- Joined
- Jan 28, 2012
- Messages
- 25,240
- Reaction score
- 24,034
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
The Constitution is simply a document we aspire to follow but are not required to follow like the Bible or Koran.
Let's not act the US Constitution is some sort of ten commandments in stone.
Tippmann Armory 9mm Gatling GunThe Firearm Blog
I can see it as it happens. A van pulls up and parks on a busy street somewhere in a city. The back doors to the van are swung open by the driver and inside is the shooter with the gatling gun and starts to mow down people at a new and alarming rate. After going through a couple of mags the doors are shut and the van races off looking for more targets and another street. Definitely a mass murder's wet dream of a weapon. And the NRA will be telling us that it is the right of people to won their own gatling gun as they need it to protect their houses.
Who ever told you that is a ****en retard. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land, no laws enacted can not and should not violate it.The Constitution is simply a document we aspire to follow but are not required to follow like the Bible or Koran.
Let's not act the US Constitution is some sort of ten commandments in stone.
with papers?
damn is that stupid. its the law of the land
Who ever told you that is a ****en retard. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land, no laws enacted can not and should not violate it.
The rate of fire of those old timey gatling guns is 200 rounds per minute which that one in the article is a scaled down version of. It would be just easier and cheaper to just use regular semiautomatic firearms in your scenario. Which is probably what gang bangers do all the time. They are called drive by shootings.
Gatling gun - Wikipedia
So that means in 30 seconds you could empty a 100 rounds, which is more than twice the rate of the Dayton shooter who got off 42 rounds in about 32 seconds.
Based on one person's interpretation.
The street price on the new Tippmann Armory 9mm Gatling Gun hasn’t been officially set as of yet, but expect it to be around $3500 to $4000
No its not based on one person's interpretation. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land. That is a fact. Who ever told you that it wasn't the supreme law of the law lied their ass off to you and is an anti-American piece of ****.
what a load.
The only load here is your retard claim that the Constitution is simply a document we aspire to follow but are not required to follow. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Who ever told you it wasn't the supreme law of the land lied their ass off to you. Part of the supreme court's job is making sure the laws that are challenged before it are constitutional.
The only load here is your retard claim that the Constitution is simply a document we aspire to follow but are not required to follow. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land. Who ever told you it wasn't the supreme law of the land lied their ass off to you. Part of the supreme court's job is making sure the laws that are challenged before it are constitutional.
Tippmann Armory 9mm Gatling GunThe Firearm Blog
I can see it as it happens. A van pulls up and parks on a busy street somewhere in a city. The back doors to the van are swung open by the driver and inside is the shooter with the gatling gun and starts to mow down people at a new and alarming rate. After going through a couple of mags the doors are shut and the van races off looking for more targets and another street. Definitely a mass murder's wet dream of a weapon. And the NRA will be telling us that it is the right of people to won their own gatling gun as they need it to protect their houses.
The street price on the new Tippmann Armory 9mm Gatling Gun hasn’t been officially set as of yet, but expect it to be around $3500 to $4000
Don’t be scared. You have a better chance of getting hit by lightning than shot with a Gatling gun. LOL ��
Actually if you are privileged white boy, stay out of the hood, you have a much greater chance of being murdered by anything other than a Gatling gun. LOL ��
White boys should definitely stay out of the hood. There's still a long way to go to get rid of violent racism there - and unfortunately it may be getting worse rather than better - exactly as the Democratic Party has always pushed to create as much separation between black and white people as possible. They are now also furiously pursuing making as much separation between Latinos and whites - and blacks and Latinos.
If you are a white male, stay out of the hood. You are highly suspect as to why you are there and you are opportunity to retaliate against your ancestors enslaving theirs - even if there is no slavery in their ancestry and or don't if there was. This is exactly as the Democratic Party and the propagandists of the MSM, press and Internet of the super rich corporate white "liberals" the wealthiest people in the history of earth - want. They WANT black people to hate white people - and they want white people afraid of black people. That is what the Democratic Party has ALWAYS done and pursued - racial segregation and division.
The only thing rediculous here is your claim the Constitution is not the supreme law of the land. Where did you hear that bull**** claim it wasn't? Who was your teacher that lied to you and said the Constitution wasn't the supreme law of the land?Thank JR for proving my point
Just Ridiculous!
I disagree. I had no problems visiting Compton and Watts in southern California. If I wanted to play a good game of basketball, then I would always go to either Venice or Compton. Are there black ignorant bigots like there are white ignorant bigots? Absolutely, but they are also a minority. The overwhelming majority of blacks were just as comfortable with me being in Compton or Watts, as the overwhelming majority of whites were comfortable with blacks in Santa Monica or Pacific Palisades. There are always going to be a minority of ignorant pricks, regardless of the color of their skin, you shouldn't allow that to stop you from doing what you want because the overwhelming majority are not that way.
I've been all over East Los Angeles as well, and the Latinos or Hispanics (or whatever you want to call them) are no different from anyone else.
I don't know that area at all, my experience (extensive) is Chicago.
It's all about the odds, circumstances, persons involved etc. Danger and self defense is a matter of the odds, not certainty. A person should consider and adjust upon the odds. There is a saying I have always tried to live by: "Fear is a worthless emotion - but caution is always advised."
In the case of humans I don't think the predator/prey analogy works. Humans have the choice of being either, and it very much is a choice. In either case, one never runs from a predator. Predatory animals are instinctually programmed to chase anything running away from them. Wolves are actually coursing predators. Meaning they literally eat on the run. So the very last thing you want to do when faced with a predator is to run away.Another maybe odd view I have is that the rule of nature is that there are predators and prey. The prey can flee, try to hide or fight back. If fleeing or hiding is not possible or known to likely fail, the prey should fight against the odds.
I can not know what I would do in the future as no one knows the future. But in the past, anytime I was being put into the "prey" situation my goal was to do anything to shift my role to also be prey. I have to first flee or hide - but my goal is to shift roles - something predators rarely consider when the are operating in the predator mode. They do not expect the prey to attack, do not expect the prey to double back at them, do not expect the prey they are chasing and now trying to hide - instead be lying in waiting.
Most mass shooters are not combat experienced and have very little firearm experience. They do not grasp out quickly a person can dash 30, 40, 50 feet. They do not realize their vision only allows them seeing less than 50% of what is around them. They think horizontally and 2 dimensional. They do not grasp that almost anything hard is a weapon. They do not understand natural delay times in reaction to being attacked. They do not realize that actually, in the final outcome, maybe it wasn't his gun, but the gun of his prey who got it away from him, killing him with his own gun.
If you actually read about mass shooting in settings where their prey (other people) are close, when any DO decide to attack rather than flee, more times than not they have been able to overcome and disarm the shooter.
That even now is in most training for mass shooting situations. Flee. Barricade. Hide. If that fails? FIGHT with anything and everything you can find. Even if shot while charging, that doesn't mean you die and doesn't mean he wins. It is not like Hollywood where if someone is shot they instantly fly backwards dead before they hit the ground.
Most people don't realize in nearly any indoor setting they are surrounded by weapons - mostly blunt force and throwable weapons. Being combat inexperienced, the shooter would instinctively first duck IF he sees it. There is A LOT of psychology involved in violent conflicts, including subconscious instinctive reactions.
These lone wolf, shooting and fighting inexperienced shooters are already so emotionally charged up having to deal with massive never experienced info they are highly prone to have confused and slow reactions - plus guns are extremely loud, which is highly disorienting - which there are always breaks in their shooting heard if it is recorded by audio. Having ear protectors or not, their hearing is highly reduced - still another disorienting handicap and vulnerability (why police use flash-bang devices).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?