I would not be all that confident for several reasons, the Dems will try to go backwards and ban specific firearms such as AR's and AK's just as they have done in the past, not thinking confiscation but new sales would be ended, and since it was done once before and fought in the courts it is unlikely that the SC would end any such ban. As for handguns, I can see them also banning future sales of magazines over 10 rounds, it has also been tested in the courts and so far the laws have survived, which again means it would be unlikely to be stopped by the SC. I would also add that they can make background checks more lengthy and add waiting periods before taking possession of a firearm that someone has already purchased and passed the background check process. They are ready pushing for it to be legal to sue firearms manufactures for how a person uses their firearms and that in itself could put some manufactures out of business or force them to deduce their manufacture of specific types of firearms. Lastly they can impose high taxes on ammunition and place limits on how much ammo an individual can buy in a given amount of time.
Maybe you missed it but it is highly likely that the SC will be expanded, probably not enough to give the Liberals the majority but enough to make Roberts vote as important as it has been. I think you can count on that happening next year if the Dems win, which is likely. It Is What It Is.
the magazine ban in california was struck down by the ninth circuit.
court expansion or gun bans will lead to the GOP gaining massively in 2022, assuming Senile Joe and Kamala Ho are successful
It will come back around again, you know, if you don't succeed the first time......
I have serious doubts on that, so long as the Dems have the Pandemic to point to the Repubs will have a real hard time gaining back any control, maybe 8 years from now but not for a long time and until the Republican Party cleans house.
the supreme court would have to strike it down, or the rare case of an en banc reversal
I think you are wrong. If Biden gets the win and both houses, he will have a tax hiking orgasm and that will cause a massive backlash.
Whoopie! We need more guns in america. Everyone should have their own personal arsenal including nukes to protect themselves from their fellow citizens and evil government.
I guess we shall see, funny they did not do that over the 8 years they were in office. That said we are going to have to raise some taxes, we have a huge Bill to pay and probably more to be added.
with the amount of democrat inspired violence and looting, lots of honest americans realized the value of being armed.
Prove they are democrats doing all the violence and looting. Saying it just doesn't make it so, sorry. You and your honest americans. How many honest americans became mass shooters? Riddle me that one mr I love guns.
Not gonna happen.
statistically insignificant amounts. probably less than the number of stoners who kill others while driving stoned.why are you so afraid of guns?-or is it once again, a hatred for the way many gun owners vote?
It's more the way you think. Should I not be afraid of guns? Wanna bet more drunks kill people while driving than stoners? How much cannabis have you smoked? How about alcohol consumption? Have you ever driven high? Let me answer all of those questions for you, you're a law abiding citizen so no.
I have smoked weed-never driven stoned. I don't' drink anymore-stopped drinking when I was sworn in as a city prosecutor. I agree that drunks kill more people than stoners. Drunks kill more people than those using AR 15 rifles.
I agree with you there dude. I've said over and over I'm not against guns, I like shooting them at targets. I know others like/need to shoot animals. I'm against guns on the streets by anyone but law enforcement. I'm against having a thirty round clip or true assault rifles. All of that stuff is strictly for killing people. What hunter uses a ten round clip? None that I know of. Who needs a bazooka to kill a rabbit? I think folks like you go a bit overboard in 'protecting' what you consider your second amendment rights. I feel after reading so many of your posts on firearms, you don't know how to compromise on the issue. It's your way or no way.
Good thing for you this is not the heyday of Ronald Reagan.
