• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

This says volumes, VOLUMES, about the character of the Bidens (or more appropriately the lack thereof)

ElChupacabra said:
Except that was done privately, correct? Or did they hold a press conference for family and friends and publicly chastise her?
Click to expand...
I never said anything about a press conference, that was your idea. They are very public about their actions. They are not hiding anything or making excuses for their daughter anymore.
 
Rawley said:
LOL As opposed to their treatment of their granddaughter. which you seem to approve of, - we've paid your mother off, you are dead to us, you are a stranger.
Click to expand...
Perhaps the mother is the one that doesn’t want to have her child around the circus that is politics in 2022.

I know I sure as hell wouldn’t want my kid anywhere near it
 
BirdinHand said:
Perhaps the mother is the one that doesn’t want to have her child around the circus that is politics in 2022.

I know I sure as hell wouldn’t want my kid anywhere near it
Click to expand...
Well, I disagree. I wouldn't view a small act of kindness/reconciliation by grandparents to be a circus.
 
Rawley said:
I never said anything about a press conference, that was your idea.
Click to expand...
In the context of a public figure, and in the form of a question for the poster known as Rawley who posited the idea Hunter should be publicly chastised because his actions were public.

Rawley said:
They are very public about their actions. They are not hiding anything or making excuses for their daughter anymore.
Click to expand...
Did they take out a news ad, PSA, billboard etc. to make this public?
 
Gimmesometruth said:
The usual strawman.

You want a public chastisement which includes a mother who does not want to be drawn in.
Click to expand...
Can you imagine?

These trash rag media sources can’t help but repeatedly speak derogatory of the Mom…thankfully only once a year when there’s no stocking.

Can you imagine the ugly if she didn’t stay so far away? Kudos to her to knowing how toxic some media and people are and keeping her child far away from it.
 
ElChupacabra said:
In the context of a public figure, and in the form of a question for the poster known as Rawley who posited the idea Hunter should be publicly chastised because his actions were public.


Did they take out a news ad, PSA, billboard etc. to make this public?
Click to expand...

YOU're in love with YOUr press conference idea. Things can be public without having a press confernce. Why are YOU having such as difficult time with this concept. And yes that is a personal rebuke becasue you've hit this strawman four times now
 
BirdinHand said:
Can you imagine?

These trash rag media sources can’t help but repeatedly speak derogatory of the Mom
Click to expand...
Huh? It's the Bidens that been treating this woman as trailer trash. From day one.
 
Rawley said:
YOU're in love with YOUr press conference idea.
Click to expand...
I'm not. I'm following the premise posited by the poster known as Rawley.

Rawley said:
Things can be public without having a press confernce.
Click to expand...
Sure, which is why I asked how that was done and have not received a response from the poster known as Rawley.

Rawley said:
Why are YOU having such as difficult time with this concept.
Click to expand...
Not at all. I'm simply asking for clarification of what they are very public about their actions means.

Rawley said:
And yes taht is a personal rebuke becasue you've hit this strawman four time now
Click to expand...
There's no strawman anywhere, but the poster known as Rawley sure is deflecting quiet a bit.
 
ElChupacabra said:
I'm not. I'm following the premise posited by the poster known as Rawley.


Sure, which is why I asked how that was done and have not received a response from the poster known as Rawley.


Not at all. I'm simply asking for clarification of what they are very public about their actions means.


There's no strawman anywhere, but the poster known as Rawley sure is deflecting quiet a bit.
Click to expand...
Have a blessed day
 
There's plenty of 'whataboutisms' in this thread, so I'll avoid that 'cause it has nothing to do with anything except attacking the poster instead of the post.

I don't care who you are, that's a pretty shitty thing to do.
 
holbritter said:
There's plenty of 'whataboutisms' in this thread, so I'll avoid that 'cause it has nothing to do with anything except attacking the poster instead of the post.

I don't care who you are, that's a pretty shitty thing to do.
Click to expand...
There's something to be said about the consistency of a person's position though. I'm not familiar enough with the OP's posting history to know where he's stood on the character of presidents in the past, but if there was silence on the questionable actions of a president he supported and he now makes a fuss over what may seem questionable purely along partisan lines, then it's fair for it to be called out.
 
ElChupacabra said:
There's something to be said about the consistency of a person's position though. I'm not familiar enough with the OP's posting history to know where he's stood on the character of presidents in the past, but if there was silence on the questionable actions of a president he supported and he now makes a fuss over what may seem questionable purely along partisan lines, then it's fair for it to be called out.
Click to expand...
Just check out the poster's non-stop defense of Trump in the Mar-a-Lago documents threads if you need more insight.
 
element94 said:
No problem with the Don dining with pedophiles, Nazis and white supremacists? But triggered by Christmas stockings! 🤣
Click to expand...
Yup It's all about me.. Kudos
 
element94 said:
No, I think it's specifically about priorities.
Click to expand...
Nope. You said I was triggered. It's all about me, not the Bidens' scummy behavior toward their grandchild and her mother.
 
Rawley said:
Nope. You said I was triggered. It's all about me, not the Bidens' scummy behavior toward their grandchild and her mother.
Click to expand...
Oh, I stand by that, and it's indicative of your priorites. I'm sure your concern is for the girl. This thread just reeks particularly of desperation to deflect.
 
element94 said:
Oh, I stand by that, and it's indicative of your priorites. I'm sure your concern is for the girl. This thread just reeks particularly of desperation to deflect.
Click to expand...
Four posts and not one attempt to defend the Bidens' scumbaggery. Smart move. It's all about me
 
Can someone be dinged for spamming and sea lioning in their own thread? 🤷‍♂️
 
Rawley said:
Four posts and not one attempt to defend the Bidens' scumbaggery. Smart move. It's all about me
Click to expand...
It would be a family issue, not political or even law and order, so it's none of my business. I can't even trust that it's true.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom