
So, you believe we are all in one gigantic “simulation”?
Click to expand...
Personally no. I believe we exist in a giant 'created' universe but it doesn't appear to be hosted on computer of the future. That said, if we mere humans can acquire the ability to create a computer that simulates virtual people who experience life as we do, I suspect it would happen. Under the banner of science of course.
 
ataraxia said:
I’d love to see links to the scientific articles and observations on which these claims are based- so that we know it’s actually based on science and is not just wild speculation.

Even “scientists” have been known to do that.
Click to expand...
I would like to see that as well. I posted an interview for discussion for people who are interested. I'm not trying to convince anyone this is true.
 
NOLA Dude said:
He said the reported cost of $20 million for the 20-year project was minuscule compared to its value, and estimated that remote viewers saved the government about $240 million by helping find lost Scud missiles in the Persian Gulf War. Research has shown that remote viewing works 15 percent of the time or more, he said. "There is a huge percentage of intelligence collection systems that don't do as well."

The information provided by remote viewers, he reiterated, was never used without other types of corroboration. He said nearly every agency with an intelligence wing -- including the CIA, the National Security Agency, the Drug Enforcement Agency, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Secret Service, the Coast Guard and Customs -- employed remote viewers at some time or another.

On a typical workday, McMoneagle said, he reported to an old, leaky wooden barracks at Fort Meade, where he went into a one-person office. He sat at a desk with a typewriter and a mug of coffee. The cup said This End Up and had an arrow pointing the wrong way. He was then presented with sealed envelopes -- sometimes large brown ones, sometimes small white ones -- and he was asked to supply information about whatever was inside.

There might be a photograph of a person, and he would be asked to describe where the person was located. In that way, he said, he helped the Army locate hostages in Iran. He said he predicted almost precisely where Skylab was going to fall, 11 months before the spacecraft returned to Earth in 1979. He named the city in Italy -- Padua -- and described the second-floor apartment where Brig. Gen James Dozier was held hostage by the Red Brigades in 1981. The information arrived in Italy on the day Dozier was released.

Over the years, McMoneagle said, he was involved in about 450 missions. One of his favorites was in 1980, when CIA personnel captured a suspected KGB agent in South Africa. They wanted to know how the agent was communicating with the Soviet military. They put an envelope on McMoneagle's desk, and without knowing anything of the man, McMoneagle told the CIA that the man liked to use a small pocket calculator. The calculator turned out to be a disguised short-wave radio.

Last week he appeared on "Nightline" and on the ABC special "Put to the Test." "It's not like he handed me a perfect photograph of the location," said independent producer Ruth Rivin, of Elemental Productions, when asked about McMoneagle's performance. "Some of the descriptions were pretty remarkable," she said. "We followed all the scientific protocol laid out by Edwin May, a nuclear physicist {at SRI} who's been researching remote viewing for the last 20 years."

Washington Post: UP CLOSE & PERSONAL WITH A REMOTE VIEWER
Click to expand...
But I asked why he himself hasn't mastered remote viewing, not McMoneagle. Anyone can do it, so I figured he would learn it to bolster his theory.
 
NOLA Dude said:




Very interesting and fascinating interview with a former NASA physicist who says that all his claims he has tested & backed up with verifiable scientific experiments
Click to expand...

Watch out for Campbells...never invite them to a sleepover.
 
watsup said:
No virtual universe exists.
Click to expand...

some claim we are just a thought in the mind of God.

i haven't gotten that far, but i do know that all reality exists because God spoke and the Universe was created.

with that, i think i have opened the minds of Atheists the world over.


blessings all.


.
 
Lots of Twitter spam in this thread.
 
I don't surprise very easily, but this thread surprises me something real! I know this fellow from way back when I think I remember he worked for Army intel. At least I think that was where I remember him from. He used to offer up some mighty unusual thoughts on topics most of us pilots would politely listen to but sort of forget kind of soon. I recall he was no way stupid and I think we had him over to the house a few times with some other folks and I also remember my first wife didn't care for him at all. BUT I had completely forgotten about him until just a few minutes ago when I saw his picture. That is one of those faces easy to remember and recognize and then I saw the name. I haven't thought about this fella in well over 30 to 40 years. What a strange way to be reminded of somebody, on a Net discussion site. My goodness. What a surprise.

Funny, I don't remember anything about him authoring theories like I see posted in this thread. He was with NSA when we were still a kind of secret and had the nickname No Such Agency. Huge antenna farms all over the place before they started getting those space spy equipment up around the planet.

How about that! Got himself all famous and stuff. As this info sinks in I can't really feel too surprised. It sort of fits hows he was way back. Wow!! Weird!!! I think now I remember he was a terrible poker player.
 
Slartibartfast said:
Generally Bluesky posts don’t contain disinformation.
Click to expand...

giphy.gif


BlueSky is the Social Media version of the DP Fight Club. It's where liberals go when they lose an argument.

Granted, DP Fight Club is superior since BlueSky is chock full of death threats.
 
jmotivator said:
giphy.gif


BlueSky is the Social Media version of the DP Fight Club. It's where liberals go when they lose an argument.

Granted, DP Fight Club is superior since BlueSky is chock full of death threats.
Click to expand...
[citation needed]
 
Slartibartfast said:
That only covers part of your argument.
Click to expand...

You need proof that liberals use Fight Club when they lose an argument?

My reference is to read the fight club forums.
 
jmotivator said:
You need proof that liberals use Fight Club when they lose an argument?

My reference is to read the fight club forums.
Click to expand...
So show me some of what you’re talking s out of you are going to reference it.
 
Slartibartfast said:
So show me some of what you’re talking s out of you are going to reference it.
Click to expand...

Your denial is meaningless. They have a thread where all the liberals cheer when non-liberals are suspended, you make threads labeling non-liberal members. It's where you bitch and moan amongst yourselves. It's probably 90/10 split in favor of liberals/progressives posts versus everyone else down there.

You know it's true, even if you can't admit it.
 
jmotivator said:
Your denial is meaningless. They have a thread where all the liberals cheer when non-liberals are suspended, you make threads labeling non-liberal members. It's where you bitch and moan amongst yourselves. It's probably 90/10 split in favor of liberals/progressives posts versus everyone else down there.

You know it's true, even if you can't admit it.
Click to expand...
Which thread is this?
 
Slartibartfast said:
Which thread is this?
Click to expand...

LOL. Two versions of the one of the thread types I mentioned are pinned at the top of the Fight Club, and there are at least 2 versions of the labeling thread (trolls, Putin puppets) are on the first page and a whole bunch of threads where mostly liberals go to bitch about other posters. Stop playing stupid, that doesn't come off to other people the way you think it does.
 
jmotivator said:
LOL. Two versions of the one of the thread types I mentioned are pinned at the top of the Fight Club, and there are at least 2 versions of the labeling thread (trolls, Putin puppets) are on the first page and a whole bunch of threads where mostly liberals go to bitch about other posters. Stop playing stupid, that doesn't come off to other people the way you think it does.
Click to expand...
Hmm. So what are these theoretical threads called?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom